Temporality has become a prominent theme in research on infrastructure in science and technology studies. Infrastructure is often conceptualized as permanent and enduring, except when it breaks down. This focus limits the scope of phenomena to which the status of infrastructure is ascribed, risking overlooking indispensable entities of sociomaterial ordering and transformation that are anticipated and built to be temporary. These temporary infrastructures are established in the bounded period between provisional stabilization and the permanent reintegration of routine practice. Building on pragmatist theories, we develop a set of sensitizing concepts for studying such deliberately temporary infrastructure, emphasizing the role of temporal boundary work that anticipates lifespans to regulate form investments, creating interstices for experimentation with alternative practices, but also for intensified dominance. This makes temporary infrastructure a crucial technology of power, enabling transformative practices, rather than sustaining long-term routines. To map the field, we propose a typology comprising interim infrastructure, temporary infrastructure of development, demise, and experimentation, and event infrastructure. Finally, we highlight the paradox of delayed endings and persistence to shed light on infrastructural trajectories that diverge from linear long-term planning and instead arise from dynamic reconfigurations of temporary infrastructure and problem situations.
AgambenGiorgio.1998. Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
4.
AkinMarjorieBardJames C.WeiszGary J.. 2015. “Asian Coins Recovered from Chinese Railroad Labor Camps. Evidence of Cultural Practices and Transnational Exchange.” Historical Archaeology49 (1): 110–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03376962.
AppelHannah.2018. “Infrastructural Time.” In The Promise of Infrastructure, edited by AnandNikhilGuptaAkhilAppelHannah, 41–61. Durham: Duke University Press.
7.
AradauClaudia.2010. “Security that Matters. Critical Infrastructure and Objects of Protection.” Security Dialogue41 (5): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610382687.
8.
ArampatziAthina.2017. “The Spatiality of Counter-Austerity Politics in Athens, Greece. Emergent ‘Urban Solidarity Spaces.’.” Urban Studies54 (9): 2155–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016629311.
9.
BarryAndrew. 2020. “The Material Politics of Infrastructure.” In TechnoScienceSociety. Technological Reconfigurations of Science and Society, edited by MaasenSabineDickelSaschaSchneiderChristoph, 91–109. Cham: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43965-1_6.
BowkerGeoffrey C.StarSusan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out. Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14.
BrownGavinFeigenbaumAnnaFrenzelFabianMcCurdyPatrick, eds. 2018. Protest Camps in International Context. Spaces, Infrastructures and Media of Resistance. Bristol: Policy Press.
ButlerJudith.2018. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press.
17.
CallonMichel.1981. “Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is Not.” In The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, edited by KnorrKarin D.KrohnRogerWhitleyRichard, 197–219. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9109-5_8.
18.
CarseAshley. 2016. “Keyword: Infrastructure. How a Humble French Engineering Term Shaped the Modern World.” In Infrastructures and Social Complexity, edited by Harvey Penelope Morita Jensen, and Atsuro, 27–39. London: Routledge.
19.
CarseAshleyKneasDavid. 2019. “Unbuilt and Unfinished. The Temporalities of Infrastructure.” Environment and Society10 (1): 9–28. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2019.100102.
20.
CollierStephen J.LakoffAndrew. 2008. “The Vulnerability of Vital Systems. How ‘Critical Infrastructure’ Became a Security Problem.” In Securing “the Homeland.” Critical Infrastructure, Risk an (In)Security, edited by Dunn CaveltyMyriamSoby KristensenKristian, 17–39. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
21.
Commission on the Storage of High-Level Radioactive Waste. 2016. Abschlussbericht der Kommission Lagerung hoch radioaktiver Abfallstoffe. Drucksache 18/9100. Accessed 1 November 2024. https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/18/091/1809100.pdf.
DeweyJohn.1938. Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.
28.
DunningRichardNurseAlexander. 2021. “The Surprising Availability of Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Through COVID-19.” Town Planning Review92 (2): 149–55. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.35.
29.
EdwardsPaul.2002. “Infrastructure and Modernity. Scales of Force, Time, and Social Organization in the History of Sociotechnical Systems.” In Modernity and Technology, edited by MisaThomas J.BreyPhilippFeenbergAndrew, 185–225. Cambridge: MIT Press.
