On Peer Review and Exchanges Unseen: Thank You to Our Reviewers 2023 and 2024

Bell Kirsten Kingori Patricia Mills David . 2024. “Scholarly Publishing, Boundary Processes, and the Problem of Fake Peer Reviews.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 49 (1): 78-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439221112463.

Chubin Daryl E. Hackett Edward J. . 1990. Peerless Science: Peer Review and US Science Policy. Binghamton, NY: State University of New York Press.

García-Deister Vivette . 2024. “On Conversation.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 7 (1): 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2024.2323309.

Greiffenhagen Christian . 2024. “Judging Importance Before Checking Correctness: Quick Opinions in Mathematical Peer Review.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 49 (4): 935-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439231203445.

Hackett Edward J . 2021. “The Ambivalence of Peer Review: Thank You ST&HV Reviewers 2019–2020.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 46 (4): 687-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211019475.

Hamann Julian Velarde Kathia Serrano . 2023. “The Emergence of the Academic Candidate: Evaluation as Textual Dramaturgy.” Valuation Studies 10 (1): 58-89. https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2023.10.1.58-89.

Kaltenbrunner Wolfgang Birch Kean Amuchastegui Maria . 2022. “Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 47 (4): 670-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211068798.

Lamont Michele l . 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lancaster Kari Neale Timothy Addison Courtney Kearnes Matthew . 2024. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces in Science and Technology Studies (STS). Editorial”. Science, Technology, & Human Values 49 (6): 1163-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241285624.

Pape Madeleine Latham Joe Karkazis Katrina Ritz Stacey . 2020. “Resisting and Remaking Sex in the Petri Dish, the Clinic, and on the Track.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6 (2): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v6i2.34505.

Parvin Nassim Rouse Rebecca Alvarez Diana Haghani Sanaz Clark Sharon Gaskins Nettrice R. Sullivan Anne , et al. 2022. “Mess and Making Matters in Feminist Teaching.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 8 (1): 1–45. https:/doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v8i1.37713.

Roumbanis Lambros . 2022. “Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 47 (6): 1302-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211026016.

Siler Kyle Strang David . 2017. “Peer Review and Scholarly Originality: Let 1,000 Flowers Bloom, But Don’t Step on Any.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 42 (1): 29-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916656919.

Woolgar Steve . 1989. “A Coffeehouse Conversation on the Possibility of Mechanizing Discovery and its Sociological Analysis.” Social Studies of Science 19 (4): 658-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019004008.