Beck, U.1992. The risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.
2.
Beck, U.2008. World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3.
Beck, U., and C. Lau.2005. Second modernity as a research agenda: theoretical and empirical explorations in the ‘meta-change’ of modern society. British Journal of Sociology56:525-57.
4.
Böschen, St.2005. Reflexive Wissenspolitik: Zur Formierung und Strukturierung von Gestaltungsöffentlichkeiten. In Wozu Experten?, eds. Bogner, Alexander / Torgersen, Helge, 241-63. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag.
5.
Braun, K.2005. Not just for experts. The public debate on reprogenetics in Germany. Hastings Center Report35 (3):42-9.
6.
Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and J. Barthe.2001. Agir dans un monde uncertain. Essay sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Seuil.
7.
Collins, H., and R. Evans.2007. Rethinking expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
Dean, M.1999. Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE.
9.
Douglas, H.2009. Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10.
Falk, S., A. Römmele , et al., eds. 2006. Handbuch Politikberatung . Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwissenschaften .
11.
Frankenfeld, Ph.1992. Technological citizenship: A normative framework for risk studies. Science, Technology, & Human ValuesV17 (4):459-84.
12.
Functowicz, S.O., and J.R. Ravetz.1992. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In Social theories of risk , ed. S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 251-74. Westport: Praeger.
13.
Gieryn, Th. F.1999. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Hajer, M. A., and H. Wagenaar, eds. 2003. Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
Irwin, A.2006. The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘‘new’’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science63 (2):299-320.
17.
Jasanoff, S.1994. The fifth branch. Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Jasanoff, S.2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. London: Routledge .
19.
Joss, S.2002. Toward the public sphere-Reflections on the development of participatory technology assessment.’’. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society22: 220-31.
20.
Latour, B.1993. We have never been modern. Harvard : Harvard University Press.
21.
Leach, M.,I. Scoones , and B. Wynne, eds. 2005. Science and citizens, globalization and the challenge of engagement. London/New York: Zed Books.
22.
Lengwiler, M.2008. Participatory approaches in science and technology. Historical origins and current practices in critical perspective. Science, Technology, & Human Values33 (2):186-200.
23.
Levidow, L.1998. Democratizing technology-Or technologizing democracy? Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe.’’ Technology in Society20: 211-26.
24.
Levidow, L.1999. Britain’s biotechnology controversy: Elusive science, contested expertise. New Genetics and Society18 (1):47-64.
25.
Maasen, S., and P. Weingart , eds. 2005. Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making. Dordrecht: Springer.
26.
Neidhardt, F., R. Mayntz, and et al. 2008. Wissensproduktion und Wissenstransfer. Zur Einleitung. In Wissensproduktion und Wissenstransfer. Wissen im Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft, Politik und Öffentlichkeit, ed. Mayntz R., F. Neidhardt, P. Weingart and U. Wengenroth.Bielefeld: transcript.
27.
Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons.2001. Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
28.
Rowe, G., and L. Frewer.2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation.’’ Science, Technology and Human Values25 (1):3-29.
29.
Rowe, G., and L.J. Frewer.2005. A typology of public engagement mechanisms . Science, Technology, & Human Values30:251-90.
30.
Stehr, N.2005. Knowledge politics: Governing the consequences of science and technology. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
31.
Trute, H.H.2005. Democratising science: Expertise and participation in administrative decision-making. In The public nature of science under assault. Politics, markets, science and the law, ed. Nowotny, H., et al., 87-108. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer.
32.
Wehling, P.2004. Reflexive Wissenspolitik: Öffnung und Erweiterung eines neuen Politikfeldes. Technikfolgenabschätzung. Theorie und Praxis13 (3):63-71.
33.
Wildavsky, A.1979. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis . Boston: Little, Brown and Company .
34.
Wynne, B.1993. Public uptake of science: A case for institutional reflexivity . Public Understanding of Science2 (4):321-37.
35.
Wynne, B.1996. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In Risk, environment and modernity, ed. S. Lash, et al., 44-83. London : SAGE.
36.
Wynne, B.2001. Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture10:445-481.