One hundred years ago, in his lecture Science as a Vocation, Max Weber prefigured a transition from science as a calling to science as bureaucratically organized work. He argued that a calling for science is critical for sustaining scientific work. Using Weber’s arguments for science as a vocation as a lens, in this paper, we discuss whether a calling for science may become difficult to maintain in increasingly bureaucratized scientific work—and also whether such a calling is necessary for the advance of science. We present empirical evidence for this bureaucratization of scientific work and further develop Weber’s discussion of science by contrasting it with the views of other theorists of science and innovation. Finally, we discuss the implications of these theories, develop a set of policy recommendations, and outline a research agenda designed to develop science policies and a sociology of science that match this shift from vocation to bureaucracy in scientific work.
BabaYasunoriWalshJohn P.. 2010. “Embeddedness, Social Epistemology and Breakthrough Innovation.”Research Policy39 (4): 511–22.
2.
BarleyS. R.BechkyB.. 1994. “In the Backrooms of Science.”Work and Occupations21 (1): 85–126.
3.
BiagioliMario. 2003. “Rights or Rewards?” In Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, edited by BiagioliMarionGalisonPeter, 253–80. New York: Routledge.
4.
BiagioliMario. 2018. “Quality to Impact, Text to Metadata.”KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge2 (2): 249–75. doi: 10.1086/699152.
5.
BlauPeter M.1970. “A Formal Theory of Differentiation in Organizations.”American Sociological Review35 (2): 201–18.
6.
BlauPeter M. 1994. The Organization of Academic Work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
BravermanHarry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
9.
BundersonJ. StuartThompsonJeffery A.. 2009. “The Call of the Wild.”Administrative Science Quarterly54 (1): 32–57. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32.
10.
Chatelain-PonroyStéphanieMignot-GérardStéphanieMusselinChristineSponemSamuel. 2018. “Is Commitment to Performance-based Management Compatible with Commitment to University ‘Public-ness?’”Organization Studies39 (10): 1357–76.
ChinoyEly. 1955. Automobile Workers and the American Dream. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.
13.
DuffyRyan D.DikBryan J.. 2013. “Research on Calling.”Journal of Vocational Behavior83 (3): 428–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.006.
14.
EtzkowitzHenry. 1983. “Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic Science.”Minerva21 (2/3): 198–233.
15.
FeldonDavid F.LitsonKayleeJeongSoojeongBlaneyJennifer M.KangJinaMillerCandaceGriffinKimberlyRoksaJosipa. 2019. “Postdocs’ Lab Engagement Predicts Trajectories of PhD Students’ Skill Development.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116 (42): 20910–16.
16.
FuchsStephan. 1992. The Professional Quest for Truth. Albany: SUNY Press.
GoodmanPaul S.RamanujamRangarajCarrollJohn S.EdmondsonAmy C.HofmannDavid A.SutcliffeKathleen M.. 2011. “Organizational Errors.”Research in Organizational Behavior31 (2011): 151–76. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.003.
19.
HackettEdward J. 1987. “The Plight of Academic ‘Marginals.’” The Scientist [online edition]1 (18).
20.
HackettEdward J.1990. “Science as a Vocation in the 1990s.”Journal of Higher Education61 (3): 241–79.
21.
HackettEdward J.1994. “A Social Control Perspective on Scientific Misconduct.”The Journal of Higher Education65 (3): 242–60. doi: 10.1080/00221546.1994.11778499.
22.
HaeusslerCarolinSauermannHenry. 2016. “The Division of Labor in Teams.” National Bureau of Economic Research (number 22241), Cambridge, MA.
23.
HagstromWarren O.1964. “Traditional and Modern Forms of Scientific Teamwork.”Administrative Science Quarterly9 (3): 241–63.
24.
HargensLowell L.1975. Patterns of Scientific Research. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
25.
HochschildArlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
HollingsworthJ. Rogers. 2004. “Institutionalizing Excellence in Biomedical Research.” In Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, edited by StapletonDarwin H., 17–63. New York: Rockefeller University Press.
27.
HongWei. 2008. “Domination of a Scientific Field.”Social Studies of Science38 (4): 543–70.
28.
JabbehdariSahraWalshJohn P.. 2017. “Authorship Norms and Project Structures in Science.”Science, Technology, & Human Values42 (5): 872–900. doi: 10.1177/0162243917697192.
29.
JohnsonDavid R.2017. A Fractured Profession. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
LarivièreVincentDesrochersNadineMacalusoBenoîtMongeonPhilippePaul-HusAdèleSugimotoCassidy R.. 2016. “Contributorship and Division of Labor in Knowledge Production.”Social Studies of Science46 (3): 417–35.
