Pharmaceutical capitalism is often framed as a financially sophisticated and technology-intensive value-creation domain. This approach, as relevant as it can be, neglects essential features of pharmaceutical operations. The paper insists upon one of them, which is the critical role of raw materials procurement originating from wild sources and requiring specific collection skills. Based upon the case study of snake collection for antivenom manufacturing in India, the paper shows the key contribution of Irular snake catchers to the activity of the pharmaceutical industry. It describes the operations involved in snake catching and underlines the expertise required. It also analyzes the working conditions and the socioeconomic situation of the snake catchers’ group, emphasizing the exclusion processes they are exposed to and their status as a “scheduled tribe,” an administrative category conceived of as an affirmative action tool. The paper equally insists upon the entanglements between pharmaceutical capitalism and social exclusion put forward by this situation: beyond the media celebration of snake catching, one has to analyze how the pharmaceutical industry builds upon the skills of discriminated social groups and contributes in a complex and contradictory way to promote their interests, exploit their labor, and renew the forms of exclusion they are facing.
AbrahamJohnBallingerRachel. 2012. “The Neoliberal Regulatory State, Industry Interests, and the Ideological Penetration of Scientific Knowledge: Deconstructing the Redefinition of Carcinogens in Pharmaceuticals.” Science, Technology, & Human Values37 (5): 443–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243911434996.
2.
AminShahid.1987. “Approver’s Testimony, Judicial Discourse: The Case of Chauri Chaura.” In Subaltern Studies V, edited by GuhaRanajit, 166–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
ArnoldDavid.2016. Toxic Histories: Poison and Pollution in Modern India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BaxerresCarineCassierMaurice. 2021. “Introduction: Pharmaceutical Markets in the Global South: Shaped by History and Multiple Regulations.” In Understanding Pharmaceutical Markets: An Analysis of Medicines, Regulations and Health Systems in the Global South. London: Routledge.
BhaumikRahul.2018. “The Production of Ophiological Knowledge in Early British India: Venomous Snakes, Various Practices and Different Responses.” Archiv Orientální86 (1): 73–104. https://doi.org/10.47979/aror.j.86.1.73-104.
7.
BremanJan. 2013. At Work in the Informal Economy of India: A Perspective from the Bottom Up. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
ChakrabartiPratik.2012. Bacteriology in British India: Laboratory Medicine and the Tropics. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
CollinsHarry.2010. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CooperMelindaWaldbyCatherine. 2014. Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12.
DrèzeJeanSenAmartya. 2002. India: Development and Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
FouilletCécileGuérinIsabelleMorvant-RouxSolèneServetJean-Michel. 2016. “Voluntarily or by Force: Microcredit as a Neoliberal Device.” Revue Tiers Monde225: 21–48. https://doi.org/10.3917/rtm.225.0021.
14.
FournierPierreLombaCédricMullerSéverin. 2014. Les Travailleurs du Médicament: L’industrie Pharmaceutique Sous Observation. Toulouse: Érès.
15.
GameiroMariana B. P.QuetMathieu. 2023. “Feral Pharmaceuticalization—Biomedical Uses of Animal Life in Light of the Global Donkey Hide Trade.” BioSocieties18: 679–706. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-022-00288-2.
16.
GaudillièreJean-PaulHessVolker. 2013. Ways of Regulating Drugs in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Cham: Springer.
17.
GuérinIsabelle.2010. “Illegal Work and Debt Bondage in South India.” In The Paradoxes of the Informal Economy: Who Benefits from the Rules?, edited by FontaineLaurenceWeberFlorence, 93–111. Paris: Karthala.
18.
GuérinIsabelleRoeschMarcHélièsOphélieVenkatasubramanianGovindan. 2009. “Microfinance, Debt, and Over-Indebtedness: A Case Study in South India.” Revue Tiers Monde197 (1): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.3917/rtm.197.0131.
19.
GuhaRanajit.1982. “Preface.” In Subaltern Studies I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
GuhaRanajit.1983. “The Prose of Counter-Insurgency.” In Subaltern Studies II, edited by GuhaRanajit, 1–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
HardingSandra.2009. Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22.
HaydenCori.2003. When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
HechtGabrielle.2012. Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
LaveagaGabriela Soto. 2009. Jungle Laboratories: Mexican Peasants, National Projects, and the Making of the Pill. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25.
LiTania Murray. 2014. Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
MaheshkannanS.2019. “A Case Study on the Irula Snake Catchers’ Industrial Cooperative Society Ltd., Ind 969, Vadanemmeli.” Zenith International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research9 (3): 149–57.
27.
MedinaEdenda Costa MarquesIvanHolmesChristina. 2014. Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
PadmavathiC.RamadasSaradha. 2014. “Socio-Economic Profile of the Selected Tribal Population.” International Journal of Current Research6 (11): 9463–68.
29.
PollockAnne.2019. Synthesizing Hope: Matter, Knowledge, and Place in South African Drug Discovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
PowellRandySanchezEldaPerezJohn. 2006. “Farming for Venom: Survey of Snake Venom Extraction Facilities Worldwide.” Applied Herpetology3: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1163/157075406775904460.
31.
QuetMathieu.2023. “Non-standard Nature: Venoms, Serum and Serpentariums in the Uneven Fabrication of Global Health.” Social Science & Medicine332 (September): 116113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116113.
32.
QuetMathieu. 2025. “The Extractive Loops of Biocapital: Venom Procurement and Antivenom Production in India.” Social Studies of Science55 (6): 938–953.
33.
QuetMathieuAl DahdahMarine. Forthcoming. “Snake Markets in India and the Unstable Construction of ‘Natural Resources’.” In Animal Markets and Wildlife Trafficking: Anthropological Perspectives, edited by KeckFrédéricvan der VeldenFrançois. Paris: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle Press.
34.
RajanKaushik Sunder. 2007. “Experimental Values: Indian Clinical Trials and Surplus Health.” New Left Review45: 67–88. https://doi.org/10.64590/ojq
35.
RikapCecilia.2019. “Asymmetric Power of the Core: Technological Cooperation and Competition in the Transnational Innovation Networks of Big Pharma.” Review of International Political Economy26 (5): 987–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1620309.
36.
SinuE.MahadevanUdaya. 2013. “Living Conditions of Irula Tribes in Devathanam Pet Village, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District of Tamil Nadu.” Research Journal of Social Science & Management3 (2): 141–149.
37.
SmithJames H.2021. The Eyes of the World: Mining the Digital Age in the Eastern DR Congo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
TsingAnna Lowenhaupt. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
TsingAnna Lowenhaupt. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
