BroadWilliam, and WadeNicholas. 1982. Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science.New York: Simon & Schuster.
4.
ChubinDaryl E.. 1985a. “Research Malpractice.”Bioscience35(February): 80–89.
5.
ChubinDaryl E.. 1985b. “Misconduct in Research: An Issue of Science Policy and Practice.”Minerva23(Summer): 175–202.
6.
ChubinDaryl E.. 1987. “A Soap Opera for Science.”Bioscience37(April): 259–61.
7.
GoldbergAlbert I.. 1986. “Dialectic Process Involving Value Imperatives in Science: Communality vs. Universalism as They Influence Secretive Behavior.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York, NY, August.
8.
GreenbergDaniel S.. 1986a. “Tale of the Fraud Study That's Too Hot to Publish.”Science & Government Report16(15 March): 1–6.
9.
GreenbergDaniel S.. 1986b. “Part II: The Fraud Study That's Too Hot to Publish.”Science & Government Report16(1 April): 1–3.
10.
HoltenGerald. 1986. “Niels Bohr and the Integrity of Science.”American Scientist74(May-June): 237–43.
11.
ListC. J.. 1985. “Scientific Fraud: Social Deviance or Failure of Virtue?”Science, Technology, & Human Values10(Fall): 27–36.
12.
MaddoxJohn. 1987. “Fraud, Libel and the Literature.”Nature325(15 January): 181–82.
13.
MertonRobert K.. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.”Science159(5 January): 56–63.
14.
NelkinDorothy. 1984. Science as Intellectual Property.New York: Macmillan.
15.
NelkinDorothy, and ChalkRosemary. 1986. “Science as Intellectual Property Revisited.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Philadelphia, PA, May.
16.
Office of Technology Assessment. 1986. The Regulatory Environment for Science—A Technical Memorandum.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. OTA-TM-SET-34 (February).
17.
OrlansHarold. 1975. “Neutrality and Advocacy in Policy Research.”Policy Sciences6: 107–19.
18.
SchmausWarren. 1983. “Fraud and the Norms of Science.”Science, Technology, & Human Values8(Fall): 12–22.
19.
“Secrecy in University-Based Research: Who Controls? Who Tells?”1985. [Special issue] Science, Technology, & Human Values10 (Spring): 3–114.
20.
StewartWalter W., and FederNed. 1986. “Professional Practices among Biomedical Scientists: A Study of a Sample Generated by an Unusual Event.” Unpublished manuscript, Bethesda, MD (11 May version).
21.
StewartWalter W.. 1987. “The Integrity of the Scientific Literature.”Nature325(15 January): 207–14.
22.
U.S. Public Health Service. 1986. “Policies and Procedures for Dealing with Possible Misconduct in Science.”NIH Guide15(18 July): 1–37.
23.
WestrumRon. 1986. “Review of Deviant Science: The Case of Parapsychology.”Contemporary Sociology15 (July): 620–21.
24.
WoolfPatricia. 1981. “Fraud in Science: How Much, How Serious?”Hastings Center Report (October): 9–14.
25.
WoolfPatricia. 1986. “Testimony Prepared for the Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives.” Unpublished manuscript (14 May).
26.
WoolfPatricia. 1987. “ ‘Pressure to Publish’ Is a Lame Excuse for Scientific Fraud.”Chronicle of Higher Education (September 23): A52.
27.
ZuckermanHarriet. 1977. “Deviant Behavior and Social Control in Science.” Pp. 87–138 in Deviance and Social Change. Vol. 1, Sage Annual Reviews in Studies of Deviance, edited by SagarinEdward A.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
ZuckermanHarriet. 1984. “Norms and Deviant Behavior in Science.”Science, Technology, & Human Values9(Winter): 7–13.
29.
ZurerPamela S.. 1987. “Workshop Airs Research Ethics and Monitoring of Scientific Misconduct.”Chemical & Engineering News (October 5): 44, 46, 48.