Research on the influence of industry on chemical regulation has mostly been conducted within the framework of the production of ignorance. This special issue extends this research by looking at how industry asserts its interests––not just in the scientific sphere but also at other stages of policy-making and regulatory process––with a specific focus on the types of tools or instruments industry has used. Bringing together sociologists and historians specialized in Science and Technology Studies (STS), the articles of the special issue study the arenas in which instruments and practical guidelines for public policy are negotiated or used. The aim is to observe the devices in the making or in action, from the selection of actors to the production of thresholds, criteria, and other technical regulations. The introduction highlights how industry influence on expertise and regulation is undoubtedly far more pervasive and multifarious than has been conceptualized to date by social scientists. Putting this issue back at the heart of both the STS and social sciences research agendas is increasingly urgent and could lead to new inquiries able to highlight these logics even more widely, using fresh empirical examples.
AbrahamJohnBallingerRachel. 2012. “The Neoliberal Regulatory State, Industry Interests, and the Ideological Penetration of Scientific Knowledge: Deconstructing the Redefinition of Carcinogens in Pharmaceuticals.” Science, Technology, & Human Values37 (5): 443–77.
2.
AguitonSara A.DéplaudeMarc-OlivierJasNathalieHenryEmmanuelThomasValentin, eds. 2021. Pervasive Powers: The Politics of Corporate Authority. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.
3.
AnsellChristopher K.VogelDavid, eds. 2006. What’s the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety. Politics, Science, and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BoudiaSoraya. 2014. “Managing Scientific and Political Uncertainty. Environmental Risk Assessment in a Historical Perspective.” In Powerless Science? Science and Politics in a Toxic World, edited by BoudiaSorayaJasNathalie, 95–112. Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.
5.
BoudiaSorayaCreagerAngela N. H.FrickelScottHenryEmmanuelJasNathalieReinhardtCarstenRobertsJody A.. 2021. Residues: Thinking through Chemical Environments. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6.
BoudiaSorayaJasNathalie. 2014. Powerless Science? Science and Politics in a Toxic World. Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.
7.
BoullierHenri. 2019. Toxiques légaux. Comment les firmes chimiques ont mis la main sur le contrôle de leurs produits. Paris, France: La Découverte.
BrickmanRonald. 1984. “Science and the Politics of Toxic Chemical Regulation: U.S. and European Contrasts.” Science, Technology, & Human Values9 (1): 107–11. doi: 10.1177/016224398400900112.
10.
BrickmanRonaldJasanoffSheilaIlgenThomas L.. 1985. Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
CarpenterDaniel. 2010. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
CarpenterDaniel. 2014. “Chapter 7. Corrosive Capture? The Dueling Forces of Autonomy and Industry Influence in FDA Pharmaceutical Regulation.” In Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It, edited by MossDavid A.CarpenterDaniel, 152–172. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CasperMonica J., ed. 2003. Synthetic Planet: Chemical Politics and the Hazards of Modern Life. New York: Routledge.
14.
ChorevNitsan. 2013. “Restructuring Neoliberalism at the World Health Organization.” Review of International Political Economy20 (4): 627–66.
15.
CranorCarl F.1997. Regulating Toxic Substances: A Philosophy of Science and the Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
CrouchColin. 2011. The Strange Non-death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
17.
DardotPierreLavalChristianElliottGregory. 2014. The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. New York: Verso.
18.
DaviesThomMahAlice. 2020. Toxic Truths: Environmental Justice and Citizen Science in a Post-truth Age. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
19.
DemortainDavid. 2017. “Expertise, Regulatory Science and the Evaluation of Technology and Risk: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Minerva55 (2): 139–59. doi: 10.1007/s11024-017-9325-1.
20.
DemortainDavid. 2020. The Science of Bureaucracy. Risk Decision-making and the US Environmental Protection Agency. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
DjelicMarie-LaureSahlin-AnderssonKerstin. 2006. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
FrickelScottEdwardsMichelle. 2014. “Untangling Ignorance in Environmental Risk Assessment.” In Powerless Science? Science and Politics in a Toxic World, edited by BoudiaSorayaJasNathalie, 215–33. Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.
23.
FrickelScottMooreKelly. 2006. The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
24.
GlantzStanton A.1998. The Cigarette Papers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
GrandjeanPhilippeEriksenMette L.EllegaardOleWallinJohan A.. 2011. “The Matthew Effect in Environmental Science Publication: A Bibliometric Analysis of Chemical Substances in Journal Articles.” Environmental Health10 (2011): 96. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-96.
26.
