The New York Times (NYT) receives more citations from academic journals than the American Sociological Review, Research Policy, or the Harvard Law Review. This article explores the reasons why scholars cite the NYT so much. Reasons include studying the newspaper itself or New York City, establishing public interest in a topic by referencing press coverage, introducing specificity, and treating the NYT very much like an academic journal. The phenomenon seems to reflect a mode 2 type of scholarship produced in the context of application, organizationally diverse, socially accountable, and aiming to be socially useful as well as high quality as assessed by peers.
BazermanCharles. 1998. “Emerging Perspectives on the Many Dimensions of Scientific Discourse.” In Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourse of Science, edited by MartinJ. R.VeelRobert, 15–30. London, England: Routledge.
5.
BostwickWendy B.BoydC. J.HughesT. L.McCabeS. E.. 2010. “Dimensions of Sexual Orientation and the Prevalence of Mood and Anxiety Disorders in the United States.”American Journal of Public Health100(3): 468–75.
6.
BurnhillP. M.Tubby-HilleM. E.. 1994. “On Measuring the Relation between Social Science Research Activity and Research Publication.”Research Evaluation3(4): 130–52.
7.
ButlerLindaVisserM. S.. 2006. “Extending Citation Analysis to Non-source Items.”Scientometrics66(2): 327–43.
8.
CamicC.1992. “Reputation and Predecessor Selection: Parsons and the Institutionalists.”American Sociological Review57(4): 421–45.
9.
CamicC.GrossN.LamontM.. 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CareyJ. W.1986. “Why and How?” In Reading the News, edited by ManoffR. K.SchudsonM., 146–96. New York: Pantheon.
11.
CelliniStephanie RieggFerreiraF.RothsteinJ.. 2010. “The Value of School Facility Investments: Evidence from a Dynamic Regression Discontinuity Design.”Quarterly Journal of Economics125(1): 215–61
12.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM.. 2007. “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges.”Academy of Management Review50(1): 25–32.
EvansJ. H.2005. “Stratification in Knowledge Production: Author Prestige and the Influence of an American Academic Debate.”Poetics33(2): 111–33.
15.
FriedmanMilton. 1970, September 13. “The Social Responsibility of Business Is To Increase Its Profits.”New York Times Magazine32: 122–126.
16.
FullerS.1991. “Disciplinary Boundaries and the Rhetoric of the Social.”Poetics Today12(2): 301–25.
17.
GarfieldEugene. 1975. “The Obliteration Phenomenon.”Current Contents51/52 (December): 5–7.
18.
GibbonsM.LimogesC.NowotnyH.SchwartzmanS.ScottP.TrowM.. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London, England: Sage.
19.
GierynT. F.1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.”American Sociological Review48(6): 781–95.
20.
GierynT. F.1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
GolanG. 2006. “Inter-media Agenda Setting and Global News Coverage: Assessing the Influence of the New York Times on Three Network Television Evening News Programs. Journalism Studies7 (2): 323–33.
22.
GoliasMihalisBoileM.TheofanisS.EfstathiouC.. 2010. “The Berth-Scheduling Problem.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2166(1): 20–27.
23.
HargensLowell. 2004. “What is Mertonian Sociology of Science?”Scientometrics60(1): 63–70.
24.
HicksDiana. 2004. “The Four Literatures of Social Science.” In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Studies, edited by MoedH.GlänzelW.SchmochU., 473–96. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
25.
Knorr-CetinaK.2011. “Financial Analysis: Epistemic Profile of an Evaluative Science.” In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by CamicC.GrossN.LamontM., 405–42. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
KushnerBarak. 2010. “Treacherous Allies: The Cold War in East Asia and American Postwar Anxiety.”Journal of Contemporary History45(4): 812–43.
27.
LamontM.MolnarV.. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.”Annual Review of Sociology28(1): 167–95.
28.
LatourBruno. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. London, England: Polity.
