Given the growing centrality of interdisciplinarity to scientific research, gaining a better understanding of successful interdisciplinary collaborations has become imperative. Drawing on extensive case studies of nine research networks in the social, natural, and computational sciences, we propose a construct that captures the multidimensional character of such collaborations, that of a shared cognitive–emotional–interactional (SCEI) platform. We demonstrate its value as an integrative lens to examine markers of and conditions for successful interdisciplinary collaborations as defined by researchers involved in these groups. We show that (1) markers and conditions embody three different dimensions: cognitive, emotional, and interactional; (2) these dimensions are present in all networks, albeit to different degrees; (3) the dimensions are intertwined and mutually constitutive; and (4) they operate in conjunction with institutional conditions created by funders. We compare the SCEI platforms to available frameworks for successful interdisciplinary work.
AhmedSara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotions. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
2.
AhmedSara. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
BalesRobert F.CohenStephen P.. 1979. SYMLOG: A System for the Multiple Level Observation of Groups. New York: Free Press.
4.
BammerGabriele. 2013. Disciplining Interdisciplinarity: Integration and Implementation Sciences for Researching Complex Real-world Problems. Canberra, Australia: ANU E-Press.
5.
BergmannMathiasJahnT.KnoblochT.KrohnW.PohlC.SchrammE.. 2012. Methods for Transdisciplinary Research. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
6.
Boix MansillaVeronica. 2002. “Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier: An Empirical Examination of Expert Interdisciplinary Epistemologies.” Issues in Integrative Studies24:1–31.
7.
Boix MansillaVeronica. 2006. “Assessing Expert Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier: An Empirical Exploration.” Research Evaluation15 (1): 17–29.
8.
Boix MansillaVeronica. 2010. “Learning to Synthesize: An Epistemological Foundation for Interdisciplinary Learning.” In Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by FrodemanR.KleinJ. T.MitchamC., 288–91. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Boix MansillaVeronicaFellerIrwinGardnerHoward. 2006. “Quality Assessment in Interdisciplinary Research and Education.” Research Evaluation15 (1): 69–74.
10.
Boix MansillaVeronicaLamontMichèleSatoKyoko. 2010. “Successful Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Toward a Socio-emotional-cognitive Platform for Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Report Submitted to the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, June 2010.
11.
BrintSteven G.Turk-BicakciLoriProctorKirstopherMurphyScott Patrick. 2009. “Expanding the Social Frame of Knowledge: Interdisciplinary, Degree-granting Fields in American Colleges and Universities, 1975-2000.” Review of Higher Education32 (2): 155–83.
12.
BrommeRainer. 2000. “Beyond One’s Own Perspective: The Psychology of Cognitive Interdisciplinarity.” In Practicing Interdisciplinarity, edited by StehrN.WeingartP., 115–33. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.
13.
BruceAnnLyallCatherineTaitJoyceWilliamsRobin. 2004. “Interdisciplinary Integration in Europe: The Case of the Fifth Framework Programme.” Futures36 (4): 457–70.
14.
BruunHenrikHukkinenJanneHuutoniemiKatriKleinJulie Thompson. 2005. Promoting Interdisciplinary Research: The Case of the Academy of Finland. Publications of the Academy of Finland, 8/05. Helsinki: Publications of the Academy of Finland.
15.
CamicCharlesGrossNeilLamontMichèle. 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
ClarkHerbert H.1992. Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
CollinsHarryEvansRobert. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
CollinsHarryEvansRobertGormanMichael E.. 2010. “Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise.” In Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration, edited by GormanMichael E., 7–24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
CorbinJulietStraussAnselm. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
CsikszentmihalyiMihaly. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
21.
DerrySharon J.SchunnChristian D.GernsbacherMorton Ann. 2005. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
ElginCatherine Z.1999. “The Heart Has Its Reasons.” In Considered Judgment, edited by ElginC. Z., 146–69. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
FellerIrwin. 2002. “Performance Measurement Redux.” American Journal of Evaluation23 (4): 435–52.
25.
FellerIrwin. 2006. “Multiple Actors, Multiple Settings, Multiple Criteria: Issues in Assessing Interdisciplinary Research.” Research Evaluation15 (1): 5–15.
26.
FrickelScottGrossNeil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movement.” American Sociological Review70 (2): 204–32.
27.
FrodemanRobert. 2010. “Introduction.” In Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by FrodemanR.KleinJ. T.MichamC., xxix-1. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
FullerSteve. 2010. “Deviant Interdisciplinarity.” In Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by FrodemanR.KleinJ. T.MichamC., 50–64. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
FuntowitzSilvio O.RavetzJerome R.. 1993. “The Emergence of Post-normal Science.” In Science, Politics and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making, edited by SchombergR. V., 95–123. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30.
