It is often assumed that it was the alliance between patient associations and neuroscience, which originally made dementia a matter for intervention. In parallel ways, science and technology studies (STS) often attributes the power to define and act upon matters of life to biomedicine and science. The concern here is that the science centrism of STS contributes to the dominance of science and biomedicine by granting these analytical privileges. As a result, alternative modes of acting, for instance in care, are disarticulated and made absent. This article mobilizes the sensibilities of anthropology to difference and draws upon excerpts of data from fieldwork in dementia care to show this and argue that there are different practices that act upon life and its limits; that these enact different versions of life and dementia; and that they matter because they shape how people are cared for and live and die with dementia.
Asdal, K.2007. Re-inventing politics of the state. Science and the politics of contestation. In Technoscience. The politics of interventions , ed. K. Asdal, B. Brenna, and I. Moser, 309-26. Oslo : OsloAcademic Press.
2.
Ballenger, J.F.2006. Self, senility, and Alzheimer’s disease in modern America. A history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Berg, M., and A. Mol, eds. 1998. Differences in medicine: Unravelling practices, technique and bodies. Durham: Duke University Press.
4.
Bond, J.1992. The medicalization of dementia. Journal of Aging Studies6:397-403.
5.
Callon, M., and V. Rabeharisoa.2004. Gino’s lesson on humanity: Genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist’s role. Economy and Society33(1):1-27.
6.
Fischer, M.M.J.2003. Emergent forms of life and the anthropological voice. Durham: Duke University Press.
7.
Foucault, M.1981. The history of sexuality, Vol.1: An introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
8.
Fox, P.1989. From senility to Alzheimer’s disease: The rise of the Alzheimer’s disease movement. The Milbank Quarterly67:58-102.
9.
Franklin, S., and M. Lock, eds. 2001. Remaking life & death. Toward an anthropology of the Biosciences. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
10.
Hacking, I.1999. The social construction of what?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Haraway, D.1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature . London: Free Association Books .
12.
Harbers, H., ed. 2005. Inside the politics of technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
13.
Kaufman, S.2006. Dementia-near-death and ‘‘life itself’’ . In Thinking about dementia. Culture, loss, and the anthropology of senility (pp. 23-42), ed. A. Leibing and L. Cohen.New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
14.
Kleinman, A.1979. Patients and healers in the context of culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Kleinman, A.1995. Writing at the margin. Discourse between anthropology and medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Kontopodis, M., J. Niewöhner, and S. Beck.2011. Investigating emerging biomedical practices . Zones of awkward engagement on different scales. Science, Technology, & Human Values36:599-615.
17.
Latour, B.1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Law, J.2004. After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
20.
Law, J., and V. Singleton.2000. Performing technology’s stories: On social constructivism, performance, and performativity. Technology and Culture41:765-75.
21.
Leibing, A., and L. Cohen2006. Thinking about dementia. Culture, loss, and the anthropology of senility. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
22.
Lock, M.2001. On making up the good-as-dead in a utilitarian world. In Remaking life and death. Toward an anthropology of the biosciences , ed. S. Franklin and M. Lock.Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
23.
Lock, M.2002. Twice dead. Organ transplants and the reinvention of death . Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
Lock, M.2011. Dementia entanglements in a postgenomic era. Science, Technology, & Human Values36:685-703.
25.
Lock, M., S. Lloyd, and J. Prest.2006. Genetic susceptibility and Alzheimer’s disease: The penetrance and uptake of genetic knowledge. In Thinking about dementia. Culture, loss, and the anthropology of senility (pp. 123-154), ed. A. Leibing and L. Cohen.New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Martin, E.1998. Anthropology and the cultural study of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values23:24-43.
28.
Mol, A.2002. The body multiple. An ontology of medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
29.
Mol, A.2008. The logic of caring. London: Routledge.
30.
Mol, A.2010. Care and its values. Good food in the nursing home. In Care in practice. On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms, ed. A. Mol, I. Moser, and J. Pols.Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
31.
Mol, A., and J. Law.2004. Situated bodies and distributed selves: Enacting hypoclycaemia. Body & Society10:43-62.
32.
Mol, A., I. Moser , and J. Pols, eds. 2010. Care in practice. On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms . Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
33.
Moreira, T.2009. Hope and truth in drug development and evaluation in Alzheimer’s Disease. In Treating dementia: Do we have a pill for it? (pp. 210-230), ed. J. Ballenger et al. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
Moreira, T., and P. Palladino.2009. Ageing between gerontology and biomedicine . Biosocieties4:348-65.
35.
Moreira, T., C. May, and J. Bond.2009. Regulatory objectivity in action: Mild cognitive impairment and the collective production of uncertainty. Social Studies of Science39:665-90.
36.
Moser, I.2008. Making Alzheimer’s disease matter: Enacting, interfering and doing politics of nature. Geoforum39:98-110.
37.
Moser, I.2009. Diagnosing and acting upon dementia: Marte meo. In Ethnographies of diagnostic work. Dimensions of transformative practice (pp. 195-210), ed. M. Buscher, J. Mesman, and D. Goodwin.London: Palgrave, Macmillan.
38.
Moser, I.2009. Diagnosing and acting upon dementia: Marte meo. In Ethnographies of diagnostic work. Dimensions of transformative practice , ed. M. Buscher, J. Mesman, and D. Goodwin.London: Palgrave & Macmillan.
39.
Moser, I.2010. Perhaps tears should not be counted, but wiped away. On quality and improvement in dementia care. In Caring in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 277-300), ed. A. Mol, I. Moser, and J. Pols.Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
40.
Moser, I. In press. Subjects of dementia care: Practices, ordering and power in cultures of caring.
41.
Pols, J.2004. Good care. Enacting a complex ideal in long-term psychiatry. PhD thesis, Trimbos Instituut, Utrecht.
42.
Pols, J.2010. Breathtaking practicalities. A politics of embodied patient positions. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research.
43.
Prins, A.1998. Aging and expertise. Alzheimer’s disease and the medical professions 1930 -1990. PhD -diss., University of Amsterdam.
44.
Ridder, H.M.O.2005. Musik & Demens [Music and dementia]. Århus: KLIM Publications.
45.
Rose, N.2006. The politics of life itself. Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Taylor, J.2010. Recognition, caring and dementia. In Caring in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 27-56), ed. A. Mol, I. Moser , and J. Pols.Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
