Do immigrant faculty trained in American higher education institutions adopt the outlook and practices of native US scientists and engineers (“convergence”), or do they diverge from such practices? The modern science paradigm holds that location will not matter significantly and that immigrants in either place will converge to a common standard of scientific practice. Drawing upon 134 in-depth interviews, this paper compares the scientific practices of two groups of Indian immigrant faculty in science and engineering: (i) those who studied and worked in the United States and then returned to India and (ii) those who continued to work in the United States. This paper shows that the two groups differed in important ways: ease of securing grants, management of grants, research environment, professional autonomy, and research type.
AronowitzS.2000. The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
2.
BhattacharyaS.KaulA.. 2015. “Emerging Countries Assertion in the Global Publication Landscape of Science: A Case Study of India.” Scientometrics103 (2): 387–411.
3.
BlochC.SorensenM. P.. 2015. “The Size of Research Funding: Trends and Implications.” Science & Public Policy42 (1): 30–42.
4.
BrintS.2005. “Creating the Future: New Directions in American Research Universities.” Minerva43 (1): 23–50.
5.
BushV.1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: Government Printing Press.
6.
BybeeR.2011. “Scientific and Engineering Practices in K–12 Classrooms.” The Science Teacher78 (9): 34–40.
EtzkowitzH.1983. “Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic Science.” Minerva21 (2): 198–233.
10.
GibbonsM.LimogesC.NowotnyH.SchwartzmanS.ScottP.TrowM.. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London, UK: Sage.
11.
GoldfarbB.2008. “The Effect of Government Contracting on Academic Research: Does the Source of Funding Affect Scientific Output?” Research Policy37 (1): 41–58.
12.
HevnerA. R.2007. “A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems19 (2): 87–92.
13.
HowardD. J.LairdF. N.. 2013. “The New Normal in Funding University Science.” Issues in Science and Technology30 (1): n.p.
14.
KaiserD.2011. “The Search for Clean Cash.” Nature472 (7341): 30–31.
15.
KingD. A.2004. “The Scientific Impact of Nations.” Nature430 (6997): 311–16.
16.
KuhnT. S.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
LatourB.WoolgarS.. 2013. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
LeslieS. W.1993. The Cold War and American Science: The Military–Industrial–Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
LongJ. S.FoxM. F.. 1995. “Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism.” Annual Review of Sociology21 (1): 45–71.
20.
LonginoH. E.2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
National Science Board. 2016. Science and Engineering Indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
22.
NobleD. F.1984. Forces of Production. New York: Alfred Knopf.
23.
SabharwalM.VarmaR.. 2016. “Return Migration to India: Decision-making among Academic Scientists and Engineers.” International Migration54 (4): 177–90.
SiegelD. S.WaldmanD. A.AtwaterL. E.LinkA. N.. 2004. “Toward a Model of the Effective Transfer of Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technologies.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management21 (1): 115–42.
26.
SlaughterS.CampbellT.HollemanM.MorganE.. 2002. “The ‘Traffic’ in Graduate Students: Graduate Students as Tokens of Exchange between Academe and Industry.” Science, Technology, & Human Values27 (2): 282–312.
27.
SlaughterS.RhoadesG.. 1996. “The Emergence of a Competitiveness Research and Development Policy Coalition and the Commercialization of Academic Science and Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values21 (3): 303–39.
28.
TraweekS.1992. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
TurnbullD.1997. “Reframing Science and other Local Knowledge Traditions.” Futures29 (6): 551–62.
30.
VarmaR.2000. “Changing Research Cultures in U.S. Industry.” Science, Technology, & Human Values25 (4): 395–416.
31.
VarmaR.2002. “Are We Eating our Seed Corn?: Basic Research in the US Corporate Sector.” Prometheus20 (1): 1–14.
32.
WelshR.GlennaL.LacyW.BiscottiD.. 2008. “Close Enough but Not Too Far: Assessing the Effects of University–Industry Research Relationships and the Rise of Academic Capitalism.” Research Policy37 (10): 1854–64.
