Drones deployed to monitor endangered species often crash. These crashes teach us that using drones for conservation is a contingent practice ensnaring humans, technologies, and animals. This article advances a crash theory in which pilots, conservation drones, and endangered megafauna are relata, or related actants, that intra-act, cocreating each other and a mutually constituted phenomena. These phenomena are entangled, with either reciprocal dependencies or erosive entrapments. The crashing of conservation drones and endangered species requires an ethics of care, repair, or reworlding. Diffractions, disruptions that expose difference, result from crashes and reveal the precarious manner by which technologies, laws, and discourses bring nature and culture together. To support crash theory, this article presents three ethnographic cases. A drone crash in the United Kingdom near white rhinoceroses while building machine learning training data exhibits the involvement of the electromagnetic spectrum; the threat of crashes in the Pacific Northwest near Puget Sound orcas discloses the impacts of drone laws; and drone crashes in Sri Lanka among Asian elephants presents the problems of technoliberal ideals around programming natural worlds. Throughout the article, a methodology is developed, parallelism, which attends to the material similarities in lateral phenomena.
BraidottiR.2018. “A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities.” Theory, Culture, and Society36 (6): 1–31.
7.
British Broadcasting Company. 2018. “World Elephant Day: Should We Be Worried about the Number of Elephants?” British Broadcasting Company, August 12. Accessed April 8, 2020. https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/45032922.
DuffyR.MasseF.SmidtE.MarijnenE.BuscherB.VerweijenJ.RamutsindelaM.SimlaiT.JoannyL.LunstrumE.. 2019. “Why We Must Question the Militarisation of Conservation.” Biological Conservation232: 66–73.
14.
FishA.2017. Technoliberalism and the End of Participatory Culture in the United States. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
FishA.2018. “Points of Presence.” Screenworks8 (2): 1.
FishA.GarrettB.CaseO.. 2017a. “Drones Caught in the Net.” Imaginations: Journal of Cross-Cultural Images Studies8 (2): 74–79.
18.
FishA.GarrettB.CaseO.. 2017b. “Extended Flight: The Emergence of Drone Sovereignty.” InVisible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Culture27: 1–8.
19.
GabrysJ.2016. Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
GandyM.2017. “Urban Atmospheres.” Cultural Geographies24 (3): 353–74.
21.
GeertzC.1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
22.
GonzalezL.MontesG. A.PuigE.JohnsonS.MengersenK.GastonK. J.. 2016. “Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation.” Sensors16 (1): 97.
HahnN.MwakatobeA.KonucheJ.De SouzaN.KeyyuJ.GossM., et al.2016. “Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Mitigate Human-Elephant Conflict on the Borders of Tanzanian Parks: A Case Study.” Oryx51: 513–16.
25.
HarawayD.1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
26.
HarawayD.1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. New York: Routledge.
27.
HarawayD.2003. The Companion Species Manifesto. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
28.
HarawayD.2018. “Staying with the Trouble for Multispecies Environmental Justice.” Dialogues in Human Geography8 (1): 102–5.
HodderI.2018. The Evolution of Humans and Things. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
HodderI.MolA.. 2016. “Network Analysis and Entanglement.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory23 (1): 1–29.
32.
JacksonS.2014. “Rethinking Repair.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality and Society, edited by GillespieT.BoczkowskiP.FootK., 221–40. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
KaiserB. M.2014. “Worlding CompLit: Diffractive Reading with Barad, Glissant, and Nancy.” Parallax20 (3): 274–87.
34.
KaridozoM.OsbornF. V.. 2015. “Community Based Conflict Mitigation Trials: Results of Field Tests of Chili as an Elephant Deterrent.” Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species3 (144): 1–6.
35.
KingL. E.LalaF.NzumuH.MwambinguE.Douglas-HamiltonI.. 2017. “Beehive Fences as a Multidimensional Conflict-mitigation Tool for Farmers Coexisting with Elephants.” Conservation Biology31 (4): 743–52.
KiokoJ.MuruthiP.OmondiP.ChyiyoP. I.. 2008. “The Performance of Electric Fences as Elephant Barriers in Amboseli, Kenya.” South African Journal of Wildlife Research38 (1): 52–58.
38.
LatimerJ.2013. “Being Alongside: Rethinking Relations amongst Different Kinds.” Theory, Culture, and Society30 (7-8): 77–104.
39.
LatourB.2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. London, UK: Polity Press.
40.
LawJ.2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London, UK: Routledge.
41.
LovelockJ.2019. Novacene. London, UK: Allen Lane.
42.
LukeT.1995. “On Environmentality: Geo-Power and Eco-Knowledge in the Discourses of Contemporary Environmentalism.” Cultural Critique31: 57–81.
43.
LunstrumE.2014. “Green Militarization: Anti-poaching Efforts and the Spatial Contours of Kruger National Park.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers104 (4): 816–32.
44.
MackenzieA.MusterA.. 2019. “Platform Seeing: Image Ensembles and Their Invisualities.” Theory, Culture, and Society36 (5): 3–22.
45.
NagelkerkenI.ConnellS. D.. 2015. “Global Alteration of Ocean Ecosystem Functioning due to Increasing Human CO2 Emissions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America112 (43): 13272–77.
46.
ParksL.2017. “Vertical Mediation and the U.S. Drone War in the Horn of Africa.” In Life in the Age of Drone Warfare, edited by ParksL.KaplanC., 134–58. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
47.
ParksL.2019. “Mediating Animal-infrastructure Relations.” In Being Material, edited by HelmreichS.BoucherM.UchillR., 141–53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
PedeltyM.1995. War Stories: The Culture of Foreign Correspondents. New York: Routledge.
49.
PerrowC.1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.
50.
RavertyS. A.RhodesL. D.ZabekE.EshghiA.CameronC. E.HansonM. B.SchroederJ. P.. 2017. “Respiratory Microbiome of Endangered Southern Resident Killer Whales and Microbiota of Surrounding Sea Surface Microlayer in the Eastern North Pacific.” Scientific Reports7: 1–12.
51.
RedrobeK.2010. Crash: Cinema and Politics of Speed and Stasis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
SchiffmanR.2014. “Drones Flying High as New Tool for Field Biologists.” Science344 (6183): 459.
55.
ShafferL.KhadkaJ. K. K.Van Den HoekJ.NaithaniK. J.. 2019. “Human-elephant Conflict: A Review of Current Management Strategies and Future Directions.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution11: 1–12.
StarS. L.1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist43 (3): 377–91.
60.
SteiglerB.2018. The Neganthropocene. London, UK: Open Humanities Press.
61.
StrathernM.1980. “No Nature, No Culture: The Hagen Case.” In Nature, Culture, and Gender, edited by MacCormackC.StrathernM., 174–222. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
TsingA. L.2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
