Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.Minutes of meetings filed in Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Public Documents RoomWashington, DC, s.v. "Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards." (1962-63).
2.
Bronfman, L., and T. Mattingly, Jr. "Critical Mass: Politics, Technology and the Public Interest." 17 Nuclear Safety (1976) 539-549.
3.
Brooks, H.The Public Concern in Radioactive Waste Management. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Management of Wastes from the LWR Fuel Cycle, Denver, 11-16 July 1976 (Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1976.)
4.
Bupp, I.C., and J. Derian.Nuclear Reactor Safety: The Twilight of Probability (Cambridge, MA: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1975).
5.
Buttel, F.H., and W.L. Flinn."The Structure of Support for the Environmental Movement, 1968-70." 39 Rural Sociology (Spring 1974): 56-59
6.
. Campbell, A., P.E. Converse, W.E. Miller, and D.E. Stokes.The American Voter (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1960).
7.
Clelland, D., and M. Bremseth."Student Reactions to Breeder Reactors." Department of Sociology, University of Tennessee, KnoxvillePresented at annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago, 1977.
8.
Cooper, W.E., and B.F. Langer."Nuclear Vessels are Safe." 97 Mechanical Engineering4 (1975): 18-23
Duncan, O.D."Acceptability of Nuclear Power: Sex Differences ( Tucson, AZ: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona,1976).
11.
Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, and S. Read.How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Toward Technological Risks and Benefits. (Eugene, OR: Decision Research, 1976).
Ford, D., and H. Kendall."Nuclear Misinformation." 17 Environment (July/August 1975): 17-27.
14.
Gallup, G."Most See Need for Nuclear Power, But Many Concerned About Safety."Chicago: Field Newspaper Syndicate , 22 July 1976.
15.
Gillette, R.Series of articles on nuclear safety in 177 Science (1972)
16.
:"Nuclear Safety (I): The Roots of Dissent," pp. 771-775;
17.
"Nuclear Safety (II): The Years of Delay," pp. 867-870;
18.
"Nuclear Safety (III): Critics Charge Conflict of Interest," pp. 970-975;
19.
"Nuclear Safety (IV): Barriers to Communication," pp. 1030-1032.
20.
Groth, A., and H. Schutz."Voter Attitudes on the 1976 Nuclear Initiative in California."Environmental Quality Series No. 25. ( Davis: University of California Institute of Governmental Affairs,1976).
21.
Hohenemser, C., R. Kasperson, and R. Kates."The Distrust of Nuclear Power." 196 Science (1977): 25-34.
22.
Holden, C."Religious Groups Unite Behind Banner of Conservation, Renewable Energy Sources." 207 Science (25 January 1980): 390-391.
23.
Hosmer, C.RemarksPresented at nuclear information strategies workshop of the Atomic Industrial Forum, Las Vegas, 28 September 1976. Available from Atomic Industrial Forum, Washington, DC.
24.
Kasperson, J.X., R.E. Kasperson, C. Hohenemser, and R.W. Kates."Institutional Responses to Three Mile Island."35Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (December 1979): 20-24.
25.
Kasperson, R."Nuclear Waste Management and the Public: Considerations for Public Policy."Testimony presented to the California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, 26 May 1977. Available from the Center for Technology, Environment, and Development, Clark University, Worcester, MA.
26.
La Porte, T., and D. Metlay."Technology Observed : Attitudes of a Wary Public."188Science (1975): 121-127.
27.
Lifton, R."Nuclear Energy and the Wisdom of the Body." 32 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists7 ( 1976): 16-20.
28.
Louis Harris and Associates.A Survey of Public and Leadership Attitudes Toward Nuclear Power Development in the United States. (New York: Ebasco Services, 1975).
29.
Maynard, W.S., S.M. Nealey, J.A. Hibert, and M.K. Lindell.Public Values Associated with Nuclear Waste Disposal . (Seattle: Battelle Human Affairs Research Centers, 1976).
30.
Mazur, A."Opposition to Technological Innovation." 13 Minerva (Spring 1975): 58-81.
31.
Mazur, A., and B. Conant."Controversy Over a Local Nuclear Waste Repository."Social Science Program, Syracuse University, Syracuse , NY, 1977.
32.