30.
EdwardsPaulBowkerGeoffreyJacksonStevenWilliamsRobin. 2009. “Introduction. An Agenda for Infrastructure Studies.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems10 (5), 364–74. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00200.
31.
FeltUlrike. 2025. Residues that Matter. Why Innovation Societies Need to Rethink Their Response-Ability. Preprint. Vienna. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15827925.
32.
FoucaultMichel.1988. “Technologies of the Self.” In Technologies of the Self, edited by MartinLuther H.GutmanHuckHuttonPatrick H., 16–49. Frankfurt/Main: S. Fischer.
33.
FoucaultMichel.2009. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
GierynThomas F.1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review48 (6): 781–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
35.
GrahamSteveMarvinSimon. 2002. Splintering Urbanism. Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202.
36.
GrenzTiloKnoppPhilipp. 2021. “COVID-19, Routinedynamiken und Strukturreflexivität. Zum Ereignishaften Wandel der Protestformen von Fridays for Future.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie46 (4): 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-021-00462-z.
37.
GuggenheimMichael.2012. “Laboratizing and De-Laboratizing the World. Changing Sociological Concepts for Places of Knowledge Production.” History of the Human Sciences25 (1): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111422978.
38.
GuptaAkhil.2018. “The Future in Ruins. Thoughts on the Temporality of Infrastructure.” In The Promise of Infrastructure, edited by AnandNikhilGuptaAkhilAppelHannah, 62–79. Durham: Duke University Press.
39.
HarveyPenny.2018. “Infrastructure in and out of Time. The Promise of Roads in Contemporary Peru.” In The Promise of Infrastructure, edited by AnandNikhilGuptaAkhilAppelHannah, 80–101. Durham: Duke University Press.
40.
HeideggerMartin.1996. Being and Time. A Translation of Sein Und Zeit. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
41.
HeinonenPijatta.2019. “Constructing Autonomy. The Significance of Architecture in Creating and Manifesting Autonomy in Protest Camps.” Social Movement Studies18 (6): 647–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1629278.
42.
HoweCymeneLockremJessicaAppelHannahHackettEdwardBoyerDominicHallRandalSchneider-MayersonMatthew, et al.2015. “Paradoxical Infrastructures. Ruins, Retrofit, and Risk.” Science, Technology, & Human Values41 (3): 547–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915620017.
43.
HughesThomas P.1983. Networks of Power. Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
44.
JaeggiRahel.2018. Critique of Forms of Life. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
45.
JasanoffSheila. 2022. “Spaceship or Stewardship. Imaginaries of Sustainability in the Information Age.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung47 (4): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.47.37
46.
JellemaPleuntjeAnnemansMargoHeylighenAnn. 2021. “Hospitals’ Decision-Making Regarding Infrastructural Adaptations in Response to Covid-19.” In Design Culture(s)—Proceedings of Cumulus Roma, 2289–301. Roma: Cumulus. https://cumulusroma2020.org/proceedings/.
JohnsonCharlotteBellSarahBorrionAiduanComberRob. 2021. “Working with Infrastructural Communities. A Material Participation Approach to Urban Retrofit.” Science, Technology, & Human Values46 (2): 320–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920916235.
49.
KarastiHelena.2014. “Long-Term Temporality in STS Research on Infrastructural Technologies.” In Yearbook of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology and Society, edited by BamméArnoGetzingerGünterWieserBernhard, 75–89. München, Wien: Profil.
50.
KarastiHelenaBakerKaren S.MillerandFlorence. 2010. “Infrastructure Time. Long-Term Matters in Collaborative Development.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)19 (3): 377–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z.
51.
KatzIritMartinDianaMincaClaudio. 2018. “The Camp Reconsidered.” In Camps Revisited. Multifaceted Spatialities of a Modern Political Technology, edited by KatzIritMartinDianaMincaClaudio, 1–13. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
52.
