Old age is not normally associated with innovativeness and technical prowess. To the contrary, when treating age as a distinct category, policy makers, innovation scholars, and companies typically regard younger people as drivers of innovation, and the early adoption of new technology. In this paper, we critically investigate this link between age, ineptness, and technology adoption using a case study of the diffusion of electric bikes in the Netherlands. We demonstrate how, during the first wave of e-bike acceptance, old age was constructed as an arena in which important learning processes took place, and where older persons became early adopters of e-bikes. Theoretically, this paper speaks critically to the prolific literature on innovation diffusion and its treatment of adopter categories as generic concepts. Using age as a central dimension, our research highlights the situated and constructed nature of adopter categories, and thus challenges age-based assumptions about innovation and technology use by younger and older persons. These insights about what we term the rejuvenation of e-bikes help us rectify existing biases of older persons as an inherently problematic group of technology users.
AkrichMadeleine. 1992. “The De-scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/ Building Society-Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by BijkerWiebe E.LawJohn, 205–24. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2.
AkrichMadeleine. 1995. “User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology.” In Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, edited by RipArieMisaThomas J.SchotJohan, 167–84. London, UK: Pinter Publishers.
3.
ArtsJoep W. C.FrambachRuud T.BijmoltTammo H. A.. 2011. “Generalizations on Consumer Innovation Adoption: A Meta-analysis on Drivers of Intention and Behavior.” International Journal of Research in Marketing28 (2): 134–44.
4.
BaltesPaul B.SmithJacqui. 2003. “New Frontiers in the Future of Aging: From Successful Aging of the Young Old to the Dilemmas of the Fourth Age.” Gerontology49 (2): 123–35.
5.
BaudrillardJean. 1998. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London, UK: Sage Publications.
6.
BlumerHerbert. 1954. “What Is Wrong with Social Theory?” American Sociological Review19 (1): 3–10.
7.
BurrellJenna. 2011. “User Agency in the Middle Range: Rumors and the Reinvention of the Internet in Accra, Ghana.” Science, Technology, & Human Values36 (2): 139–59.
8.
BythewayBill. 1995. Ageism. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
9.
CallonMichel. 2008. “Economic Markets and the Rise of Interactive Agencements: From Prosthetic Agencies to Habilitated Agencies.” In Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies, edited by PinchTrevorSwedbergRichard, 29–56. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.
CarolanMichael S.2008. “Democratizing Knowledge: Sustainable and Conventional Agricultural Field Days as Divergent Democratic Forms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values33 (4): 508–28.
11.
CarrDawn C.KompKathrin S., eds. 2011. Gerontology in the Era of the Third Age: Implications and Next Steps. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
12.
ChapmanSherry Ann. 2005. “Theorizing about Aging Well: Constructing a Narrative.” Canadian Journal on Aging24 (1): 9–11.
13.
ChapmanSherry Ann. 2006. “A ‘New Materialist’ Lens on Aging Well: Special Things in Later Life.” Journal of Aging Studies20 (3): 207–16.
14.
CharmazK.2003. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 2nd ed., edited by DenzinNormanLincolnYvonna S., 249–91. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
EbertAnne-Katrin. 2010. Radelnde Nationen – Die Geschichte des Fahrrads in Deutschland und den Niederlanden bis 1940. Frankfurt a.M, Germany: Campus Verlag.
16.
EssénAnnaÖstlundBritt. 2011. “Laggards as Innovators? Old Users as Designers of New Services & Service Systems.” International Journal of Design5 (3): 89–98.
17.
FagerbergJanVerspagenBart. 2009. “Innovation Studies—The Emerging Structure of a New Scientific Field.” Research Policy38 (2): 218–33.
18.
FeatherstoneMikeHepworthMike. 2005. “Images of Ageing: Cultural Representations of Later Life.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing, edited by JohnsonMalcom L.BengtsonVern L.ColemanPeter G.KirkwoodThomas B. L., 354–62. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19.
FiskArthur D.RogersWendy A.CharnessNeilCzajaSara J.SharitJoseph. 2009. Designing for Older Adults-Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
20.
FlickUwe. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
GatignonHubertRobertsonThomas S.. 1985. “A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research.” Journal of Consumer Research11 (4): 849–67.
22.
GilleardChrisHiggsPaul. 2002. “The Third Age: Class, Cohort or Generation?” Ageing & Society22 (3): 369–82.
