Innovations are central instruments of sustainability policies. They project future visions onto technological solutions and enable win-win framings of complex sustainability issues. Yet, they also create new problems by interconnecting different resources such as water, food, and energy, what is known as the “WEF nexus.” In this paper, we apply a new approach called Quantitative Storytelling (QST) to the assessment of four innovations with a strong nexus component in EU policy: biofuels, shale gas, electric vehicles, and alternative water resources. Recognizing irreducible pluralism and uncertainties, QST inspects the relationships between the narratives used to frame sustainability issues and the evidence on those issues. Our experiences outlined two rationales for implementing QST. First, QST can be used to question dominant narratives that promote certain innovations despite evidence against their effectiveness. Second, QST can offer avenues for pluralistic processes of co-creation of alternative narratives and imaginaries. We reflect on the implementation of QST and on the role played by different uncertainties throughout these processes. Our experiences suggest that while the role of nexus assessments using both numbers and narratives may not be instrumental in directly inducing policy change, they are valuable means to open discussions on innovations outside of dominant nexus imaginaries.
AlbrechtTamee R.CrootofAricaScottChristopher A.. 2018. “The Water-energy-food Nexus: A Systematic Review of Methods for Nexus Assessment.” Environmental Research Letters13 (4): 043002.
2.
AllenTimothy F. H.GiampietroMario. 2006. “Narratives and Transdisciplines for a Post-industrial World.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science23 (5): 595–615. doi: 10.1002/sres.792.
3.
BerridgeG. R.JamesAlan. 2003. Constructive Ambiguity. A Dictionary of Diplomacy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
4.
BorupMadsBrownNikKonradKorneliaLenteHarro van. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management18 (3-4): 285–98.
5.
BrugnachMarcelaIngramHelen. 2012. “Ambiguity: The Challenge of Knowing and Deciding Together.” Environmental Science & Policy15 (1): 60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.005.
CabelloVioletaRomeroDavidMusickiAnaPereiraÂngela GuimarãesPeñateBaltasar. 2021. “Co-creating Narratives for WEF Nexus Governance: A Quantitative Story-telling Case Study in the Canary Islands.” Sustainability Science16 (4): 1363–74. doi: 10.1007/s11625-021-00933-y.
8.
Cadillo-BenalcazarJuan J.BukkensSandra G. F.RipaMaddalenaGiampietroMario. 2021. “Why Does the European Union Produce Biofuels? Examining Consistency and Plausibility in Prevailing Narratives with Quantitative Storytelling.”Energy Research & Social Science71(January): 101810. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101810.
9.
CairnsRoseKrzywoszynskaAnna. 2016. “Anatomy of a Buzzword: The Emergence of ‘the Water-energy-food Nexus’ in UK Natural Resource Debates.” Environmental Science & Policy64 (October): 164–70. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.007.
10.
ChengJay J.TimilsinaGovinda R.. 2011. “Status and Barriers of Advanced Biofuel Technologies: A Review.” Renewable Energy36 (12): 3541–49.
11.
Di FeliceLouisa J.RennerAnselGiampietroMario. 2021. “Why Should the EU Implement Electric Vehicles? Viewing the Relationship between Evidence and Dominant Policy Solutions through the Lens of Complexity.” Environmental Science & Policy123 (September): 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.002.
EC. 2012. Energy Roadmap 2050. Brussels, Belgium: EC.
15.
EC. 2013. Communication […] Clean Power for Transport: A European Alternative Fuels Strategy. Brussels, Belgium: EC.
16.
EC. 2014a. “Directive 2014/94/EU […] on the Deployment of Alternative Fuels Infrastructure.” Official Journal of the European Union L 307.
17.
EC. 2014b. “2014/70/EU: Commission Recommendation of 22 January 2014 on Minimum Principles for the Exploration and Production of Hydrocarbons (Such as Shale Gas) Using High-volume Hydraulic Fracturing.” 32014H0070. OJ L. Vol. 039. Accessed February 15, 2020. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2014/70/oj/eng.
FuntowiczSilvio O.RavetzJerome R.. 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Vol. 15. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
20.
FuntowiczSilvio O.RavetzJerome R.. 1993. “Science for the Post-normal Age.” Futures25 (7): 739–55. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.
21.
GiampietroMario. 2018. “Anticipation in Agriculture.” In Handbook of Anticipation: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of Future in Decision Making, edited by PoliRoberto, 1–35. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_23-1.
22.
GiampietroMarioAspinallRichard J.Ramos-MartinJesusBukkensSandra G. F.. 2014. Resource Accounting for Sustainability Assessment: The Nexus between Energy, Food, Water and Land Use. New York: Routledge.
23.
GiampietroMarioBukkensSandra G. F.. 2015. “Analogy between Sudoku and the Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Societal Metabolism.” Ecological Informatics, Ecosystem Metabolism towards Sustainable Society Design and Management26 (March): 18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.07.007.
24.
GiampietroMarioFuntowiczSilvio O.. 2020. “From Elite Folk Science to the Policy Legend of the Circular Economy.” Environmental Science & Policy109 (July): 64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.012.
25.
GiampietroMarioMayumiKozoRamos-MartinJesus. 2009. “Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Societal and Ecosystem Metabolism (MuSIASEM): Theoretical Concepts and Basic Rationale.” Energy, WESC 200634 (3): 313–22. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.020.
