Starting with China's increasingly prominent role in the global politics of science, this paper considers the case of Chinese policies for the evaluation of Research & Innovation (R&I) and the recent problematization of the Science Citation Index. Developing the notion of global embedding, we conduct a document study of Chinese R&I policy to explore how China mediates the relations between global standardization of research quality and local concerns for indigenous research development. Showing that China seeks high global rankings while also questioning them, we explore how globally familiar representations of the scientific process are expressed in core Chinese statements even as China pursues its own distinctive path. We discuss how co-production of standardization and difference instantiates a both practical and pragmatic resolution of global embedding—suggesting a flexible resolution of what might otherwise be presented as contradictory pressures. Shedding light on the mediations and translations of global ranking systems in R&I policy, we contribute to science & technology studies on co-production by exploring the relations between policies for science and the influence of broader political culture. At stake is the very notion that R&I policies can serve local as well as international needs.
BowkerGeoffrey C.StarSusan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MS: The MIT Press.
9.
BreznitzDanMurphreeMichael. 2011. Run of the Red Queen: Government, Innovation, Globalization, and Economic Growth in China. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
BuckleyChris. 2014. “Xi Urges Greater Innovation in ‘Core Technologies’.” New York Times, Sinosphere, June 10. https://archive.nytimes.com/sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/10/xi-urges-greater-innovation-in-core-technologies.
CAST (Policy document 12). 2023. Notice on Applying for the New Publication Project of the 2023 Journal Excellent Action Plan for Chinese Science and Technology Journals, issued on 6 June 2023.《关于申报2023年度中国科技期刊卓越行动计划高起点新刊项目的通知》http://www.cast.org.cn/xw/tzgg/KJCX/art/2023/art_8800301f75e7453bb330963882e891b2.html (accessed 15 May 2024).
15.
CCP and State Council (The General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council). 2018. “Several Opinions on Further Strengthening the Construction of Scientific Research Integrity” (30 May 2018). 中共中央办公厅 国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步加强科研诚信建设的若干意见》http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-05/30/content_5294886.htm.
Central Government (Central People’s Government). 2006. SCI is not the only criterion for evaluating scientific research results in 2006. 中科院李国杰：SCI不是评价科研成果的唯一标准, https://www.gov.cn/zwhd/2006-10/24/content_421721.htm.
Chinese Academy of Science and Technology (CAST) (Policy document 3). 2017. Code of Ethics and Self-discipline for Scientific and Technological Workers. 科技工作者道德行为自律规范》https://ac.bjut.edu.cn/xsddzt/info/1026/1076.html (accessed 15 May 2024).
20.
China Association for Science and Technology. 2020. Blue Book on China's Scientific Journal Development 2020. Science Press of China.
21.
Chinese Association of Science and Technology (CAST), MOE, other departments (Policy document 1). 2015. Several Opinions on Accurately Grasping the Role of Sci-tech Journals in Academic Evaluation (2015). 关于准确把握科技期刊在学术评价中作用的几点意见》https://epe.zzuli.edu.cn/2015/1206/c7494a77671/page.html (accessed 10 March 2023).
22.
ChristensenNis Høyrup. 2013. “Shaping Markets: A Neoinstitutional Analysis of the Emerging Organizational Field of Renewable Energy in China.” PhD thesis,Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg.
23.
CoARA. 2022. Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment, 19 July 2022, 2022_07_19_rra_agreement_final.pdf (coara.eu).
24.
CzarniawskaBarbaraGenellKristina. 2002. “Gone Shopping? Universities on Their Way to the Market.” Scandinavian Journal of Management18: 455–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(01)00029-X.
25.
DrahosPeterFrankelSusy (eds). 2012. Indigenous Peoples’ Innovation: Intellectual Property Pathways to Development. Canberra: ANU Press.
26.
ErnstDieter.2011. “Toward Greater Pragmatism? China’s Approach to Innovation and Standardization.” Policy Brief18: 1–7. Study of Innovation and Technology in China, SITC. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5bk9533c.
27.
EspositoElenaStarkDavid. 2019. “What’s Observed in a Rating? Rankings as Orientation in the Face of Uncertainty.” Theory, Culture & Society36 (4): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826276.