McEvoy, J., III."The American Concern with the Environment." In W.R. Burch, Jr., Neil H. Cheek, and Miller L. Taylor, eds. Social Behavior, Natural Resources and the Environment. (New York: Harper and Row, 1972), pp. 214-236.
33.
Mitchell, Robert C."The Public Response to a Highly Publicized Major Failure of a Controversial Technology." Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper D-60, 1980.
34.
Mitchell, Robert C."The Public Speaks Again: A New Environmental Survey."Resources60 (Spetember-November 1978).
35.
Mueller, J."Trends in Public Support for the Wars in Korea and Vietnam." 65 American Political Science Review. ( 1971): 358-375.
36.
Mulvihill, R.J., D.R. Arnold, C.E. Bloomquist, and B. Epstein."Analysis of the United States Power Reactor Accident Probability: Technical Final Report No. 2" (WASH-740 Update). ( Los Angeles: Planning Research Corporation1965). Filed in Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Public Documents Room, Washington, DC.
37.
Nader, R. Quoted in 23 Nuclear Industry6(1976): 28.
38.
National Council of Churches."The Plutonium Economy." Committee of Inquiry: The Plutonium Economy ( New York: National Council of Churches, 1976).
39.
National Council of Churches.Energy and Ethics. (New York: National Council of Churches, 1979).
40.
Nealey, Stanley M., and William C. Rankin .Nuclear Knowledge and Nuclear Attitudes: Is Ignorance Bliss? (Seattle, WA: Battelle Human Affairs Research Center, 1978).
41.
Nelkin, D.Nuclear Power and Its Critics: The Cayuga Lake Controversy . (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press , 1971).
42.
New York Times. 10 June 1976
43.
. Opinion Research."Public Attitudes Toward Environmental Tradeoffs." 33 Opinion Research Public Opinion Index (December 1975): 1-8.
44.
Otway, H., and M. Fishbein."The Determinants of Attitude Formation: An Application to Nuclear Power." (Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Research Memorandum76-80, 1976).
45.
Pahner, P."The Psychological Displacement of Anxiety: An Application to Nuclear Energy." In D. Okrent, ed. Risk-Benefit Methodology and Application, Proceedings of the Engineering Foundation Workshop, Asilomar, California, (Los Angeles: University of California,1975).
46.
Pahner, P."A Psychological Perspective of the Nuclear Energy Controversy." Research Memorandum76-67. (Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1976 ).
47.
Primack, J., and F. Von Hippel.Advice and Dissent : Scientists in the Political Arena . (New York: Basic Books , 1974).
48.
Reed, John, and John Wilkes."Nuclear Knowledge and Nuclear Attitudes: An Examination of Informed Opinion." In manuscript.
49.
Roberts, R."Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy—The Government's Role."Speech to the Atomic Industrial Forum, San Francisco, 29 November 1975. Available from Atomic Industrial Forum, Washington, DC.
50.
Setlow, C., and G. Steinem."Why Women Voted for Richard Nixon (Richard Nixon?)." 2 Ms. (March 1973): 66-67, 109-110
51.
. Sierra Club.The Sierra Club and Nuclear Power . (San Francisco: The Sierra Club, 1975).
52.
Slovic, Paul, Sarah Lichtenstein, and Baruch Fischhoff ."Images of Disaster: Perception and Acceptance of Risks from Nuclear Power." In A. Perlmutter, O.K. Kadiroglu, and L. Scott, eds.
53.
Proceedings of the Second International Scientific Forum on an Acceptable World Energy Future (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, forthcoming.) Steinem, G. "Women Voters Can't be Trusted." 1 Ms (July 1972): 47-51, 131.
54.
Sundstrom, E.P., E.J. Costimiris, R.C. DeVault, D.A. Powell, J.W. Lounsbury, T.J. Mattingly, Jr. , E.M. Passino, and E. Peelle."Citizens' Views About the Proposed Hartsville Nuclear Power Plant: A Survey of Residents' Perceptions in August 1975." (Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory1977)
55.
. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.Theoretical Possibilities and Consequences of Major Accidents in Large Nuclear Power Plants (WASH-740 (Washington, DC: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission1957).
56.
Weinberg, A."The Maturity and Future of Nuclear Energy." 64 American Scientist (January/ February 1976): 16-21
57.
. Weinberg, A."Is Nuclear Energy Acceptable?" 33 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. (April 1977): 54-60.