KnoppPhilipp.2021. “Zwischen Ermächtigung und Überwachung. Protestkulturen in Mediatisierten Öffentlichkeiten.” In Protestkommunikation. Konflikte um die Legitimität Politischer Öffentlichkeit, edited by HahnKorneliaLangenohlAndreas, 213–35. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31482-8_9.
53.
KnoppPhilipp. 2026 forthcoming. “Infrastrukturelle Formen. Forminvestitionen, Boundary Work und Plurale Rechtfertigungen am Beispiel der Mobilen Nahversorgung.”Soziale Welt.
54.
KnoppPhilippUllrichPeterPlöhseMichael. 2018. “Hamburger Gitter. Entscheidungsräume über Freiheit und Gewahrsam.”G20.Protestinstitut 77(1): 3–33. https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2026-1-3.
55.
Knorr CetinaKarin.1999. Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
56.
KokkinidisGeorgeChecchiMarco. 2023. “Power Matters. Posthuman Entanglements in a Social Solidarity Clinic.” Organization30 (2): 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420973304.
LangleyAnnLindbergKajsaMørkBjørn ErikNicoliniDavideRaviolaElenaWalterLars. 2019. “Boundary Work among Groups, Occupations, and Organizations. From Cartography to Process.” Academy of Management Annals13 (2): 704–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0089.
MaestriGaja.2019. Temporary Camps, Enduring Segregation. The Contentious Politics of Roma and Migrant Housing. Cham: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03736-9.
65.
MeinherzFranziska X.FritzLivia. 2024. “‘The Crisis Justified the Urgency, But Now We Have to Go Back to the Rule of Law.’ Urban Mobility Governance During Covid-19.” Environmental Politics33 (3): 508–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2242741.
66.
NielsenMortenPedersenMorten Axel. 2017. “Infrastructural Imaginaries. Collapsed Futures in Mozambique and Mongolia.” In Infrastructures and Social Complexity. A Companion, edited by HarveyPenelopeJensenCasper BruunMoritaAtsurō, 237–61. Abingdon, Oxon New York, NY: Routledge.
67.
PlantinJean-ChristopheLagozeCarlEdwardsPaul N.SandvigChristian. 2018. “Infrastructure Studies Meet Platform Studies in the Age of Google and Facebook.” New Media & Society20 (1): 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
68.
SavranskyMartinLundyCraig. 2022. “After Progress: Experiments in the Revaluation of Values.” The Sociological Review70 (2): 217–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221084417.
SilverJonathan.2014. “Incremental Infrastructures. Material Improvisation and Social Collaboration Across Post-Colonial Accra.” Urban Geography35 (6): 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2014.933605.
StarSusan LeighBowkerGeoffrey C.. 2006. “How to Infrastructure.” In Handbook of New Media. Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs, edited by LievrouwLeah A.LivingstoneSonia, 230–45. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608245.
74.
StarSusan LeighRuhlederKaren. 1996. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure. Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research7: 111–34. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111.
TrauttmansdorffPaulFeltUlrike. 2023. “Between Infrastructural Experimentation and Collective Imagination. The Digital Transformation of the EU Border Regime.” Science, Technology, & Human Values48 (3): 635–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211057523.
77.
TrentmannFrank.2009. “Disruption is Normal. Blackouts, Breakdown and the Elasticity of Everyday Life.” In Time, Consumption and Everyday Life. Practice, Materiality and Culture, edited by ShoveElizabethTrentmannFrankWilkRichard R., 67–84. Oxford, New York: Berg.
78.
VelkovaJulia.2019. “Data Centers as Impermanent Infrastructures.” Culture Machine18: 2–11.
79.
VelkovaJuliaPlantinJean-Christophe. 2023. “Data Centers and the Infrastructural Temporalities of Digital Media. An Introduction.” New Media & Society25 (2): 273–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221149945.
VolmarAxelStineKyle, eds. 2021. Media Infrastructures and the Politics of Digital Time. Essays on Hardwired Temporalities. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463727426.
82.
Wagner-PacificiRobin. 2017. What Is an Event?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83.
WajsbergMirjamSchapendonkJoris. 2021. “Resonance Beyond Regimes. Migrant’s Alternative Infrastructuring Practices in Athens.” Urban Studies59 (11): 2352–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211044312.