26.
GiattiLeandro L.2019. Participatory Research in the Post-normal Age: Unsustainability and Uncertainties to Rethink Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London, UK: Springer.
27.
HarwoodStephen A.2018. “In Search of a (WEF) Nexus Approach.” Environmental Science & Policy83 (May): 79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.020.
JasanoffSheila. 2007. “Technologies of Humility.” Nature450 (7166): 33–33. doi: 10.1038/450033a.
30.
JasanoffSheilaKimSang-Hyun. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
KovacicZoraFeliceLouisa J. Di. 2019. “Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity: Implications for European Union Energy Governance.” Energy Research & Social Science53 (2019): 159–69.
33.
KovacicZoraGiampietroMario. 2015. “Beyond ‘Beyond GDP Indicators:’ The Need for Reflexivity in Science for Governance.” Ecological Complexity21 (C): 53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.11.007.
LevidowLes. 2013. “EU Criteria for Sustainable Biofuels: Accounting for Carbon, Depoliticising Plunder.” Geoforum, Global Production Networks, Labour and Development44 (January): 211–23. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.09.005.
36.
LonghurstNoelChilversJason. 2019. “Mapping Diverse Visions of Energy Transitions: Co-producing Sociotechnical Imaginaries.” Sustainability Science14 (4): 973–90. doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00702-y.
MatlandRichard E.1995. “Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-conflict Model of Policy Implementation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory5 (2): 145–74.
39.
MatthewsK. B.BlackstockK. L.RivingtonM.WaylenK.MillerD. G.Wardell-JohnsonD.KovacicZ.RennerA.RipaM.GiampietroM.2017 “Delivering more than the “Sum of the Parts” - Using Quantitative Story Telling to Address the Challenges of Conducting Science for Policy in the EU Land, Water and Energy Nexus.” In: MODSIM2017, 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, edited by SymeG.HattonMacDonald, D.FultonB.PiantadosiJ.Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, 15–21. http://magic-nexus.eu/documents/delivering-more-“sum-parts”-using-quantitative-story-telling-address-challenges-conducting”. DOI: 10.36334/modsim.2017.Keynote.matthews.
NorströmAlbert V.CvitanovicChristopherLöfMarie F.WestSimonWybornCarinaBalvaneraPatriciaBednarekAngela T.BennettElena M.BiggsReinetteBremondAriane de. 2020. “Principles for Knowledge Co-production in Sustainability Research.” Nature Sustainability3 (3): 182–90. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2.
42.
PfotenhauerSebastianJasanoffSheila. 2017. “Panacea or Diagnosis? Imaginaries of Innovation and the ‘MIT Model’ in Three Political Cultures:” Social Studies of Science47 (6): 783–810. doi: 10.1177/0306312717706110.
43.
RipaMaddalenaCadillo-BenalcazarJuan J.GiampietroMario. 2021. “Cutting through the Biofuel Confusion: A Conceptual Framework to Check the Feasibility, Viability and Desirability of Biofuels.” Energy Strategy Reviews35 (May): 100642. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100642.
RosenRobert. 1991. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
46.
SaltelliAndreaGiampietroMario. 2017. “What Is Wrong with Evidence Based Policy, and How Can It Be Improved?” Futures, Post-Normal Science in Practice91 (August): 62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.012.
47.
Serrano-TovarTarikSuárezBaltasar PeñateMusickiAnaJuanA.CabelloVioletaGiampietroMario. 2019. “Structuring an Integrated Water-energy-food Nexus Assessment of a Local Wind Energy Desalination System for Irrigation.” Science of the Total Environment689 (2019): 945–57. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.422.
48.
StirlingAndy. 2003. “Risk, Uncertainty and Precaution: Some Instrumental Implications from the Social Sciences.” In Negotiating Environmental Change, edited by BerkhoutF.LeachM.ScoonesI., 33–76. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
49.
StirlingAndy. 2008. “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values33 (2): 262–94. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311265.
50.
TurnhoutEstherMetzeTamaraWybornCarinaKlenkNicoleLouderElena. 2020. “The Politics of Co-production: Participation, Power, and Transformation.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Advancing the Science of Actionable Knowledge for Sustainability42 (February): 15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009.
51.
UrbinattiAlberto MatenhauerFontanaMichele D.StirlingAndyGiattiLeandro L.. 2020. “‘Opening up’ the Governance of Water-energy-food Nexus: Towards a Science-policy-society Interface Based on Hybridity and Humility.” Science of the Total Environment744 (November): 140945. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140945.
52.
Van GeveltTerry.2020. “The Water–Energy–Food Nexus: Bridging the Science–Policy Divide.” Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, Environmental Monitoring Assessment: Water-energy-food Nexus13 (February): 6–10. doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2019.09.008.
53.
WynneBrian. 1992. “Uncertainty and Environmental Learning: Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Paradigm.” Global Environmental Change2 (2): 111–27.
54.
ZellmerAmanda J.AllenTimothy F. H.KesseboehmerKirsten. 2006. “The Nature of Ecological Complexity: A Protocol for Building the Narrative.” Ecological Complexity3 (3): 171–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2006.06.002.
