This article explores how citizen participation was methodologically devised and materially articulated in the postdisaster reconstruction of Constitución, one of the most affected cities after the earthquake and tsunami that battered south central Chile in 2010. I argue that the techniques deployed to engineer the participation were arranged as a policy experiment where a particular type of public was provoked—one characterized by its emotional detachment, political engagement, and social tolerance. The case of Constitución, however, also shows that this public ran parallel to other forms of being a public not aligned with the experiment’s assumptions. More broadly, the article argues that while disaster studies need to acknowledge the generative capacities of public participation, science and technology studies should include disasters as a particular setting for participatory experiments.
BeckUlrich. 2004. “The Truth of Others: A Cosmopolitan Approach.” Common Knowledge10 (3): 430–49.
2.
BraunKathrinSchultzSusanne. 2010. “‘… a Certain Amount of Engineering Involved’: Constructing the Public in Participatory Governance Arrangements.” Public Understanding of Science19 (4): 403–19.
3.
BrescianiLuis Eduardo. 2010. “1.000 Pueblos y Ciudades Que Reconstruir.” La Tercera, April 2, 2010.
4.
CallonMichel. 2009. “Civilizing Markets: Carbon Trading between in Vitro and in Vivo Experiments.” Accounting, Organizations and Society34 (3-4): 535–48.
5.
CallonMichelLascoumesPierreBartheYannick. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
ClarkNigel. 2012. Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DowtyRachel A.AllenBarbara L., eds. 2011. Dynamics of Disaster: Lessons on Risk, Response and Recovery. London, UK: Earthscan.
9.
DryzekJ. S.1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10.
EriksonKai. 1978. Everything in Its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Pocket Books.
11.
FeltUlrikeFochlerMaximilian. 2010. “Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement.” Minerva48 (3): 219–38.
12.
ForesterJohn. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
GirardMoniqueStarkDavid. 2007. “Socio-technologies of Assembly: Sense Making and Demonstration in Rebuilding Lower Manhattan.” In Governance and Information: The Rewiring of Governing and Deliberation in the 21st Century, edited by LazerDavidMayer-SchoenbergerViktor, 145–76. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
GrossMatthias. 2011. “Review Essay: Democratizing Scientific Uncertainty.” Public Understanding of Science20 (6): 863–64.
15.
GuggenheimMichael. 2014. “Introduction: Disasters as Politics—Politics as Disasters.” In Disasters and Politics: Materials, Experiments, Preparedness, edited by TironiManuelRodríguez-GiraltIsraelGuggenheimMichael, 1–16. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
16.
HabermasJurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
HackingIan. 1983. Representing, and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HastrupFrida. 2011. Weathering The World: Recovery in the Wake of the Tsunami in a Tamil Fishing Village. New York: Berghahn.
19.
HendersonKathryn. 2011. “Mind Maps, Memory and Relocation after Hurricane Katrina.” In Dynamics of Disaster: Lessons on Risk, Response and Recovery, edited by DowtyRachel A.AllenBarbara L., 77–96. London, UK: Earthscan.
20.
HorstMajaIrwinAlan. 2010. “Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge: On Consensus, Consensusing and False Consensusness.” Social Studies of Science40 (1): 106–26.
21.
IrwinAlan. 2001. “Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences.” Public Understanding of Science10 (1): 1–18.
22.
LakoffAndrewCollierStephen J.. 2010. “Infrastructure and Event: The Political Technology of Preparedness.” In Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy and Public Life, edited by BraunBruceWhatmoreSarah, 243–66. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
LengwilerMartin. 2008. “Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective.” Science, Technology, & Human Values33 (2): 186–200.
25.
LezaunJavier. 2011. “Offshore Democracy: Launch and Landfall of a Socio-technical Experiment.” Economy and Society40 (4): 553–81.
26.
LezaunJavierSonerydLinda. 2007. “Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics.” Public Understanding of Science16 (3): 279–97.
27.
MarresNoortje. 2007. “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy.” Social Studies of Science37 (5): 759–80.
28.
MarresNoortje. 2012. Material Participation. Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
MarresNoortjeLezaunJavier. 2011. “Materials and Devices of the Public: An Introduction.” Economy and Society40 (4): 489–509.
30.
MichaelMike. 2009. “Publics Performing Publics: Of PiGs, PiPs and Politics.” Public Understanding of Science18 (5): 617–31.
MuniesaFabianCallonMichel. 2007. “Economic Experiments and the Construction of Markets.” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by MacKenzieDonaldMuniesaFabianSiuLucia, 163–89. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Oliver-SmithAnthony. 1999. “‘What is a Disaster?’ Anthropological Perspectives on a Persistent Question.” In The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective, edited by HoffmanSusanOliver-SmithAnthony, 1–17. New York: Routledge.
34.
PearceLaurie. 2003. “Disaster Management and Community Planning, and Public Participation: How to Achieve Sustainable Hazard Mitigation.” Natural Hazards28 (2-3): 211–28.
35.
PellingMark. 2007. “Learning from Others: The Scope and Challenges for Participatory Disaster Risk Assessment.” Disasters31 (4): 373–85.
36.
PRES Constitución. 2010a. “Plan Estratégico de Reconstrucción Sustentable” (Power Point presentation). Santiago, Chile.
37.
PRES Constitución. 2010b. “Plan de Participación Ciudadana.” Santiago, Chile.
RheinbergerHans-Jörg. 1997. Towards a History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
41.
RoweG.FrewerL. J.. 2004. “Evaluating Public-participation Exercises: A Research Agenda.” Science, Technology, & Human Values29 (4): 512–56.
42.
RozarioKevin. 2007. The Culture of Calamity: Disaster and the Making of Modern America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
SennettRichard. 1977. The Fall of the Public Men. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
44.
ShapinSteveSchafferSimon. 1989. Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
SteinbergPhilShieldsRob, eds. 2008. What is a City? Rethinking the Urban after Hurricane Katrina. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
46.
StengersIsabelle. 2000. The Invention of Modern Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47.
StonichSusan. 2008. “International Tourism and Disaster Capitalism: The Case of Hurricane Mitch in Honduras.” In Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neoliberal Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction, edited by GunewardenaNandiniSchullerMark, 47–68. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: AltaMira Press.
48.
TironiManuel. 2014. “Atmospheres of Indagation: Disasters and Politics of Excessiveness.” Sociological Review62 (S1): 114–34.
49.
TironiManuelPodujeIvánSommaNicolás. 2011. “Organizaciones Emergentes, Participación Ciudadana y Planificación Urbana: Una Propuesta De Política Pública.” In Camino al Bicentenario. Propuestas para Chile 2010, 275–305. Santiago: P. Universidad Católica de Chile.