GrossMatthiasMcGoeyLinsey, eds. 2015. Handbook of Ignorance Studies. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
27.
HanssonSven Ove. 1998. Setting the Limit: Occupational Health Standards and the Limits of Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
HarveyDavid. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
HaurayBoris. 2006. L’Europe du médicament: Politique, expertise, intérêts privés. Paris, France: Presses de Sciences Po.
30.
HenryEmmanuel. 2017. Ignorance scientifique et inaction publique: Les politiques de santé au travail. Paris, France: Presses de Sciences Po.
31.
Hepler-SmithEvan. 2019. “Molecular Bureaucracy: Toxicological Information and Environmental Protection.” Environmental History24 (3): 534–60. doi: 10.1093/envhis/emy134.
32.
HessDavid J.2016. Undone Science. Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
JasNathalie. 2013. “Adapting to ‘Reality’: The Emergence of an International Expertise on Food Additives and Contaminants in the 1950’s and Early 1960’s.” In Toxicants, Health and Regulation since 1945, edited by BoudiaSorayaJasNathalie, 47–69. London, UK: Pickering and Chatto.
34.
JasNathalie. 2014. “Gouverner les substances chimiques dangereuses dans les espaces internationaux.” In Le gouvernement des technosciences. Gouverner le progrès depuis1945, edited by PestreDominique, 31–63. Paris, France: La Découverte.
35.
JasanoffSheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
JasanoffSheila. 2011. “The Practices of Objectivity in Regulatory Science.” In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by CharlesCamicNeilGrossLamontMichèleSheilaJasanoff, 307–39. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
37.
LascoumesPierreGalesPatrick Le. 2007. “Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments? From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation.” Governance20 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x.
38.
LaveRebeccaMirowskiPhilipRandallsSamuel. 2010. “Introduction: STS and Neoliberal Science.” Social Studies of Science40 (5): 659–75.
39.
Le GalèsPatrick. 2016. “Neoliberalism and Urban Change: Stretching a Good Idea Too Far?” Territory, Politics, Governance4 (2): 154–72.
40.
LiboironM.TironiM.CalvilloN.. 2018. “Toxic Politics: Acting in a Permanently Polluted World.” Social Studies of Science48 (3): 331–49. doi: 10.1177/0306312718783087.
41.
LindnerLine Friis. 2008. “Regulating Food Safety: The Power of Alignment and Drive towards Convergence.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research21 (2): 133–43. doi: 10.1080/13511610802214487.
42.
MarkowitzGeraldRosnerDavid. 2002. Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
McGarityThomas O.WagnerWendy Elizabeth. 2008. Bending Science. How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research. London, UK: Harvard University Press.
44.
McGoeyLinsey. 2012. “The Logic of Strategic Ignorance.” British Journal of Sociology63 (3): 553–76.
45.
MichaelsDavid. 2008. Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
MichaelsDavid. 2020. The Triumph of Doubt: Dark Money and the Science of Deception. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
MooreKellyKleinmanDaniel LeeHessDavidFrickelScott. 2011. “Science and Neoliberal Globalization: A Political Sociological Approach.” Theory and Society40 (5): 505–32. doi: 10.1007/s11186-011-9147-3.
48.
PlehweDieterWalpenBernhardNeunhöfferGisela, eds. 2006. Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
49.
ProctorRobert N.2011. Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
ProctorRobert N.SchiebingerLonda L., eds. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
51.
RichterLaurenCordnerAlissaBrownPhil. 2018. “Non-stick Science: Sixty Years of Research and (in)Action on Fluorinated Compounds.” Social Studies of Science48 (5): 691–714. doi: 10.1177/0306312718799960.
52.
RichterLaurenCordnerAlissaBrownPhil. 2020, October. “Producing Ignorance through Regulatory Structure: The Case of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).” Sociological Perspectives64 (4): 631–56. doi: 10.1177/0731121420964827.
53.
RossBenjaminAmterSteven. 2010. The Polluters: The Making of Our Chemically Altered Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
RushefskyMark E.1986. Making Cancer Policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
55.
SelinHenrik. 2010. Global Governance of Hazardous Chemicals: Challenges of Multilevel Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
ShostakSara. 2013. Exposed Science. Genes, the Environment, and the Politics of Population Health. Berkeley: University of California Press.
57.
SuryanarayananSainathKleinmanDaniel Lee. 2017. Vanishing Bees: Science, Politics, and Honeybee Health. Nature, Society, and Culture. New Brunswick, CA: Rutgers University Press.
58.
VogelDavid. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
