As museums begin to revisit their definition of ‘‘expert’’ in light of theories about the local character of knowledge, questions emerge about how museums can reconsider their documentation of knowledge about objects. How can a museum present different and possibly conflicting perspectives in such a way that the tension between them is preserved? This article expands upon a collaborative research project between the Museum of Anthropology and Archaeology at Cambridge University, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and the A:shiwi A:wan Museum and Heritage Center to compare descriptions of museum objects by multiple expert communities. We found that narratives and objects in use are key omissions in traditional museum documentation, offering us several possibilities to expand our concept of digital objects. Digital objects will allow members of indigenous source communities to contribute descriptive information about objects to support local cultural revitalization efforts and also to influence how objects are represented in distant cultural institutions.
Ames, Michael.1992. Cannibal tours and glass boxes: The anthropology of museums . Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
2.
Ames, Michael.1999. How to decorate a house: The re-negotiation of cultural representations at the University of British Columbia Museum of Anthropology . Museum Anthropology22:41-51.
3.
Arendt, Hannah.1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Appadurai, Arjun.1986. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective, ed. Arjun Appadurai, 3-63. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Appadurai, Arjun.1996. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy . In Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization , ed. Arjun Appadurai, 27-47. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
6.
Benjamin, Walter.1935. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction . In Illuminations, ed. Arendt Hannah, trans. Harry Zohn, 219-53. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1955.
7.
Bennett, Tony.1995. The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. London: Routledge.
8.
Bennett, Tony.2005. Civic laboratories: Museums, cultural objecthood, and the governance of the social. Cultural Studies19:521-47.
9.
Bishop, Ann, Imanie Bazzell, Bharat Mehra, and Cynthia Smith.2001. Afya: Social and digital technologies that reach across the digital divide. First Monday6. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_4/bishop/index.html (accessed July 25, 2008).
10.
Boast, Robin.1997. A small company of actors: A critique of style. Journal of Material Culture2:173-98.
11.
Boast, Robin.2000. Speculum, Exemplar, Imago. In N01SE: Universal language, pattern recognition, data synaesthetics, ed. A. Lowe and S. Schaffer.Cambridge: Kettle’s Yard.
12.
Boast, Robin, Michael Bravo, and Ramesh Srinivasan .2007. Return to Babel: Emergent diversity, digital resources, and local knowledge. The Information Society23:395-403.
13.
Canadian Heritage Information Network.2007 . Standards. http://www.chin.gc.ca/English/Standards/index.html (accessed April 15, 2009).
14.
Christen, Kimberly.2006. Ara Irititja: Protecting the past, accessing the future: Indigenous memories in a digital age. A digital archive project of the Pitjantjatjara Council. Museum Anthropology29:56-60.
15.
Christie, Michael.2000. Galtha: The application of Aboriginal philosophy to school learning. New Horizons in Education103:3-19.
16.
Clifford, James.1988. The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Clifford, James.1997. Museums as contact zones. In Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century, 188-219. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Connolly, William E.2005. Pluralism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
Curtis, Neal G. W.2006. Universal museums, museum objects, and repatriation: The tangled lives of things. Museum Management and Curatorship21: 117-21.
20.
Dahl, G.B., and Ronald Stade.2000. Anthropology, museums, and contemporary cultural processes: An introduction. Ethnos65:157-72.
21.
Ebin, V., and D.A. Swallow.1984. Proper study of mankind ... : Great Anthropological Collections in Cambridge. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology.
22.
Fuller, Nancy J.1992. The museum as a vehicle for community empowerment: The Ak-Chin Indian Community Ecomuseum project. In Museums and communities: The politics of public culture, ed. Ivan Karp, Christine Mullen Kreamer and Steven D. Lavine, 327-65. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
23.
Geismar, Haidy.2004. The materiality of contemporary art in Vanatu. Journal of Material Culture9:43-58.
24.
Goody, Jack, and Ian Watt.1963. The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and History5:304-45.
25.
Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson.1983. Ethnography: Principles in practice . New York: Tavistock Publishing .
26.
Hampton, Keith.2004. Networked sociability on-line, off-line. In The network society: A cross-cultural perspective, ed. Manuel Castells, 217-32. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
27.
Herle, Anita.2000. Torres Strait islanders: Stories from an exhibition. Ethnos65: 253-74.
28.
Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean.1992. Museums and the shaping of knowledge. London: Routledge.
29.
Hughes, Martin, and John Dallwitz.2007. Ara Irititja: Towards culturally appropriate IT best practice in remote indigenous Australia. In Information technology and indigenous people, ed. Laurel E. Dyson, Max Hendriks and Stephen Grant, 146-58. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
30.
Ingold, Tim.2007. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues14: 1-16.
31.
Impey, Oliver, and Arthur MacGregor .1985. The origins of museums: The cabinet of curiosities in sixteenth and seventeenth-century Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32.
Issac, Gwyneira.2005. Mediating knowledges: Zuni negotiations for a culturally relevant museum. Museum Anthropology28:3-18.
33.
Isaac, Gweniera.2007. Mediating knowledges: Origins of a Zuni tribal museum . Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
34.
Karp, Ivan, and Steven D. Lavine .1991. Exhibiting cultures: The poetics and politics of museum display. Washington, DC : Smithsonian Institution Press.
35.
Karp, Ivan, Christine Mullen Kreamer, and Steven D. Lavine .1992. Museums and communities: The politics of public culture. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
36.
