Advertisements for high-technology products and services visualize processes and phenomena which are unvisualizable, such as globalization, networks, and information. We turn our attention specifically to the case of nanotechnology advertisements, using an approach that combines visual and sonic culture. Just as phenomena such as complexity and networks have become established in everyday discourse, nanotechnology seizes the social imaginary by establishing its own aesthetic conventions. Elaborating Raymond Williams’ concept of structures of feeling, we show that in visualizing nanotechnology, its stakeholders employ spaces, verbs, and objects of feeling. These favorable nanotechnology structures of feeling are woven into the social imaginary, recursively producing the reality they describe.
Ace Insurance ‘Nanotechnology’, Doremus Advertising, New York, 31999.
2.
AhmedSara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
3.
ArvidssonAdam. 2006. Brands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture. London, UK: Routledge.
4.
BairdDavisShewAshley. 2004. “Probing the History of Scanning Tunneling Microscopy.” In Discovering the Nanoscale, edited by BairdDavisNordmannAlfredSchummerJ.145–56. Amsterdam, UK: IOS Press.
BarthesRoland. 1957 (2000). Mythologies. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.
7.
BaudrillardJean. 1981 (1994). “The Precession of Simulacra.” In Simulacra and Simulation. Translated byGlaserShelia1–43. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Bensaude-VincentBernadetteNewmanWilliam R.. 2007. “Introduction: The Artificial and the Natural: State of the Problem.” In The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity, edited by Bensaude-VincentBernadetteNewmanWilliam R.1–19. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
BergerJohn. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London, UK: British Broadcasting.
11.
BlackDaniel. 2014. “An Aesthetics of the Invisible: Nanotechnology and Informatic Matter.” Theory Culture Society31 (1): 99–121.
BontemsVincent Karim. 2011. “How to Accommodate to the Invisible? The ‘Halo’ of ‘Nano’.” Nanoethics5 (2): 175–83.
14.
BorupMadsBrownNikKonradKorneliaVan LenteHarro. 2012. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management18 (3-4): 285–98.
15.
BrownNathan. 2007. “The Inorganic Open: Nanotechnology and Physical Being.” Radical Philosophy144 (July/Aug): 33–44.
16.
CampbellNorah. 2010. “Future Sex: Cyborg Bodies and the Politics of Meaning.” Advertising and Society Review11 (1): 50–101.
17.
CampbellNorah. 2012. “Regarding Derrida: The Tasks of Visual Deconstruction.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management7 (1): 23–47.
18.
CampbellNorahSarenMichael. 2010. “The Primitive, Technology and Horror: A Posthuman Biology.” Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization10 (2): 152–76.
19.
CarlsonJeff. 2007. Plague Year. New York: Ace Publishing.
20.
CreedBarbara. 1998. “Alien and the Monstrous Feminine.” In Alien Zone: Cultural Theory and Contemporary Science Fiction Cinema, edited by KuhnAnnette128–45. London, New York: Verso.
21.
CreedBarbara. 1998. The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
European Commission. 2005. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee: Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An action Plan for Europe 2005-2009. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Fantastic Voyage (Film). 1966. Director: Richard Fleischer. Los Angeles, California: Twentieth Centry Fox.
29.
FosterHal. 1988. Vision and Visuality. Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
30.
FrankelFelice C.de PaceAngela. 2012. Visual Strategies: A Practical Guide to Graphics for Scientists and Engineers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
FreitasRobert A.2000. “Some Limits to Global Ecophagy by Biovorous Nanoreplicators, with Public Policy Recommendations.” Foresight Institute. Accessed February 01, 2015. www.foresight.org/nano/Ecophagy.html
32.
GibbonsM.LimogesC.NowotnyH.SchwartzmanS.ScottP.TrowM.. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London, UK: Sage.
33.
GleickJames. 1998. Chaos: The Amazing Science of the Unpredictable. London, UK: Sphere.
34.
GoldmanRobertPapsonStephen. 2011. Landscapes of Capital. London, UK: Polity Press.
35.
GoodsellDavid. 2009. “Fact and Fantasy in Nanotechnology Imagery.” Leonardo42 (1): 52–57.
