The aim of this work is to provide a way to investigate design practices that allows a focus on the movements and the transformations that lie behind designed products, which usually lose contact with their own original conditions of design and production. Through a detailed analysis of the design of a new artifact (a piece of jewelry) and in contrast with reductionist accounts of design practices, the notion of thing is introduced in a twofold meaning: a gathering of different elements and a problematic issue in process of definition. In investigating the relationship between these two folds lying behind the making of a new artifact, two underlying logics and tendencies are individualized and discussed in detail. These are objectifying and thinging tendencies. A discussion of how the proposed framework contribute to design studies and practices is offered in the conclusion.
AppaduraiA., ed. 1986. The social life of things—Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AkrichM. 1992. The description of technical objects. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in socio-technical change (pp. 205–224), ed. BijkerW.LawJ. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3.
BergA. J. 1985. A gendered socio-technical construction: The smart house. In The social shaping of technology, ed. MacKenzieD.WajcmanJ. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4.
BijkerW. 1995. Of bicycle, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5.
BijkerW.LawJ., eds. 1992. Shaping technology/building society: Studies on sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
6.
BijkerW.PinchT.HughesT. P., eds. 1987. The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7.
BowkerG.StarS. L. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
BrownB. 2002. A thing about things: The art of decoration in the work of Henry James. The Henry James Review23:222–32.
10.
BrownB., ed. 2005. Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CallonM. 1986. The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle: Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. In Sociology of science in the real world(pp. 19-34), ed. CallonM.LawJ.RipA. Basingstoke.
12.
CleggS. R.HardyC. 1996. Organizations, organization and organizing. In Handbook of organizational studies, ed. BaumJ. A. C.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
CooperR.LawJ. 1995. Organization: Distal and proximal views. In Research in the sociology of organizations, ed. BacharachS. B.GagliardiP.MundellB., 13, 237–274. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14.
DeleuzeG. 1968. Difference et repetition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
15.
EglashR.CroissantJennifer L.ChiroGiovanna DiFouchéRayvon, eds. 2004. Appropriating technology. Vernacular science and social power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
EwensteinB.WhyteJ. 2009. Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects.’Organization Studies30:7–30.
17.
FlusserV. 1999. Philosophy of design: The shape of things. London, Reaktion Books.
HaddonL.ManteE.SapioB.KommonenK.-H.FortunatiL.KantA. 2005. Everyday innovators: Researching the role of users in shaping ICTs. Dordrecht: Springer.
20.
HarmanG. 2007. Heidegger explained: From phenomenon to thing. Chicago: Open Court.
21.
HeideggerM. 1967. Das Ding. Neske: Vortrge und Aufstze.
22.
HoudartS. 2008. Copying, cutting and pasting social spheres: Computer designers’ participation in architectural projects. Science Studies21:47–63.
23.
HughesT. P. 1983. Networks of power: Electrification in western society 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
HughesT. P. 1985. Edisonand electric light. In The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum, ed. MacKenzieD.WajcmanJ. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
25.
KrippendorffK. 2006. The semantic turn; A new foundation for design. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
26.
LatourB. 1984. Les Microbes: guerre et paix suivi de irreductions. Paris: A.M. Metailie.
27.
LatourB. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
28.
LatourB. 1991. Technology is society made durable. In Sociology of monsters, ed. LawJ. London: Routledge.
29.
LatourB. 1992. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Shaping technology/building society, ed. BijkerW.LawJ. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
30.
LatourB. 1994. On technical mediation. Common Knowledge3:29–60.
31.
LatourB. 1996. Aramis, or the love of technology. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
32.
LatourB. 2005. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. In Things, ed. BrownB. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Journals.
33.
LatourB.WeibelP. 2005. Making things public, atmosphere of democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34.
LawJ. 1987. Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In The social construction of technological systems, ed. PinchT.BijkerW. E.HughesP. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
35.
LawJ. 1992. The Olympus 320 Engine: A case study in design: Development, and organizational control. Technology and Culture33:409–40.
LawJ. 2002. Aircraft stories. Decentring the object of technoscience. London: Duke University Press.
38.
LawJ.CallonM. 1992. The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In Shaping technology/building society, ed. BijkerW.LawJ. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
39.
LawsonB. 1980/1997. How designers think: the design process demystified, 5th ed. Oxford: Elsevier.
40.
LevyP. 1995. Qu’est-ce que le virtuel?Paris: La Decouverte.
41.
LieM.SorensenK. 1996. Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Scandinavian University Press North.
42.
MacKenzieD.WajcmanJ., eds. 1985/1999. The social shaping of technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
43.
MolotchH. 2003. Where stuff come from. New York: Routledge.
44.
OusgoodN.PinchT. 2004. How users matter, the co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
45.
PelsD.HetheringtonK.VandenbergheF. 2002. The status of the object: Performances, mediations, and techniques. Theory, Culture & Society19:1–21.
46.
PinchT. J.BijkerW. E. 1984. The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science14:3.
47.
RittelH.WebberM. M. 1984. Planning problems are wicked problems. In Developments in design methodology, ed. CrossN. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
48.
RoweG. P. 1987. Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
49.
SchönD. 1991. The reflexive practitioner: How professional think in action. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
50.
SchönD.BennettJ. 1996. Reflective conversation with materials. In Bringing design to software, ed. WinogradT., 171–89. New York, NY: ACM.
51.
SchönD. A.WigginsG. 1992. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Study13:135–56.
52.
SimonH. A. 1981. The science of artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
53.
StorniC. 2007. Design in practices: On the construction of objects. PhD dissertation, University of Trento.
54.
StorniC. 2009. Cose di design: sulla nascita degli arte-fatti. E/C Il discorso del design, ed. Mangano and Mattozzi3-4:225–38.
55.
SuchmanL. 2000. Organizing alignment: A case of bridge building. Organization7:311–27.
56.
TelierA.BinderT.De MichelisG.EhnP.JacucciG.LindeP.WagnerI. 2011. Designing things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
WeickK. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
59.
YanevaA. 2005. Scaling up and down: Extraction trials in architectural design. Social Studies of Science35:867–94.
60.
YanevaA. 2008. How buildings ‘surprise’: The renovation of the Alte Aula in Vienna. Science Studies: An International Journal of Science and Technology21:8–29.
61.
YanevaA. 2009. Making the social hold: Towards an Actor-network theory of design. Design and Culture1:273–88.