GalisonPeter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
GalisonPeter. 2010. “Trading with the enemy.” In Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration, edited by GormanE., 7–24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
GibbonsMichaelLimogesCamilleNowotnyHelgaSchwartzmanSimonScottPeterTrowMartin. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London, UK: Sage.
33.
GlaserBarneyStraussAnselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
34.
GoodwinJeffJasperJames M.PollettaFrancesca. 2001. Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
GreggMelissaSeigworthGregory J.. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
GriffinGabrieleBränström-ÖhmanAnnelieKalmanHildur, eds. 2013. The Emotional Politics of Research Collaboration. Vol. 7. New York: Routledge.
37.
GustonDavid H.2001. “Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction.” Science, Technology & Human Values26 (4): 399–408.
38.
HackettEdward J.RhotenDiana R.. 2009. “The Snowbird Charrette: Integrative Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Environmental Research Design.” Minerva47 (4): 407–40.
39.
HannanMichael T.2010. “Partiality of Memberships in Categories.” Annual Review of Sociology36 (1): 159–81.
40.
HardingJenniferDeidre PribramE., eds. 2009. Emotions: A Cultural Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
41.
HargadonAndrew B.2002. “Brokering Knowledge: Linking Learning and Innovation.” Research in Organizational Behavior24:41–85.
42.
HirschauerStefan. 2009. “Editorial Judgments. A Praxeology of ‘Voting’ in Peer Review.” Social Studies of Science40 (1): 71–103.
43.
HochschildArlie Russel. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology85 (3): 551–75.
44.
HolbrookJ. Britt. 2013. “What Is Interdisciplinary Communication? Reflections on the Very Idea of Disciplinary Integration.” Synthese190 (11): 1865–79.
45.
HollandDominic. 2014. Integrating Knowledge through Interdisciplinary Research: Problems of Theory and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
46.
HollingsworthR.HollingsworthE. J.. 2000. “Major Discoveries and Biomedical Research Organizations: Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity, Nurturing Leadership, and Integrated Structure and Cultures.” In Practicing Interdisciplinarity, edited by WeingartP.StehrN., 215–44. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.
47.
HuutoniemiKatriBruunHenrikHukkinenJanneKleinJulie Thompson. 2008. “Grafting Knowledge: An Elementary Art of Science.” Unpublished manuscript, Finland Futures Research Centre, University of Turku, Finland.
48.
IllouzEva. 2007. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
49.
Immordino-YangMary HelenFischerKurt W.. 2009. “Neuroscience Bases of Learning.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd ed., edited by AukrustV. G., 310–16. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
50.
JacobsJerry A.2014. In Defense of Disciplines: Interdisciplinartiy and Specialization in the Research University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
JacobsJerry A.FrickelScott. 2009. “Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology35 (1): 43–65.
52.
JanisIrving L. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
KelloggKatherine C.OrlikowskiWanda J.YatesJoAnne. 2006. “Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations.” Organization Science17 (1): 22–44.
55.
KleinJulie T.1996. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
56.
KleinJulie T.2013. “Communication and Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research.” In Enhancing Communication & Collaboration in Cross-disciplinary Research, edited by O’RourkeM.CrowleyS.EigenbrodeS. D.WulfhorstJ. D., 11–30. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
KleinJulie Thompson. 2012. “The Discourse of Interdisciplinarity: Perspectives from the ‘Handbook of the Undergraduate Curriculum.’” Liberal Education98 (4): 4–11.
58.
Knorr-CetinaKarin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
KockelmansJoseph J.1979. “Why Interdisciplinarity?” In Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education, edited by KockelmansJ. J., 123–60. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
60.
KopmannSharonCainCindy L.LeaheyErin. 2015. “The Joy of Science: Disciplinary Diversity in Emotional Accounts.” Science, Technology, & Human Values40 (1): 30–70.
61.
KuhnThomas. [1962] 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
62.
LamontMichèle. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
LamontMichèle. 2010. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
LamontMichèle. 2012. “Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation.” Annual Review of Sociology38 (21): 201–21.
65.
LamontMichèleMallardGrégoireGuetzkowJoshua. 2006. “Beyond Blind Faith: Overcoming the Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Evaluation.” Research Evaluation15 (1): 43–55.
66.
LattucaLisa R.2001. Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching among College and University Faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
67.
LaudelGrit. 2006. “Conclave in the Tower of Babel: How Peers Review Interdisciplinary Research Proposals.” Research Evaluation15 (1): 57–68.