23.
GilleardChrisHiggsPaul. 2013. “The Fourth Age and the Concept of a ‘Social Imaginary’: A Theoretical Excursus.” Journal of Aging Studies27 (4): 368–76.
24.
GilleardChrisHiggsPaulHydeMartinWigginsRichardBlaneDavid. 2005. “Class, Cohort, and Consumption: The British Experience of the Third Age.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences60 (6): S305–10.
25.
GioiaDennis A.CorleyKevin G.HamiltonAimee L.. 2013. “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology.” Organizational Research Methods16 (1): 15–31.
26.
GreenhalghTrishaRobertGlennMacfarlaneFraserBatePaulKyriakidouOlympiaPeacockRichard. 2005. “Storylines of Research in Diffusion of Innovation: A Meta-narrative Approach to Systematic Review.” Social Science & Medicine61 (2): 417–30.
27.
HauserJohnTellisGerard J.GriffinAbbie. 2006. “Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for “Marketing Science”.” Marketing Science25 (6): 687–717.
28.
HiggsPaulHydeM.GilleardChrisVictorC. R.WigginsR. D.JonesI. R.. 2009. “From Passive to Active Consumers? Later Life Consumption in the UK from 1968-2005.” Sociological Review57 (1): 102–24.
29.
HolsteinMartha B.MinklerMeredith. 2003. “Self, Society, and the “New Gerontology”.” The Gerontologist43 (6): 787–96.
30.
HowaldtJürgenKoppRalfSchwarzMichael. 2015. On the Theory of Social Innovation-Tarde’s Neglected Contribution to the Development of a Social Innovation Theory. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Juventa.
31.
IsabellaLynn A.1990. “Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events.” Academy of Management Journal33 (1): 7–41.
32.
JonesIan ReesHydeMartinVictorChristina R.WigginsRichard D.GilleardChrisHiggsPaul. 2008. Ageing in a Consumer Society: From Passive to Active Consumption in Britain. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
33.
JoyceKellyMamoLaura. 2006. “Graying the Cyborg; New Directions in Feminist Analyses of Aging, Science, and Technology.” In Age Matters; Realigning Feminist Thinking, edited by CalasantiToniSlevinKathleen, 99–121. London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.
KarnowskiVeronikavon PapeThiloWirthWerner. 2011. “Overcoming the Binary Logic of Adoption.” In The Diffusion of Innovations: A Communication Science Perspective, edited by VishwanathA.BarnettG., 57–75. New York: Peter Lang.
36.
KatzElihu. 1999. “Theorizing Diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science566 (3): 144–55.
37.
KatzElihu. 2006. “Rediscovering Gabriel Tarde.” Political Communication23 (3): 263–70.
38.
KatzStephenRudmanDebbie Laliberte. 2004. “Exemplars of Retirement: Identity and Agency between Lifestyle and Social Movement.” In Old Age and Agency, edited by TulleEmmanuelle, 45–65. New York: Nova Science.
39.
KatzStephenMarshallBarbara. 2003. “New Sex for Old: Lifestyle, Consumerism, and the Ethics of Aging Well.” Journal of Aging Studies17 (2003): 3–16.
40.
KinnunenJussi. 1996. “Gabriel Tarde as a Founding Father of Innovation Diffusion Research.” Acta Sociologica39 (4): 431–42.
41.
KohlbacherFlorianHangChang Chieh. 2011. “Applying the Disruptive Innovation Framework to the Silver Market.” Ageing International36 (1): 82–101.
42.
LaslettPeter. 1991. A Fresh Map of Life: The Emergence of the Third Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
LassenAske JuulMoreiraTiago. 2014. “Unmaking Old Age: Political and Cognitive Formats of Active Ageing.” Journal of Aging Studies30 (1): 33–46.
44.
LatourBruno. 1991. “Technology is Society Made Durable.” In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by LawJohn, 103–31. London, UK: Routledge.
45.
LatourBruno. 2002. “Gabriel Tarde and the End of the Social.” In The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences, edited by JoycePatrick, 117–32. London, UK: Routledge.
46.
LatourBruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
MannWilliam C.2003. “Assistive Technology.” In Impact of Technology on Successful Aging, edited by CharnessNeilWarner SchaieK., 177–202. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
48.
MartinsonMartyBerridgeClara. 2015. “Successful Aging and Its Discontents: A Systematic Review of the Social Gerontology Literature.” The Gerontologist55 (1): 58–69.