36.
GranqvistNina. 2011. “Race Against Self-replicating Machines: Framing Science and Fiction in the U.S. Nanotechnology Field.” Organization Studies32 (2): 253–80.
37.
GrodalStine. 2005. “The Emergence of Nanotechnology: A Rhetorical Analysis of an Evolving Field.” Paper presented at the Chemical Heritage Foundation Cain Conference on Nano before There Was Nano: Historical Perspectives on the Constituent Communities of Nanotechnology, Philadelphia, PA, March 19.
38.
GustonD. H.SarewitzD.. 2002. “Real-time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society24:93–109.
39.
HarawayDonna J.1995. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others.” In Cultural Studies, edited by GrossbergLawrenceNelsonCareyTreichlerPaula A.295–338. London, UK: Routledge.
HaylesN. Katherine. 2004. “Connecting the Quantum Dots: Nanotechscience and Culture.” In Nanoculture: Implications of the New Technoscience, edited by Katherine HaylesN.11–27. London, UK: Intellect Books.
43.
HaylesN. Katherine. 2005. My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
HeisenbergW.1925. “Über Quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und Mechanischer Beziehungen.” Zeitschrift für Physik33 (1): 879–93.
LandonBrooks. 2004. “Less Is More: Much Less Is Much More: The Insistence Allure of Nanotechnology Narratives in Science Fiction Literature.” In Nanoculture: Implications of the New Technoscience, edited by Katherine HaylesN.131–46. London, UK: Intellect Books.
52.
LearsJackson. 1994. Fables of Abundance: A Cultural History of Advertising in America. New York: Basic Books.
LintonJonathanWalshSteven. 2012. “Introduction to the Field of Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy.” Journal of Business Ethics109 (4): 547–49
55.
MarcovichAnnShinnTerry. 2011. “Instrument Research, Tools, and the Knowledge Enterprise 1999–2009: Birth and Development of Dip-pen Nanolithography.” Science, Technology, & Human Values36 (6): 864–96.
56.
McCathyWill. 1998. Bloom. London, UK: Del Ray.
57.
McCrayPatrick W.2005. “Will the Small be Beautiful? Making Policies for Our Nanotech Future.” History and Technology21 (2): 177–203.
58.
MerishLori. 1996. “Cuteness and Commodity Aesthetics: Tom Thumb and Shirley Temple.” In Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body, edited by GarlandRosemarie185–203. New York: New York University Press.
59.
MetzChristianGurrieriGeorgia. 1980. “Aural Objects.” Yale French Studies60:24–32.
60.
MilburnColin. 2002. “Nanotechnology in the Age of Posthuman Engineering: Science Fiction as Science.” Configurations10 (2): 261–95.
61.
MilburnColin. 2008. Nanovision: Engineering the Future. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
62.
MilburnColin. 2011. “Just for Fun: The Playful Image of Nanotechnology.” Nanoethics5 (2): 223–32.
63.
MilburnColin. 2012. “Greener on the other Side: Science Fiction and the Problem of Green Nanotechnology.” Configurations20 (1/2): 53–87.
64.
MillerArthur I.1996. “Visualisation Lost and Regained: The Genesis of the Quantum Theory in the Period 1913–1927.” In Electronic Culture, edited by DruckeryTimothy86–107. New York: Aperture.
65.
MitchellW. J. T.1992. The Re-configured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-photographic Era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
MulveyLaura. 1975 (1992). “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” In Film Theory and Criticism, edited byMastGeraldCohenMarshallBraudyLeo746–57. New York: Oxford University Press.
67.
MurphyPadraig. 2010. Nanotechnology: Public Engagement with Health, Environmental and Social Issues. STRIVE Report 61. Wexford, Ireland: Environmental Protection Agency.
Toyota (with Attik). 2003. “Scion Transformer.” Accessed February 01, 2015. http://vimeo.com/66044199
95.
WhittingtonWilliam. 2007. Sound Design and Science Fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press.
96.
WilliamsRaymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
97.
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the Pew Charitable Trusts International Centre for Scholars. 2014. “Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN).” Accessed October 9, 2014. www.nanotechproject.org