68.
LaveJeanWengerEtienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
69.
LeaheyErin. 2008. “Methodological Memes and Mores: Toward a Sociology of Social Research.” Annual Review of Sociology34:33–53.
70.
LeaheyErinMoodyJames2014. “Sociological Innovation through Subfield Integration.” Social Currents1 (3): 228–56.
71.
LiljeströmMariannePaasonenSusanna, eds. 2010. Working with Affect in Feminist Readings: Disturbing Differences. New York: Routledge.
72.
MertonRobert K.1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
MilesMatthew B.Michael HubermanA.. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
MillerMatthew L.2006. “Integrative Concepts and Interdisciplinary Work: A Study of Faculty Thinking in Four College and University Programs.” Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
75.
NSF (National Science Foundation). 2006. National Science Foundation Investing in America’s Future Strategic Plan FY 2006-2011. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
76.
National Academies. 2005. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
77.
NeumannAnna. 2006. “Professing Passion: Emotion in the Scholarship of Professors at Research Universities.” American Educational Research Journal43 (3): 381–416, 420-24.
78.
NikitinaSvetlana. 2005. “Pathways of Interdisciplinary Cognition.” Cognition and Instruction23 (3): 389–425.
79.
OECD/CERI (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development/Center for Educational Research and Innovation). 1972. Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).
O’RourkeMichaelCrowleyStephenEigenbrodeSanford D.WulfhorstJ. D., eds. 2014. Enhancing Communication & Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research. London, UK: Sage.
82.
O’RourkeM.CrowleyS.GonnermanC.. 2016. “On the Nature of Cross-disciplinary Integration: A Philosophical Framework. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.
83.
PachuckiMark A.PendergrassSabrinaLamontMichèle. 2007. “Boundary Processes: Recent Theoretical Developments and New Contributions.” Poetics35 (6): 331–51.
84.
PaletzSusannah B. F.SchunnChristian D.. 2010. “A Social-cognitive Framework of Multidisciplinary Team Innovation.” Topics in Cognitive Science2 (1): 73–95.
85.
ParkerJohn N.HackettEdward J.. 2012. “Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Scientific Collaborations and Social Movements.” American Sociological Review20 (1): 1–24.
86.
PooleM. S.HollingsheadAndrea B.. 2005. Theories of Small Groups Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London, UK: Sage.
87.
PowellWalter W.Owen-SmithJasonSmith-DoerrLaurel. 2011. “Sociology and the Science of Science Policy.” In The Science of Science Policy: A Handbook, edited by Husbands FealingK.LaneJ. I.MarburgerJ. H.IIIShippS. S., 31–55. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
88.
RepkoA. F.2012. Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
RiveraLauren A.2012. “Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms.” American Sociological Review77 (6): 999–1022.
91.
SchefflerIsrael. 1986. “In Praise of the Cognitive Emotions.” In Inquiries: Philosophical Studies of Language, Science, and Learning, edited by SchefflerI., 347–61. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
92.
SewellWilliam H., Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology98 (1): 1–29.
93.
ShapinSteven. 1995. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94.
StarSusan LeighGriesemerJames R.. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science19 (3): 387–420.
95.
StasserGaroldTitusWilliam. 1985. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48 (6): 1467–78.
96.
StokolsDanielHallKara L.TaylorBrandie K.MoserRichard P.. 2008. “The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine35 (2): 77–89.
97.
StokolsDanielMisraShaliniMoserRichard P.HallKara L.TaylorBrandie K.. 2008. “The Ecology of Team Science.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine35 (2): 96–115.
98.
ThagardPaulKroonFred. 2008. “Emotional Consensus in Group Decision Making.” In Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition, edited by ThagardP., 65–86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99.
van KnippenbergDaanDe DreuCarsten K. W.HomanAstrid C.. 2004. “Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda.” Journal of Applied Psychology89 (6): 1008–22.
100.
WagnerCaroline S.David RoessnerJ.BobbKamauKleinJulie ThompsonBoyackKevin W.KeytonJoannRafolsIsmaelBörnerKaty. 2011. “Approaches to Understanding and Measuring Interdisciplinary Scientific Research (IDR): A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Informetrics5 (1): 14–26.
101.
WeberMax. [1918] 1946. “Science as Vocation.” In Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by MillsC. W.GerthH., 129–57. New York: Oxford.
102.
WeingartPeter. 2010. “A Short History of Knowledge Formations.” In Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by FrodemanR.KleinJ. T.MitchamC., 3–14. New York: Oxford University Press.
103.
WuchtyStefanJonesBenjamin F.UzziBrian. 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.” Science316 (5827): 1036–39.