Kavanaugh, Andrea L., and Scott J. Patterson .2001. The impact of community computer networks on social capital and community involvement. American Behavioral Scientist45:496-509.
37.
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara.1992. Objects of ethnography. In Destination culture: Tourism, museums, and heritage, ed. Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, 17-79. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
Kopytoff, Igor.1986. The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process . In The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective , ed. Arjun Appadurai, 64-94. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Kuhn, Thomas.1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
40.
Latour, Bruno.1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Law, John, and Annemarie Mol .2003. Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University. http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Mol-Situating-Technoscience.pdf (accessed September 26, 2007).
42.
Law, John, and Vicky Singleton .2003. Object lessons. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University. http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Singleton-Object-Lessons.pdf (accessed February 23, 2007).
43.
Liff, Sonia.2005. Local communities: Relationships between ‘‘real’’ and ‘‘virtual’’ social capital. In Communities and technologies 2005: Proceedings of the second Communities and Technologies Conference, Milan, ed. Peter Van Den Besselaar, Giorgio de Michelis , Jenny Preese and Carla Simone, 41-53. New York: Springer.
44.
Lord, Alfred B.1965. The singer of tales. New York: Athaneum.
45.
Macdonald, Sharon.1998a. Exhibitions of power and the power of exhibitions. In The politics of display: Museums, science, culture, ed. Sharon Macdonald, 1-24. New York: Routledge.
46.
Macdonald, Sharon.1998b. Supermarket science? Consumers and ‘‘the public understanding of science’’. In The politics of display: Museums, science, culture, ed. Sharon Macdonald, 118-38. New York: Routledge .
47.
Marshall, Yvonne.2002. What is community archaeology? World Archaeology34: 211-9.
48.
Marty, Paul F., W. Boyd Rayward, and Michael B. Twidale .2003. Museum informatics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology37: 259-94.
49.
Merriman, Nick.1989. Heritage from the other side of the glass case. Anthropology Today5:14-5.
50.
Mouffe, Chantal.1999. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Social Research66:745-58.
51.
Ong, Walter J.1982. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York: Routledge.
52.
Pearce, Susan.1992. Museums, objects, and collections: A cultural study. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
53.
Pea, Roy.2004. The social and technical dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences13:423-51.
54.
Peers, Laura, and Alison K. Brown .2003. Museums and source communities . New York: Routledge.
55.
Phillips, Ruth.2005. Re-placing objects: Historical practices for the second museum age. Canadian Historical Review85:83-110.
56.
Pigg, Kenneth E., and Laura Duffy Crank .2004. Building community social capital: The potential and promise of information and communications technologies . Journal of Community Informatics1:58-73.
57.
Pomian, Krzysztof.1990. Collectors and curiosities: Paris and Venice, 1500-1800 . Cambridge: Polity Press.
58.
Pratt, Mary Louise.1992. Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. New York: Routledge.
59.
Reibel, Daniel B.1997. Registration methods for the small museum. 3rd ed. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
60.
Robinson, Michael.1995. Shampoo archaeology: Towards a participatory action research approach in civil society. The Canadian Journal of Native StudiesXVI:125-38.
61.
Ross, Max.2004. Interpreting the new museology. Museum and Society2:84-103.
62.
Salazar, Juan Francisco.2003. Articulating an activist imaginary: Internet as counter public sphere in the Mapuche movement, 1997/2002. Media Information Australia incorporating Culture and Policy107:19-29.
63.
Seely Brown, John, and Paul Duguid.2000. The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
64.
Simpson, Moira.2001. Making representations: Museums in the post-colonial era. Rev. ed. New York: Routledge.
65.
Smith, Brian Cantwell.1998. On the origin of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
66.
SPECTRUM: The UK Museum Documentation Standard, Version 3.1. 2007. Cambridge, UK: Museum Documentation Association. http://www.collectionstrust.org.uk/spectrum . (accessed January 7, 2010).
67.
Spradley, James.1979. The ethnographic interview. San Diego : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
68.
Srinivasan, Ramesh.2006. Where community voice and information society intersect . The Information Society22:355-65.
69.
Srinivasan, Ramesh, and Jeffrey Huang.2005. Fluid ontologies for digital museums . International Journal of Digital Libraries5:193-204.
70.
Srinivasan, Ramesh, Jim Enote, Katherine M. Becvar, and Robin Boast.2009. Critical and reflective uses of new media technologies in tribal museums. Museum Management and Curatorship24:169-89.
71.
Srinivasan, Ramesh, Robin Boast, Jonathan Furner, and Katherine M. Becvar . Forthcoming. Digital museums and diverse cultural knowledges: Moving past the traditional catalog. The Information Society. 25(4): 265-278.
72.
Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer .1989. Institutional ecology, ‘‘translations’’, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science19:387-420.
73.
Taborsky, Edwina.1990. The discursive object. In Objects of knowledge: New research in museum studies, ed. Susan Pearce, 50-77. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Athlone Press.
74.
Tuhiwai Smith, Linda.1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples . New York: Zed Books.
75.
Turnbull, David.2000. Masons, tricksters, and cartographers: Makers of knowledge and space. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic .
76.
Turnbull, David.2005. Messy assemblages, emergent protocols, and emergent knowledges: Complex adaptive Systems and the possibilities of sustaining Multiple ontologies and the cultural commons in new ways of assembling and creating knowledge . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S), Pasadena, CA.