28.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2021. Towards a Reform of the Research Assessment System. Luxembourg: Publications of the European Union.
29.
FochlerMaximiliande RijckeSarah. 2017. “Implicated in the Indicator Game? An Experimental Debate.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society3, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.108.
30.
General Office of the Central Committee of the CCP and of the State Council (CCP & State Council) (Policy document 4). (2018). Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Project Review, Talent Evaluation, and Institutional Evaluation (“Three evaluations”), issued 3 July 2018. 《关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见》https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1604974438716399758&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed 20 March 2023).
31.
GoldsteinSteven. M.1995. “The Political Foundations of Incremental Reform.” The China Quarterly144Special Issue: China’s Transitional Economy (December 1995): 1105–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000004756.
HammarfeltBjörnde RijckeSarahWoutersPaul. 2017. “From Eminent Men to Excellent Universities: University Rankings as Calculative Devices.” Minerva55: 391–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/45211315.
34.
HeilmannSebastian.2008. “From Local Experiments to National Policy: The Origins of China’s Distinctive Policy Process.” The China Journal59: 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/tcj.59.20066378.
35.
HongWeiZhaoYandong. 2016. “How Social Networks Affect Scientific Performance: Evidence from a National Survey of Chinese Scientists.” Science, Technology, and Human Values41 (2): 243–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915592020.
IrwinAlan.2018. “Re-making ‘Quality’ Within the Social Sciences: The Debate Over Rigour and Relevance in the Modern Business School.” The Sociological Review67 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118782403.
38.
IrwinAlanVedelJane BjørnVikkelsøSigne. 2021. “Isomorphic Difference: Familiarity and Distinctiveness in National Research and Innovation Policies.” Research Policy50 (4): 104220; 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104220.
39.
JasanoffSheila (ed). 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
KaiserMatthiasDrivdalLauraHjellbrekkeJohannesIngierdHeleneRekdalOle Bjørn. 2022. “Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.” Science and Engineering Ethics28 (2): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00351-4.
KirkegaardJulia Kirch. 2019. Wind Power in China—Ambiguous Winds of Change in China’s Energy Market. New York: Routledge.
43.
KirkegaardJulia KirchCaliskanKoray. 2018. “When Socialists Marketize: The Case of China’s Wind Power Market Sector.” Journal of Cultural Economy12 (2): 154–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1544581.
44.
KornbergerMartin.2017. “The Values of Strategy: Valuation Practices, Rivalry and Strategic Agency.” Organization Studies38 (12): 1753–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685365.
45.
Kulczycki, Emanuel, Ying Huang, Alesia A. Zuccala, Tim C. E. Engels, Antonio Ferrara, Raf Guns, Janne Pölönen, Gunnar Sivertsen, Zehra Taşkın and Lin Zhang. 2022. “Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in National Journal Rankings in China and Europe.”Journal of the Association For Information Science and Technology73 (12): 1741–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24706.
LaurentBrice.2024. “Co-production.” In The Elgar Encyclopedia of Science & Technology Studies, edited by FeltUlrikeIrwinAlan, 13–23. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar(forthcoming).
48.
LeadbetterCharlesWilsdonJames. 2007. The Atlas of Ideas: How Asian Innovation Can Benefit Us All. London: Demos.
49.
LeydesdorffLoetAmsterdamskaOlga. 1990. “Dimensions of Citation Analysis.” Science, Technology, & Human Values15 (3), 305–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500303.
LiangWenyuanGuJunNylandChris. 2022. “China’s New Research Evaluation Policy: Evidence from Economics Faculty of Elite Chinese Universities.” Research Policy51: 104407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104407.
52.
LieberthalKenneth. [1995] 2004. Governing China: From Revolution Through Reform. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
53.
LinWenyuan.2016. “Shi (勢), STS, and Theory: Or What Can We Learn from Chinese Medicine?” Science, Technology, & Human Values42 (3): 405–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/26405605.
54.
LinWen-yuanLawJohn. 2014. “A Correlative STS: Lessons from a Chinese Medical Practice.” Social Studies of Science44 (6): 801–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714531325.
55.
LinWen-yuanLawJohn. 2019. “Where Is East Asia in STS?” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal13: 115–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-6995634.
56.
