Scholars working in science and technology studies have recently argued that we could learn much about the nature of scientific knowledge by paying closer attention to scientific ignorance. Building on the work of Robert Proctor, this article shows how ignorance can stem from a wide range of selective research choices that incline researchers toward partial, limited understandings of complex phenomena. A recent report produced by the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science, and Technology for Development serves as the article’s central case study. After arguing that the forms of selective ignorance illustrated in cases like this one are both socially important and difficult to address, I suggest several strategies for responding to them in a socially responsible manner.
BoeninkM.2012. “Debating the Desirability of New Biomedical Technologies: Lessons from the Introduction of Breast Cancer Screening in the Netherlands.”Health Care Analysis20 (1): 84–102.
3.
CallonM.1994. “Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March 1993.”Science, Technology, and Human Values19 (4): 395–424.
4.
ColbornT.DumanoskiD.MyersJ.. 1996. Our Stolen Future. New York: Dutton.
5.
DahlbergK.1979. Beyond the Green Revolution: The Ecology and Politics of Global Agricultural Development. New York: Plenum.
6.
DickersinK.1990. “The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence.”Journal of the American Medical Association263 (10): 1385–9.
7.
DouglasH.2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
8.
EasterbrookP.BerlinJ.GopalanR.MatthewsD.. 1991. “Publication Bias in Clinical Research.”Lancet337 (8746): 867–72.
9.
ElliottK.2009. “The Ethical Significance of Language in the Environmental Sciences: Case Studies from Pollution Research.”Ethics, Place, & Environment12 (2): 157–73.
10.
ElliottK.2011. Is a Little Pollution Good for You? Incorporating Societal Values in Environmental Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
FiorinoD.1990. “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms.”Science, Technology, and Human Values15 (2): 226–43.
12.
FisherE.MahajanR.. 2010. “Embedding the Humanities in Engineering: Art, Dialogue, and a Laboratory.” In Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration, edited by GormanM., 209–30. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13.
FortunK.FortunM.. 2005. “Scientific Imaginaries and Ethical Plateaus in Contemporary U.S. Toxicology.”American Anthropology107 (1): 43–54.
14.
FrickerM.2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
FrodemanR.KleinJ. T.MitchamC.. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
GalisonP.2008. “Removing Knowledge: The Logic of Modern Censorship.” In Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, edited by ProctorR.SchiebingerL., 37–54. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
GiereR.2006. Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
GriffinK.1974. The Political Economy of Agrarian Change: An Essay on the Green Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
GustonD.1999. “Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizen’s Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy.”Science, Technology, and Human Values24 (4): 451–82.
20.
HollisA.PoggeT.. 2008. The Health Impact Fund: Making Medicines Available to All. New Haven, CT: Incentives for Global Health.
21.
IAASTD (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science, and Technology for Development). 2009a. Agriculture at a Crossroads: Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report. Washington, DC: Island Press.
22.
IAASTD (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science, and Technology for Development). 2009b. Agriculture at a Crossroads: Global Report. Washington, DC: Island Press.
23.
IAASTD (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science, and Technology for Development). 2009c. Agriculture at a Crossroads: Global Summary for Decision Makers. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24.
JasanoffS.1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
JossS.DurantJ.. 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.
26.
KellertS.LonginoH.WatersK., eds. 2006. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
KincaidH.DupréJ.WylieA., eds. 2007. Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
KitcherP.2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
KloppenburgJ.1988. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 1492-2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
KrohnW.WeingartP.. 1987. “Commentary: Nuclear Power as a Social Experiment—European Political ‘Fall Out’ from the Chernobyl Meltdown.”Science, Technology, & Human Values12 (2): 52–8.
31.
LaceyH. 1999. Is Science Value Free?London: Routledge.
32.
LamplandM.StarS. L., eds. 2009. Standards and Their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shapes Everyday Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
33.
LarsonB.2011. Metaphors for Environmental Sustainability: Redefining Our Relationship with Nature. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
MarcusG., ed. 1995. Technoscientific Imaginaries: Conversations, Profiles, and Memoirs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
MillsC. W.1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
36.
MitchellS.2009. Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38.
PatelR.2007. Stuffed and Starved: The Hidden Battle for the World’s Food System. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.
PielkeR.Jr. 2010. The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won’t Tell You About Global Warming. New York: Basic Books.
41.
ProctorR.2008. “Agnotology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of Ignorance (and Its Study).” In Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, edited by ProctorR.SchiebingerL., 1–36. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42.
ProctorR.SchiebingerL.. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
SchiebingerL.2008. “West Indian Abortifacients and the Making of Ignorance.” In Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, edited by ProctorR.SchiebingerL., 149–62. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47.
ShivaV.1988. “Reductionist Science as Epistemological Violence.” In Science, Hegemony, and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity, edited by NandyA., 232–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
ShivaV.. 1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology, and Politics. London: Zed Books.
49.
SismondoS.2004. “Pharmaceutical Maneuvers.”Social Studies of Science34 (2): 149–59.
50.
StengelK.TaylorJ.WatertonC.WynneB.. 2009. “Plant Sciences and the Public Good.”Science, Technology, and Human Values34 (3): 289–312.
51.
StokstadE.2008. “Dueling Visions for a Hungry World.”Science319 (14 March): 1474–76.
52.
SullivanS.TuanaN., eds. 2007. Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
53.
ThompsonP.1995. The Spirit of the Soil: Agriculture and Environmental Ethics. London: Routledge.
54.
ThompsonP.StoutB., eds. 1991. Beyond the Large Farm: Ethics and Research Goals for Agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
55.
TuanaN.2006. “The Speculum of Ignorance: The Women’s Health Movement and Epistemologies of Ignorance.”Hypatia21 (3): 1–19.
56.
WhiteheadA. N.1925. Science and the Modern World. New York: Macmillan.
