Science and technology studies (STS) scholars have turned their attention to the materiality of objects and buildings in order to examine what they make users do in practice. Taking a close look at a therapeutic community in a psychiatric day care center for teenagers, this paper joins these discussions by exploring the materiality of “spaces of care” as part of the center’s everyday practice. The analysis incorporates the concepts of scripts and dispositifs to describe the conditions of possibility in which caregivers and youths may position themselves in relation to others and to the space itself. This paper describes how spaces of care offer open, enticing, and variable conditions for fostering a dynamic of personal and relational responses as part of the care work. In this sense, the material environment entails potentialities in ways that are unpredictable but nonetheless consequential. Rather than arguing that material arrangements and things act, this paper draws attention to their impact via their potential within dispositifs of care that request participants’ attentiveness and responsiveness. Describing these potentialities brings out the subtler requirements of material environments in care practices that aim at circumventing the coercion of disciplinary spaces and their impersonal classifications.
AkrichMadeleine. 1992. “The De-scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by BijkerWiebe E.LawJohn, 205–24. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2.
AkrichMadeleine. 2010. “Retour sur ‘Comment décrire les objets techniques’.” Techniques & Culture54 (55): 202–04.
3.
AkrichMadeleineLatourBruno. 1992. “A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by BijkerWiebe E.LawJohn, 259–64. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4.
BessyChristianChateauraynaudFrancis. 1995. Experts et faussaires: Pour une sociologie de la perception. Paris, France: Editions Métailié.
5.
BouchyDenis. 1981. L’usine et son espace. Paris, France: Editions de la Villette.
6.
BuseChristinaMartinDarylNettletonSarah. 2018. “Conceptualising ‘Materialities of Care’: Making Visible Mundane Material Culture in Health and Social Care Contexts.” Sociology of Health & Illness40 (2): 243–55. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12663.
7.
BussoliniJeffrey. 2010. “What is a Dispositive?” Foucault Studies10 (2010): 85–107.
8.
CallonMichel. 1986. “Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction: La domestication des coquilles saint-jacques et des marins pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc.” L’Année Sociologique36 (1986): 169–208.
9.
CallonMichelLawJohn. 1982. “On Interests and Their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-enrolment.” Social Studies of Science12 (4): 615–25.
10.
CochoyFranck. 2016. On Curiosity: The Art of Market Seduction. Translated by LiraJaciara T.. Manchester, UK: Mattering Press.
11.
DriessenAnnelieke. 2019. “Dementia Matters: User-building Interactions Shaping Institutional Life in the Netherlands.” Medical Anthropology: Cross Cultural Studies in Health and Illness39 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2019.1589464.
12.
FoucaultMichel. 1980. “The Confession of the Flesh.” In Power/ Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings. 1972–1977, edited by GordonColin, 194–228. New York: Pantheon Books.
13.
FoucaultMichel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by SheridanAlan. New York: Vintage Books.
14.
GeslerWilbert. 1992. “Therapeutic Landscapes: Medical Issues in Light of the New Cultural Geography.” Social Science & Medicine34 (7): 735–46.
15.
GibsonJames. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
GierynThomas. 2002. “What Buildings Do.” Theory and Society31 (1): 35–74.
17.
GuggenheimMichael. 2013. “Unifying and Decomposing Building Types: How to Analyze the Change of Use of Sacred Buildings.” Qualitative Sociology36 (4): 445–64. doi: 10.1007/s11133-013-9262-8.
HennionAntoineGomartEmilieMaisonneuveSophie. 2000. Figures de l’amateur: Formes, objets, pratiques de l’amour de la musique aujourd’hui. Paris, France: La Documentation Française.
20.
HirschauerStefan. 2005. “On Doing Being a Stranger: The Practical Constitution of Civil Inattention.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior35 (1): 41–67. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8308.2005.00263.x.
JonesJulia. 2001. “The Geography of Mental Health.” Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale10 (4): 219–24.
23.
LatourBruno. 1988a. “Irreductions.” In The Pasteurization of France, translated by SheridanAlanLawJohn, 153–236. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
LatourBruno. 1988b. “Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-closer.” Social Problems35 (3): 298–310.
25.
LatourBruno. 1996. “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity3 (4): 228–45.
26.
LawJohn. 2009. “Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by TurnerBryan, 141–58. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
27.
LawsJennifer. 2009. “Reworking Therapeutic Landscapes: The Spatiality of an ‘Alternative’ Self-help Group.” Social Science & Medicine69 (12): 1827–33.
28.
MarkusThomas. 1993. Buildings and Power: Freedom and Control in the Origin of Modern Building Types. London, UK: Routledge.
29.
MartinDarylNettletonSarahBuseChristinaPriorLindsayTwiggJulia. 2015. “Architecture and Health Care: A Place for Sociology.” Sociology of Health & Illness37 (7): 1007–22.
30.
MolAnnemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31.
MolAnnemarie. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London, UK: Routledge.
32.
MolAnnemarieMoserIngunnPolsJeannette. 2010. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
33.
MoserIngunn. 2005. “On Becoming Disabled and Articulating Alternatives.” Cultural Studies19 (6): 667–700. doi: 10.1080/09502380500365648.
34.
MoserIngunn. 2017. “Sustaining the Webs of Life: An STS-approach to Space, Materiality and Subjectivity in Care.” In Caring Architecture. Institutions and Relational Practices, edited by NordCatharinaHögströmEbba, 83–92. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