29.
LatourBrunoStevenWoolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
LorinC.SiemkoA.TodescoE.VerweijA.. 2010. “Predicting the Quench Behavior of the LHC Dipoles During Commissioning.”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity20(3): 135–39.
31.
MacDonaldS. P.1994. Professional Academic Writing in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
32.
ManoffR. K.SchudsonM.. eds. 1986. Reading the News. New York: Pantheon.
33.
NederhofA. J.van LeeuwenT. N.van RaanA. F. J.. 2010. “Highly Cited Non-journal Publications in Political Science, Economics and Psychology: A First Exploration.”Scientometrics83(2): 363–74.
34.
NederhofA. J.ZwaanR. A.. 1991. “Quality Judgments of Journals as Indicators of Research Performance in the Humanities and the Social and Behavioral Sciences.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science42(5): 332–40.
35.
OsreckiFran. 2012. “Diagnosing the Present: Towards a Sociology of Medialized Social Science.” In The Sciences’ Media Connection—Public Communication and its Repercussions Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, edited by RödderS.FranzenM.WeingartP., 307–22. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
36.
PeckJamieTheodoreN.BrennerN.. 2010. “Postneoliberalism and Its Malcontents.”Antipode41(s1): 94–116.
37.
PhillipsDavidKanterE. J.BednarczykB.TalstadP. L.. 1991. “Importance of the Lay Press in the Transmission of Medical Knowledge to the Scientific Community.”The New England Journal of Medicine325(16), 1180–83.
38.
PlaceBenAndersonB.MekebriA.FurlongE. T.GrayJ. L.TjeerdemaR.FieldJ.. 2010. “A Role for Analytical Chemistry in Advancing our Understanding of the Occurrence, Fate, and Effects of Corexit Oil Dispersants.”Environmental Science & Technology44(16): 6016–18.
39.
RafolsIshmaelPorterAlanLeydesdorffLoet. 2010. “Science Overlay Maps: A New Tool for Research Policy and Library Management.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61(1): 871–87.
40.
RödderS.FranzenM.WeingartP.. eds. 2012. The Sciences’ Media Connection—Public Communication and its Repercussions, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
41.
SaravananKuppanBalayaP.ReddyM. V.ChowdariB. V. R.VittalJ. J.. 2010. “Morphology Controlled Synthesis of LiFePO4/C Nanoplates for Li-Ion Batteries.”Energy & Environmental Science3(4): 457–63.
42.
SchudsonMichael. 1978. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.
43.
SchudsonMichael. 2003. Sociology of the News. New York: Norton.
44.
SchudsonMichael. 2010. “Political Observatories, Databases & News in the Emerging Ecology of Public Information.”Daedulus139(2): 100–109.
45.
SeltzerW.2011. “Exposing the Flaws of Censorship by Domain Name.”Security & Privacy, IEEE9(1): 83–87.
46.
ShoemakerPamela J.ReeseStephen D.. 1996. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. New York: Longman.
TaubertNiels C.2012. “Minerva and the Development of Science (Policy) Studies.”Minerva50(3): 261–75.
49.
TurnpennyJohnJonesMavisLorenzoniIrene. 2010. “Where Now for Post-normal Science?: A Critical Review of its Development, Definitions, and Uses.”Science, Technology, & Human Values36(3): 287–306.
50.
ValiantGregoryRoughgardenT.. 2010. “Braess’s Paradox in Large Random Graphs.”Random Structures & Algorithms37(4): 495–515.
51.
WeingartPeter. 2001. “The Loss of Distance: Science in Transition.” In Science, History and Social Activism: A Tribute to Everett Mendelsohn, edited by AllenG. E.MacLeodR. M., 167–84. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
52.
WignellPeter. 1998. “Technicality and Abstraction in Social Science.” In Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourse of Science, edited by MartinJ. R.VeelR., 297–326. London, England: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
