The authors assess the collaboration between the University of California, Berkeley’s Community Assessment of Renewable Energy and Sustainability program and the Pinoleville Pomo Nation, a small Native American tribal nation in northern California. The collaboration focused on creating culturally inspired, environmentally sustainable housing for tribal citizens using a codesign methodology developed at the university. The housing design process is evaluated in terms of both its contribution to Native American “cultural sovereignty,” as elaborated by Coffey and Tsosie, and as a potential example of the democratization of scientific practice.
ArnsteinS. R.1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.”Journal of the American Institute of Planners35 (4): 216–24.
2.
BakerM.2012. “Federal Tribal Housing Policies and their Impact on Residential Energy Use by the Pinoleville Pomo Nation.”Unpublished master’s thesis. Environmental Management, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
3.
CashD. W.ClarkW. C.AlcockF.DicksonN. M.EckleyN.GustonD. H.JägerJ.MitchellR. B.. 2003. “Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development. ”PNAS100 (14): 8086–91.
CliffordJ.2004. “Traditional Futures.” In Questions of Tradition, edited by PhillipsM.SchochetG., 152–70. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
6.
CoffeyW.TsosieR.. 2001. “Rethinking the Tribal Sovereignty Doctrine: Cultural Sovereignty and the Collective Future of Indian Nations.”Stanford Law & Policy Review12 (2): 191–221.
7.
CondonP.2008. Design Charrettes for Sustainable Communities. London, UK: Island Press.
8.
DavisV.2002. “A Discovery of Sorts: Re-examining the Origins of the Federal Indian Housing Obligation.”Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal18 (Spring): 211–39.
9.
DeloriaB.FoehnerK.EdsS. Scinta.. 1999. Spirit and Reason: The Vine Deloria, Jr. Reader. Golden, CO: Fulcrum.
10.
DeloriaV.WildcatD.. 2001. Power and Place: Indian Education in America. Golden, CO: Fulcrum.
11.
DouthwaiteB.2002. Enabling Innovation: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Fostering Technological Change. London, UK: Zed Books.
12.
FortmannL.1996. “Gendered Knowledge: Rights and Space in Two Zimbabwe Villages.” In Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences, edited by RocheleauD.Thomas-SlayterB.WanagariE., 211–23. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
HarawayD.1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.”Feminist Studies14 (3): 575–99.
14.
HardingS.1995. “‘Strong Objectivity:’ A Response to the New Objectivity Question.”Synthese104 (3): 331–49.
15.
IshiyamaN.TsosieM.KamataJ.. 2011. “Racialized Space of Exception and Environmental History: A WWII Concentration Camp on the Colorado River Indian Reservation.”Paper presented at the Department of Environment, Society, Policy and Management Spring Colloquium, University of California, Berkeley, CA, February 7, 2011.
16.
KlerkxL.SchutM.LeeuwisC.KileluC.. 2012. “Advances in Knowledge Brokering in the Agricultural Sector: Towards an Innovation System Facilitation.”IDS Bulletin43 (5), 53–60.
17.
McCullochA.WilkinsD.. 1995. “‘Constructing’ Nations within States: The Quest for Federal Recognition by the Catawba and Lumbee Tribes.”American Indian Quarterly19 (3): 361–88.
18.
OehlbergL.ShelbyR.AgoginoA.. 2010. “Sustainable Product Design: Designing for Diversity in Engineering Education.”International Journal of Engineering Education26 (2): 489–98.
19.
RölingN.2009. “Pathway for Impact: Scientists’ Different Perspectives on Agricultural Innovation.”International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability7 (2): 83–94.
20.
ScottJ.1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
ShelbyR.PattenE.FarzanaA.PruittA.WalkerG.WangJ.. 2013. “Implementation of Leadership and Service Learning in a First-year Engineering Course Enhances Professional Skills.”International Journal of Engineering Education29 (1): 1–14.
22.
ShelbyR.PerezY.AgoginoA.. 2011. “Co-design Methodology for the Development of Sustainable and Renewable Energy Systems for Underserved Communities: A Case Study with the Pinoleville Pomo Nation.” In Proceedings of ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (IDETC), Washington, DC, USA, August 29-31, 2011.
23.
ShelbyR.PerezY.AgoginoA.. 2012. “Partnering with the Pinoleville Pomo Nation: Co-design Methodology Case Study for Creating Sustainable, Culturally Inspired Renewable Energy Systems and Infrastructure.”Sustainability4 (5): 794–818.
24.
TallBearK. (2013). “Genomic Articulations of Indigeneity.”Social Studies of Science. In press.
25.
Watson-VerranH.TurnbullD.. 1995. “Science and Other Indigenous Knowledge Systems.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by JasanoffS.MarkleG.PetersenJ.FinchT., 115–39. New York, NY: Sage.
26.
WhyteW.1990. Participatory Action Research. New York, NY: Sage.
27.
WollenbergE.EdmundsD.BuckL.. 2000. “Using Scenarios to Make Decisions About the Future: Anticipatory Learning for the Adaptive Co-management of Community Forests.”Landscape and Urban Planning47(1/2): 65–77.
28.
WoodhillJ.2010. “Capacities for Institutional Innovation: A Complexity Perspective.”IDS Bulletin41 (3): 47–59.
