The popularity of Thomas Piketty’s research on wealth inequality has drawn attention to a curious question: why was widening wealth inequality largely neglected by mainstream economists in recent decades? To explore and explain that neglect, I draw on the writing of the early neoclassical economist John Bates Clark, who introduced the notion of the marginal productivity of income distribution at the end of the nineteenth century. I then turn to Piketty’s Capital in order to analyze the salience of marginal productivity theories of income today. I suggest that most of the criticism and praise for Piketty’s research is focused on data that are accessible and measurable, obscuring attention to questions over whether current methods for measuring economic capital are defensible or not. My overarching aim is to explore how “absent” data in economics as a whole help to reinforce blind spots within mainstream economic theory.
ArmitageJ.2014. “FT Analysis of My Book is “Ridiculous”, Says Thomas Piketty.” Independent, May 27.
2.
ArnspergerC.VaroufakisY.. 2005. “A Most Peculiar Failure: How Neoclassical Economics Turns Theoretical Failure into Academic and Political Power.” Erkenntnis59: 157–88.
3.
BourdieuP.1966. “Champ intellectuel et projet créateur.” Les Temps Modernes246: 865–906.
4.
ClarkJ. B. [1899] 2012. The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. Memphis, TN: General Books.
5.
CochraneD. T.2011. “Castioradis, Veblen and the ‘Power Theory of Capital.’” In Depoliticization: The Imaginary of Global Capitalism, edited by StraumeI. S.HumphreysJ. F., 89–123. Copenhagen, UK: Aarhus University Press.
6.
Domhoff. 1979. The Powers that Be. New York: Random House.
7.
FioritoLuca. (2013). “When Economics Faces the Economy: John Bates Clark and the 1914 Antitrust Legislation.” Review of Political Economy25 (1): 139–63.
8.
GalbraithJ.2014. “Kapital for the Twenty-First Century?” Dissent (Spring 2014).
9.
GeorgeH. [1880] 2012. Progress and Poverty. Memphis, TN: General Books.
10.
GilesC.2014. “Data Problems with Capital in the 21st Century.” Financial Times, May 23.
11.
GrossM.McGoeyL.. 2015. ‘Introduction’ Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. London, UK: Routledge.
12.
HarringtonB.2016. Capital without Borders: Wealth Managers and the One Percent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
HudsonM.2014. “Piketty vs. the Classical Economic Reformers.” Real-world Economic Review69:122–30.
14.
KeisterL.2005. Getting Rich: America’s New Rich and How They Got that Way. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15.
KeisterL.MollerS.. 2000. “Wealth Inequality in the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology26:63–81.
16.
KhanM. 2000. “Rents, Efficiency and Growth.” In Rents, Rent-Seeking and Economic Development, edited by KhanM.JomoK.Cambridge University Press.
17.
LaneJ.2000. Pierre Bourdieu: A Critical Introduction. London, UK: Pluto.
18.
LeonardT.2003. “‘A Certain Rude Honesty’: John Bates Clark as a Pioneering Neoclassical Economist.” History of Political Economy35 (3): 521–58.
19.
MankiwG.2013a. “In Defense of the One Percent.” Journal of Economic Perspectives27 (3): 21–34.
20.
MankiwG.2013b. Macroeconomics, 8th ed. New York: Worth Publishers.
21.
MankiwG.2016. Macroeconomics, 9th ed. New York: Worth Publishers.
McGoeyL.2009. “Pharmaceutical Controversies and the Performative Value of Uncertainty.” Science as Culture18 (2): 151–64.
24.
McGoeyL.2015. No Such Thing as a Free Gift: The Gates Foundation and the Price of Philanthropy. London, UK: Verso.
25.
MilonakisD.FineB.. 2008. From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory. New York: Routledge.
26.
MiyazakiH.2006. “Economy of Dreams: Hope in Global Capitalism and Its Critiques.” Cultural Anthropology22 (2): 147–72.
27.
MorganM.1993. “Competing Notions of “Competition” in Late Nineteenth-century American Economics.” History of Political Economy25 (4): 563–604.
MurphyM.2006. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
PerskyJ.2000. “The Neoclassical Advent: American Economics at the Dawn of the 20th-century.” Journal of Economic Perspectives14 (1): 95–108.
31.
PikettyT.2014. Capital in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
RobinsonJ.1953-1954. “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital.” Review of Economic Studies21 (2): 81–106.
33.
SamuelsonP.1966. “Economic Theory and Wages.” In The Collected Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, edited by StiglitzJ.. MIT Press.
34.
SavageM.WilliamsK.. 2008. “Elites: Remembered in Capitalism and Forgotten in Social Science.” The Sociological Review56 (s1): 1–24.
35.
SayerA.2012. “Facing the Challenge of the Return of the Rich.” In Class Inequality in Austerity Britain, Houndmills, edited by AtkinsonW.RobertsS.SavageM., 163–79. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, Macmillan.
36.
SayerA.2014. Why We Can’t Afford the Rich. Bristol, UK: Polity.
