Recent discussions on technology and gender-violence prevention emphasize that technoscientific applications often advance pro-punishment logics that enact gendered inequalities. Less attention has focused on racialized dimensions and how technology might advance abolitionist and transformative justice agendas. In response, this article considers how inventors mobilize technology as a frontline response to sexual violence, in which technoscience—rather than police—enables individuals, friends, and family to provide safety and mutual aid. Through analysis of seven popular technologies produced between 2010 and 2020, this paper documents how their “abolitionist sensibility” is accompanied by fellow-traveler discourses that are unattuned to intersecting power relations. Findings suggest that while this sociotechnical imaginary is reacting to state power, it reinforces a race-neutral and techno-optimistic vision for building a violence-free future. These power-evasive politics may thus signal increased susceptibility to carceral creep and coercive surveillant regimes. After discussing these double-edge politics, I conclude by discussing power formations that are left unexamined in the imaginary and how to cultivate a counter-carceral praxis in line with transformative justice goals.
BeatonBrian. 2015. “Safety as Net Work: ‘Apps Against Abuse’ and the Digital Labour of Sexual Assault Prevention.” MediaTropesV (1): 105–24.
6.
BenjaminRuha. 2019. Race after Technology. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
7.
BivensRenaHasinoffAmy Adele. 2018. “Rape: Is There an App for That? An Empirical Analysis of the Features of Anti-rape Apps.” Information, Communication & Society21 (8): 1050–67.
8.
BrowneSimone. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
CantorDavidFisherBonnieChibnallSusanTownsendReanneLeeHyunshikBruceCarolThomasGail. 2015. Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct. Lincoln, NE: Association of American Universities.
EubanksVirginia. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
17.
HigginbothamEvelyn. 1992 “African-American Women’s History and the Metalanguage of Race.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society17 (2): 251–74.
18.
JasanoffSheila. 2015. “Future Imperfect.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by JasanoffSheilaKimSang-Hyun, 1–33. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
JasanoffSheilaKimSang-Hyun. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva47 (2): 119–46.
20.
JeffersonBrian. 2020. Digitize and Punish: Racial Criminalization in the Digital Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
KabaMariame. 2021. We Do This ‘Til We Free Us: Abolitionist Organizing and Transforming Justice. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
22.
KenneyMarthaMamoLaura. 2020. “The Imaginary of Precision Public Health.” Medical Humanities46 (3): 192–203.
23.
KimMimi. 2020. “The Carceral Creep: Gender-based Violence, Race, and the Expansion of the Punitive State, 1973-1983.” Social Problems67 (2): 251–69.
24.
KroløkkeCharlotte. 2019. “Frosties: Feminist Cultural Analysis of Frozen Cells and Seeds Documentaries.” European Journal of Cultural Studies22 (5-6): 528–44.
25.
LonswayKimberlyFitzgeraldLouise. 1994. “Rape Myths: In Review.” Psychology of Women Quarterly18 (2): 133–64.
MasonCorinne LysandraMagnetShoshana. 2012. “Surveillance Studies and Violence against Women.” Surveillance & Society10 (2): 105–18.
28.
McCaugheyMarthaCermeleJill. 2017. “Changing the Hidden Curriculum of Campus Rape Prevention and Education: Women’s Self-defense as a Key Protective Factor for a Public Health Model of Prevention.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse18 (3): 287–302.
ParvinNassimPollockAnne. 2020. “Unintended by Design: On the Political Uses of ‘Unintended Consequences.’” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society6 (2020): 320–27.
32.
PickersgillMartyn. 2011. “Connecting Neuroscience and Law: Anticipatory Discourse and the Role of Sociotechnical Imaginaries.” New Genetics and Society30 (1): 27–40.
33.
QuinlanAndrea. 2017. The Technoscientific Witness of Rape: Contentious Histories of Law, Feminism, and Forensic Science. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
34.
QuinlanAndrea. 2020. “Visions of Public Safety, Justice, and Healing: The Making of the Rape Kit Backlog in the United States.” Social & Legal Studies29 (2): 225–45.
35.
RichieBeth. 2000. “A Black Feminist Reflection on the Antiviolence Movement.” Signs25 (4): 1133–37.
36.
RichieBeth. 2012. Arrested Justice. New York: New York University Press.
37.
RitchieAndrea. 2017. Invisible No More: Police Violence against Black Women and Women of Color. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
SadowskiJathanBendorRoy. 2019. “Selling Smartness: Corporate Narratives and the Smart City as a Sociotechnical Imaginary.” Science, Technology, & Human Values44 (3): 540–63.
40.
ShelbyRenee Marie. 2019. “Techno-physical Feminism: Anti-rape Technology, Gender, and Corporeal Surveillance.” Feminist Media Studies20 (8): 1088–109.
41.
SimKate. 2021. “Respond and Resolve: A Critical Feminist Inquiry for Technologies of Sexual Governance.” Global Perspectives2 (1): 25434.
42.
ThumaEmily. 2015. “Lessons in Defense: Gender Violence, Racial Criminalization, and Anticarceral Feminism.” Women’s Studies Quarterly43 (3/4): 52–71.
43.
TimmermansStefanTavoryIddo. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory30 (3): 167–86.
44.
WhalleyElizabethHackettColleen. 2017. “Carceral Feminisms: The Abolitionist Project and Undoing Dominant Feminisms.” Contemporary Justice Review20 (4): 456–73.
45.
WhiteDeborahMcMillanLesley. 2020. “Innovating the Problem Away? A Critical Study of Anti-rape Technologies.” Violence Against Women26 (10): 1120–40.
46.
WhiteDeborahReesGethin. 2014. “Self-defense or Undermining the Self? Exploring the Possibilities and Limitations of a Novel Anti-rape Technology.” Violence Against Women20 (3): 360–68.
