Since the turn of the millennium, the major development agencies have been promoting “knowledge for development,” “ICT for development,” or the “knowledge economy” as new paradigms to prompt development in less-developed countries. These paradigms display an unconditional trust in the power of Western technology and scientific knowledge to trigger development—they taste of epistemic and technological determinism. This article probes, by means of a genealogy, how and when development cooperation began adhering to epistemic and technological determinism, and which forms this adhesion has taken over time. The genealogy shows, first, that knowledge and technology have always been integrally part of the very “development” idea since this idea was shaped during enlightenment. Second, while the genealogy reveals that epistemic and technological determinism were embedded in the development idea from the very beginning, it also illustrates that the determinism has always been challenged by critical voices.
AndersonW.2002. “Introduction: Postcolonial Technoscience.”Social Studies of Science32 (5-6): 643–58.
2.
ArndtH. W.1987. Economic Development. The History of an Idea. London, England: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AvgerouC.2003. “The Link between ICTand Economic Growth in the Discourse of Development.” In Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization, edited by KorpelaM.MontealegreR.PoulymenakouA., 373–86. New York: Springer.
4.
BaserH.MorganP.. 2008. Capacity, Change and Performance. Study report 59B, April 2008. Maastricht, the Netherlands: European Center for Development Policy Management.
5.
BergR. J.Seymour WhitakerJ.. 1993. Strategies for African development. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6.
BijkerW. E.1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7.
Bijker. 2010. “How is Technology Made? That is the Question!”Cambridge Journal of Economics34 (1): 63–76.
8.
ComteA.(1830) 1975. Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
CondorcetMarquis de.1795. Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progres de l’esprit human. Paris, France: Agasse.
10.
CozzensS. E.GatchairS.KimK.-S.OrdoñezG.SupnithadnapornA.. 2008. “Knowledge and Development.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by HackettE. J.AmsterdamskaO.LynchM.WajcmanJ., 787–812. London, England: MIT press.
11.
DescartesR.1964-74. Oeuvre de Descartes, rev. edition. Vol. 12. Paris, France: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
12.
EdquistC., ed. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. New York: Pinter.
13.
EscobarA.1995. Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
EversH. -D.KaiserM.MüllerC.. 2009. “Knowledge in Development: Epistemic Machineries in a Global Context.”ISSJ60 (195): 55–68.
FontenelleB. le Bovier de. (1688) 1752. Œuvres diverses de M. de Fontenelle, Tome Quatrième. Paris, France: Brunet.
17.
FrankA. G.1969. Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution. Essays in the Development of Underdevelopment and the Immediate Enemy. New York: Monthly Review Press.
18.
FreemanC.1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Fukuda-ParrS.LopesC.MalikK.. 2002. Capacity for Development: New Solutions to Old Problems. London, England: Earthscan Publications.
20.
HarawayD.1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspectives.”Feminist Studies14 (3): 575–99.
21.
HeadrickD. R.2010. Power Over Peoples: Technology, Environments, and Western Imperialism, 1400 to the Present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
HumeD. (1752) 1854. “Of the Rise and Progress of the Arts and Sciences.” In The Philosophical Works of David Hume, Vol. III, 119–49. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
23.
JaycoxE. V.1993. “Capacity Building: The Missing Link in African Development.”African-American Institute Conference. African Capacity Building: Effective and Enduring Partnerships. Reston, May 20, 1993.
24.
KingK.McGrathS.. 2004. Knowledge for Development? Comparing British, Japanese, Swedish and World Bank Aid. London, England: Zed Books.
25.
KühlS.2009. “Capacity Development as the Model for Development Aid Organizations.”Development and Change40 (3): 551–77.
26.
LandesD.1998. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. London, England: Abacus.
27.
MansellR.2011. Power and Interests in Information and Communication and Development: Exogenous and Endogenous Discourses in Contention. Journal of International Development. Online first. DOI: 10.1002/jid.1805.
28.
McClellanJ. E. IIIDornH.2006. Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
29.
MehtaL.2001. “Commentary. The World Bank and its Emerging Knowledge Empire.”Human Organization60 (2): 189–96.
30.
MorganL. H.1974 [1877]. Ancient society, or researches in the lines of human progress from savagery through barbarism to civilization. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
31.
MurphyH. M.McBeanE. A.FarahbakhshK.. 2009. “Appropriate Technology: A Comprehensive Approach for Water and Sanitation in the Developing World.”Technology in Society31 (2): 158–67.
32.
NietzscheF. (1887) 1967. On the Genealogy of Morals. New York: Random House.
33.
NolanR. W.2002. Development Anthropology: Encounters in the Real World. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34.
OudshoornN.PinchT.. 2008. “User-technology Relationships: Some Recent Developments.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by HackettE. J.AmsterdamskaO.LynchM.WajcmanJ., 541–66. London, England: MIT press.
35.
OwenD.1950. “The United Nations Program of Technical Assistance.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and social Science270 (1): 109–17.
36.
RistG.1996. Le développement. Histoire d’une croyance occidentale. Paris, France: Presses de Sciences Po.
37.
RomerP. M.1993. “Two Strategies for Economic Development: Using Ideas and Producing Ideas.”Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Development 1992, Supplement to the World Bank Economic Review. Washington, DC: World Bank.
38.
RossE. B.2003. “Malthusianism, Capitalist Agriculture, and the Fate of Peasants in the Making of the Modern World Food System.”Review of Radical Political Economy35 (4): 437–61.
39.
SchumacherE.1973. Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London, England: Blond and Briggs.
40.
SenA.1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
41.
ShahE.2009. Manifesting utopia: History and philosophy of UN debates on science and technology for sustainable development. STEPS Working Paper 25. Brighton, England: STEPS Centre.
42.
SingerH.CooperC.DesaiR. C.FreemanC.GishO.HillS.OldhamG.. 1970. “Draft Introductory Statement for the World Plan of Action for the Application of Science and Technology to Development.” In Science and Technology for Development: Proposals for the Second Development Decade. Annex II. New York: United Nations.
43.
SmithM. R.1994. “Technological Determinism in American Culture.” In Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, edited by SmithM. R.MarxL., 1–36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
StandkeK.2006. “Sixty Years of UN and UNESCO: Science and Technology in Global Cooperation, the Case of the United Nations and UNESCO.”Science and Public Policy33 (9): 627–46.
45.
ThompsonC. (2001) “Situated Knowledge.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences eds. SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B.15532–37. Oxford, England: Elsevier.
UN (United Nations). 1951. Measures for the Economic Development of Underdeveloped Countries. Report by a Group of Experts Appointed by the Secretary-General of the United Nations. New York: United Nations, Dept of Social and Economic Affairs.
48.
UN (United Nations). 1971. World Plan of Action for the Application of Science and Technology for Development. New York: United Nations.
49.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2009. Capacity Development: A UNDP Primer. New York: UNDP.
50.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2001. Human Development Report 2001. Making New Technologies Work for Human Development. New York: UNDP.
51.
VisvanathanS.2001. “Technology transfer.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, (eds). SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B.15532–37. Oxford: Elsevier.
52.
WilsonG.2007. “Knowledge, Innovation and Re-inventing Technical Assistance for Development.”Progress in Development Studies7 (3): 183–99.
World Bank. 1987. World Development Report 1987. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
55.
World Bank. 1998. Knowledge for Development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
56.
WyattS.2008. “Technological Determinism is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by HackettE. J.AmsterdamskaO.LynchM.WajcmanJ., 65–180. London, England: MIT press.