32.
LatourBrunoWoolgarSteve. 1979. Laboratory Life. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
MertonRobert K.1957. “Priorities in Scientific Discovery.”American Sociological Review22 (6): 635–59.
40.
MertonRobert K.1973. The Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
41.
MilojevićStaša. 2014. “Principles of Scientific Research Team Formation and Evolution.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111 (11): 3984–89.
42.
MilojevićStaša. 2015. “Quantifying the Cognitive Extent of Science.”Journal of Informetrics9 (4): 962–73. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.10.005.
43.
MilojevićStašaRadicchiFilippoWalshJohn P.. 2018. “Changing Demographics of Scientific Careers.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115 (50): 12616–23.
44.
MoreCharles. 1980. Skill and the English Working Class, 1870-1914. New York: St Martin’s Press.
45.
MoweryDavid C.ShaneScott. 2002. “Introduction to the Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer.”Management Science48 (1): v–ix. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.0.14277.
46.
MurayamaKotaNireiMakotoShimizuHiroshi. 2015. “Management of Science, Serendipity, and Research performance.”Research Policy44 (4): 862–73. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.018.
47.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. 2016. Optimizing the Nation’s Investment in Academic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
48.
National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
49.
National Research Council. 1981. Postdoctoral Appointments and Disappointments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
50.
National Research Council. 1998. Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
51.
National Research Council. 2005. Bridges to independence: Fostering the Independence of New Investigators in Biomedical Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
RiemerJeffrey W.1976. “Mistakes at Work.”Social Problems23 (3): 255–67.
54.
RobinsonRichard N. S.BarronPaul E.. 2007. “Developing a Framework for Understanding the Impact of Deskilling and Standardisation on the Turnover and Attrition of Chefs.”International Journal of Hospitality Management26 (4): 913–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.10.002.
55.
RothJulius A.1966. “Hired Hand Research.”The American Sociologist1 (4): 190–96.
56.
SauermannHenryHaeusslerCarolin. 2017. “Authorship and Contribution Disclosures.”Science Advances3 (11): e1700404.
57.
SchumpeterJoseph A.1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
58.
ShibayamaSotaroBabaYasunoriWalshJohn P.. 2015. “Organizational Design of University Laboratories.”Research Policy44 (3): 610–22. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.003.
59.
ShinnTerry. 1982. “Scientific Disciplines and Organizational Specificity.” In Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, edited by EliasN.MartinsH.WhitleyRichard P., 239–64. Dordrecht, Holland: Springer.
60.
StinchcombeA. L.1986. “The Mathematical Biology of Survey Research Centers.” In Stratification and Organization, edited by StinchcombeA. L., 337–46. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SwatezGerald M.1966. “Social Organization of a University Laboratory.”Unpublished dissertation, Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
62.
TeichA.1982. “Research Centers and Non-faculty Researchers.” In Research in the Age of the Steady-state University, edited by PhillipsD. I.ShenB. P. S., 91–108. Boulder, CO: Westview.
63.
WalkerC. R.GuestR. H.. 1952. The Man on the Assembly Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
WalshJohn P.1989. “Technological Change and the Division of Labor.”Work and Occupations16 (2): 165–83.
65.
WalshJohn P.LeeYou-Na. 2015. “The Bureaucratization of Science.”Research Policy44 (8): 1584–600.
WarrenDanielle E.2003. “Constructive and Destructive Deviance in Organizations.”The Academy of Management Review28 (4): 622–32. doi: 10.2307/30040751.
68.
WeberMax. 1930. “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.” Translated by ParsonsTalcott. (Routledge Classics ed.). New York: Routledge.
69.
WeberMax. 1946a. “Politics as a Vocation.” In Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by GerthH. H.MillsW., 77–128. New York: Oxford University Press.
70.
WeberMax. 1946b. “Science as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by GerthH. H.Wright MillsC., 129–56. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
WeberMax. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
72.
WerthBarry. 1994. The Billion-dollar Molecule. New York: Simon & Schuster.
73.
WhitleyR.2007. “Changing Governance of the Public Sciences.” In The Changing Governance of the Sciences, edited by WhitleyRichardGläserJochen, 1–25. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
74.
WuLingfeiWangDashunEvansJames A.. 2019. “Large Teams Develop and Small Teams Disrupt Science and Technology.”Nature566 (7744): 378–82. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9.
75.
WuchtyStefanJonesBenjamin F.UzziBrian. 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.”Science316 (5827): 1036–39.
