BalmerBrian. 2013. Secrecy and Science: A Historical Sociology of Biological and Chemical Warfare. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
2.
BorgmanChristine L.2012. “The Conundrum of Sharing Research Data.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63 (6): 1059–78.
3.
BrownMark B.2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
EvansJames A.2010. “Industry Collaboration, Scientific Sharing, and the Dissemination of Knowledge.” Social Studies of Science40 (5):757–91.
5.
FaraceD. J.SchöpfelJoachim, eds. 2010. Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies. New York: De Gruyter Saur.
6.
HackettEdward J.2005. “Essential Tensions: Identity, Control, and Risk in Research.” Social Studies of Science35 (5): 787–826.
7.
HilgartnerStephen. 2000. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
LawrenceAmandaHoughtonJohnThomasJulianWeldonPaul. 2014. “Where Is the Evidence: Realising the Value of Grey Literature for Public Policy and Practice.” Swinburne Institute. doi:10.4225/50/5580b1e02daf9.
9.
LeonelliSabina. 2016. Data-centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
PeledAlon. 2011. “When Transparency and Collaboration Collide: The USA Open Data Program.” Journal of the American Society for Information62 (11): 2085–94.
11.
RappertBrianBalmerBrian, eds. 2015. Absence in Science, Security and Policy. London, UK: Palgrave.
12.
RobertsAlasdair. 2006. Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
SchöpfelJoachimFaraceD. J.. 2010. “Grey Literature.” In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3rd ed., edited by BatesMarcia J.MaackMary Niles, 2029–39. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