49.
McCreadieClaudineTinkerAnthea. 2005. “The Acceptability of Assistive Technology to Older People.” Ageing & Society25 (1): 91–110.
50.
MeyerGaryk. 2004. “Diffusion Methodology: Time to Innovate?” Journal of Health Communication9 (1): 59–69.
51.
MoenPhyllisSpencerDonna. 2006. “Converging Divergences in Age, Gender, Health, and Well-being—Strategic Selection in the Third Age.” In Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, edited by BinstockRobert H.GeorgeLinda K., 127–44. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
52.
NelsonTodd D.2004. Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
53.
NevenLouis. 2010. “‘But Obviously Not for Me’: Robots, Laboratories and the Defiant Identity of Elder Test User.” Sociology of Health and Illness32(2):335–47.
54.
NevenLouis. 2011. Representations of the Old and Ageing in the Design of the New and Emerging: Assessing the Design of Ambient Intelligence Technologies for Older People. Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente.
55.
NevenLouis. 2015. “By Any Means? Questioning the Link between Gerontechnological Innovation and Older People’s Wish to Live at Home.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change93:32–43.
56.
OudshoornNelly. 2011. Telecare Technologies and the Transformation of Healthcare. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
OudshoornNellyPinchTrevor. 2003. “Introduction: How Users and Non-users Matter.” In How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies, edited by OudshoornNellyPinchTrevor, 1–25. New Baskerville: The MIT Press.
58.
PeineAlexanderFaulknerAlexJægerBirgitMoorsEllen. 2015. “Science, Technology and the ‘Grand Challenge’ of Ageing—Understanding the Socio-material Constitution of Later Life.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change93 (1): 1–9.
59.
PeineAlexanderHerrmannAndrea M.. 2012. “The Sources of Use Knowledge: Towards Integrating the Dynamics of Technology Use and Design in the Articulation of Societal Challenges.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change79 (8): 1495–512.
60.
PeineAlexanderNevenLouis. 2011. “Social-structural Lag Revisited.” Gerontechnology10 (3): 129–39.
61.
PeineAlexanderRollwagenIngoNevenLouis. 2014. “The Rise of the “Innosumer”—Rethinking Older Technology Users.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change82 (1): 199–214.
62.
PucherJohnBuehlerRalph. 2008. “Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany.” Transport Reviews28 (4): 495–528.
63.
RiceRonald E.RogersEverett M.. 1980. “Reinvention in the Innovation Process.” Science Communication1 (4): 499–514.
64.
RobertsCeliaMortMaggie. 2009. “Reshaping What Counts as Care: Older People, Work and New Technologies.” ALTER—European Journal of Disability Research3 (2): 138–58.
65.
RogersEverett. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
66.
RogersEverett. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York: The Free Press.
67.
RogersEverett. 2004. “A Prospective and Retrospective Look at the Diffusion Model.” Journal of Health Communication9 (1): 13–19.
68.
RyanBryceGrossNeal C.. 1943. “The Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn in Two Iowa Communities.” Rural Sociology8 (1): 15–24.
69.
RyanBryceGrossNeal C.. 1950. “Acceptance and Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn in Two Iowa Communities.” Iowa Agricultural Station Research Bulletin372:663–708.
70.
StoffersManuel. 2012. “Cycling as Heritage: Representing the History of Cycling in the Netherlands.” The Journal of Transport History33 (1): 92–114.
71.
StraussAnselmCorbinJulie. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research-Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
72.
SuopajärviTiina. 2015. “Past Experiences, Current Practices and Future Design.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change93 (1): 112–23.
73.
SzmiginIsabelleCarriganMarylyn. 2000. “The Older Consumer as Innovator: Does Cognitive Age Hold the Key?” Journal of Marketing Management16 (5): 505–27.
74.
TardeGabriel. 1903. The Laws of Imitation. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
75.
VeblenThorstein. 1925. The Theory of the Leisure Class-An Economic Study of Institutions. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin.
76.
WalkerAlan. 2008. “Commentary: The Emergence and Application of Active Aging in Europe.” Journal of Aging & Social Policy21 (1): 75–93.
77.
WyattSally. 2003. “Non-users also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-users of the Internet.” In How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies, edited by OudshoornNellyPinchTrevor, 67–80. New Baskerville: The MIT Press.