LiuTianxingZhangXiaoyi. n.d.“Scientific Journals should Write the Paper on the Land of Our Country: Analysis of Several Misunderstandings.”
MeidanMichalAndrews-SpeedPhilipXinMa. 2009. “Shaping China’s Energy Policy: Actors and Processes.” Journal of Contemporary China18 (61): 591–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560903033885.
60.
MennickenAndreaNelsonWendy Espeland. 2019. “What’s New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification.” Annual Review of Sociology45: 223–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343.
61.
MertonRobert K. [1942] 1973. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by MertonRobert K, 267–78. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
MOE and MOST (Ministry of Education and Ministry of Science and Technology) (Policy document 9). 2020. Several Opinions on Regulating the Use of Related Indicators for SCI Papers in Colleges and Universities and Establishing Correct Evaluation Guidance (“Opinions”)《关于规范高等学校SCI论文相关指标使用 树立正确评价导向的若干意见》(18 February 2020).
64.
MOST and MOF (Ministry of Science & Technology and Ministry of Finance) (Policy document 10). 2020. “Measures,” i.e. “Several Measures to Eliminate the Bad Orientation of ‘Only Papers’ in Science and Technology Evaluation” 《关于破除科技评价中”唯论文”不良导向的若干措施（试行）》(March 2020), https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-03/03/content_5486229.html (accessed 15 May 2024).
65.
MOST, CCP, General Office of the State Council (2019) (Policy document 7). 2019. Opinions on Further Carrying Forward the Spirit of Scientists and Strengthening the Construction of Work Style and Study Style, 《关于进一步弘扬科学家精神加强作风和学风建设的意见》(14 June 2019). http://www.most.gov.cn/xwzx/twzb/fbh19061301/twbbwzsl/201906/t20190614_147072.html (accessed 15 May 2024).
66.
MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology). 2006. The National Medium- and Long-Term Program for Science and Technology Development (2006–2020) (MLP). 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.ht.
67.
MulkayMichael.1972. “Cultural Growth in Science.” In Sociology of Science, edited by BarnesBarry, 126–42. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
68.
MusselinChristine.2018. “New Forms of Competition in Higher Education.” Socio-Economic Review16 (3): 657–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/SER/MWY033. Sase Presidential Address.
ParadeiseCatherineThoenigJean-Claude. 2017. “Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global Standards.” Organization Studies34 (2): 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612473550.
71.
PfotenhauerSebastianJasanoffSheila. 2017. “Panacea or Diagnosis? Imaginaries of Innovation and the ‘MIT Model’ in Three Political Cultures.” Social Studies of Science47 (6): 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717706110.
72.
PfotenhauerSebastianWentlandAlexanderRugeLuise. 2023. “Understanding Regional Innovation Cultures: Narratives, Directionality, and Conservative Innovation in Bavaria.” Research Policy52 (3 (104704)): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104704.
73.
PontilleDavidTornyDidier. 2015. “From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review.” Human Studies38 (1): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9335-z.
74.
PowerMichaelScheyttTobiasSoinKimSahlinKerstin. 2009. “Reputational Risk as a Logic of Organizing in Late Modernity.” Organization Studies30 (2&3): 301–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00604-w.
75.
QianJunxiYuanZhenhieLiJieZhuHong. 2020. “Science Citation Index (SCI) and Scientific Evaluation System in China.” Comment in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications7(1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00604-w.
76.
RingelLeopoldEspelandWendy NelsonSauderMichaelWerronTobias. 2021. “Worlds of Rankings.” In Research in the Sociology of Organizations 74, edited by RingelLeopoldEspelandWendySauderMichaelWerronTobias, 1–23. Bingley: Emerald.
77.
SauderMichaeEspelandWendy Nelson. 2009. “The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review74: 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400104.
78.
SergerSylvia SchwaagBreidneMagnus. 2007. “China’s Fifteen-Year Plan for Science and Technology: An Assessment.” Asia Policy4: 135–64. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2007.0013.
79.
Sfdora. “DORA—San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.” https://sfdora.org/ (accessed 28 November 2023).
ShenSubrina Xirong. 2015. “Negotiating Authorship in Chinese Universities: How Organizations Shape Cycles of Credit.” Science, Technology, & Human Values41 (4): 660–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915622265.
83.
ShuFeiLiuSichenLarivièreVincent. 2022. “China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?” Minerva, 60(3), 329–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09468-7.
84.
SismondoSergio.2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
85.
Sleeboom-FaulknerMargaret. 2004. Academic Nationalism in China and Japan: Framed by Concepts of Nature, Culture and the Universal. New York: Routledge.
State Council (General Office of the) (Policy document 11). 2021. Guiding Opinions on Improving the Evaluation Mechanism of Scientific and Technological Achievements (8 February 2021)《关于完善科技成果评价机制的指导意见》, http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-08/02/content_5629039.html (accessed 15 March 2023).
88.
The State Council (General Office of the State Council). 2019. (Policy document 6). Notice on Grasping and Implementing the Relevant Documents Conferring Greater Autonomy on Scientific Research Institutions and Staff (3 January 2019). 《国务院办公厅关于抓好赋予科研机构和人员更大自主权有关文件贯彻落实工作的通知》 https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2019-01/03/content_5354526.html (accessed 20 March 2023).
89.
The State Council (State Affairs Office of the State Council). 2018. (Policy document 5). Opinions on deepening the reform of the evaluation institutions for the evaluation of scientific research projects (7 April 2018).《深化科研项目评审人才评价机构评估改革》https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-07/04/content_5303293.html (accessed 25 May 2024).
90.
SuXinning.2017. “The Dialectical View of Academic Evaluation and Academic Assessment and Reward Mechanism”, 学术评价与学术考核奖励机制的辩证观, http://www.zhexueshi.com/paper/9048; originally published in Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities 9 (accessed 18 April 2023).
91.
SuXinning.2020. “CSSCI’始作俑者’怎么看’破除SCI至上’” (“How does the CSSCI ‘initiator’ think about breaking SCI the supremacy”). CSSCI”始作俑者”怎么看”破除SCI至上” (baidu.com) (accessed 3 January 2023).
92.
SunYutaoCaoCong. 2021. “Planning for Science: China’s ‘Grand Experiment’ and Global Implications.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications8 (215): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00895-7.
ValenzuelaFernando A.CortezMaria IsabelSáezMarielVera-GajardoAndrea. 2024. “Standardizing Excellence: Metric Assemblages in Mathematics Research in Chile.” Science, Technology and Human Values1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241284252.
95.
Von HippelEric.2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
96.
WangJessica Ching-Sze. 2007. John Dewey in China. To Teach and to Learn. New York: State University of New York Press.
97.
WangJing.2024. Listing Quality: Navigating Journal Valuation Practices in the Chinese Science System. Nijmegen: Radboud University, PhD thesis.
98.
WangJingHalffmanWillemHorbachSerge P.J.M.. 2024. “Listing Quality: Chinese Journal Lists in Incoherent Valuation Regimes.” Science and Public Policy51 (1): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad052.
99.
WangJingHalffmanWillemHorbachSerge P. J. M.. 2025. “The Journal Attention Cycle: Indicators as Assets in the Chinese Scientific Publishing System.” Science, Technology, & Human Values1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439251322530.
100.
WangJingHalffmanWillemZhangHelen Yuehong. 2023. “Sorting Out Journals: The Proliferation of Journal Lists in China.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology74 (10): 1207–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24816.
101.
WangJingHalffmanWillemZwartHub. 2021. “The Chinese Scientific Publication System: Specific Features, Specific Challenges.” Learned Publishing34 (2): 105–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1326.
102.
Wilsdon, James, Liz Allen, Eleonora Belfiore et al. 2015. The Metric Tide: report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e180.
XiaoYoudan.“Policy Interpretation: What Do Experts Critique on Project Evaluation, Talent Evaluation, Institutional Evaluation, and the ‘Three Evaluations’ Reform?” (政策解读)项目评审、人才评价、机构评估，”三评”改革看看科技界的人怎么说？), https://www.163.com/dy/article/DMOHPNS70518EAUK.html (accessed 28 November 2023).
105.
XuXin.2020. “China ‘Goes Out’ in a Centre–Periphery World: Incentivizing International Publications in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” Higher Education80: 157–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00470-9.
106.
YearleySteven.1996. Sociology, Environmentalism, Globalization: Reinventing the Globe. London: Sage.
