This article critically engages with the influential theory of ‘‘molecularized biopower’’ and ‘‘politics of life’’ developed by Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose. Molecularization is assumed to signal the end of population-centred biopolitics and the disciplining of subjects as described by Foucault, and the rise of new forms of biosociality and biological citizenship. Drawing on empirical work in Science and Technology Studies (STS), we argue that this account is limited by a focus on novelty and assumptions about the transformative power of the genetic life sciences. We suggest that biopower consists of a more complex cluster of relationships between the molecular and the population. The biological existence of different human beings is politicized through different complementary and competing discourses around medical therapies, choices at the beginning and end of life, public health, environment, migration and border controls, implying a multiple rather than a singular politics of life.
Agamben, G.1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2.
Andree, P.2002. The biopolitics of genetically modified organisms in Canada . Journal of Canadian Studies-Revue D Etudes Canadiennes37 (3):162-91.
3.
Amoore, L.2006. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography25 (3):336-51.
4.
Bates, B.2005. Care of the self and patient participation in genetic discourse: A Foucauldian reading of the surgeon general’s ‘‘My Family Health Portrait’’ program. Journal of Genetic Counseling14 (6):423-34.
5.
Bowker, G.C., and S.L. Star.1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. London: MIT Press .
6.
Braun, B.2007. Biopolitics and the molecularization of life. Cultural Geographies14 (1):6-28.
7.
Brodwin, P.2005. Genetic knowledge and collective identity. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry29 (2):139-43.
8.
Busby, H., and P. Martin.2006. Biobanks, national identity and imagined communities: The case of UK biobank. Science as Culture15 (3):237-51.
9.
Coker, R.2004. Compulsory screening of immigrants for tuberculosis and HIV. British Medical Journal28 (7435):298-300.
10.
Coors, M.2003. A Foucauldian foray into the new genetics. Journal of Medical Humanities24 (3):279-89.
11.
David, M.2005. Science in society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
Dean, M.1999. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE.
13.
Department of Health.2007. Review of parts II, V and VI of the public health (control of disease) act 1984: A consultation. London: HMSO .
14.
Epstein, S.1996. Impure science: AIDS activism and the politics of knowledge . Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Epstein, S.2007. Inclusion: The politics of difference in medical research . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Flower, M.J., and Heath, D.1993. Micro-anatomo politics: Mapping the Human Genome Project. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry17 (1):27-41.
17.
Foucault, M.1978. The history of sexuality volume I. New York: Pantheon.
18.
---. 2003a. The birth of biopolitics. In The essential Foucault: Selections from the essential works of Foucault 1954-1984, ed. P. Rabinow and N. Rose, pp. 202-207. New York: New Press .
19.
---. 2003b. Society must be defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975-1976. New York: Picador .
20.
Friedman, D.J., B.B. Cohen, A.R. Averbach, and J.M. Norton.2000. Race/ ethnicity and OMB Directive 15: Implications for state public health practice. American Journal of Public Health90 (11):1714-9.
21.
Ganchoff, C.2004. Regenerating movements: Embryonic stem cells and the politics of potentiality. Sociology of Health & Illness26 (6):757-74.
22.
Hallowell, N.1999. Doing the right thing: Genetic risk and responsibility . In Sociological perspectives on the new genetics, ed. P. Conrad and J. Gabe, 97-120. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
Hardt, M., and A. Negri.2001. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Hobson-West, P.2005. Understanding resistance to childhood vaccination in the UK: Radicals, reformists and the discourses of risk, trust and science. PhD Diss., University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
25.
---. 2007. Trusting blindly can be the biggest risk of all: Organised resistance to childhood vaccination in the UK. Sociology of Health & Illness29 (2):198-215.
26.
Kaufman, S.R., and L.M. Morgan.2005. The anthropology of the beginnings and ends of life. Annual Review of Anthropology34:317-41.
27.
Kay, L.1993. The molecular vision of life: Caltech, the Rockefeller foundation and the rise of the new biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
Kent, J., A. Faulkner, I. Geesink, and D. Fitzpatrick.2006. Culturing cells, reproducing and regulating the self. Body & Society12 (2):1-23.
29.
Kerr, A.2003. Rights and responsibilities in the new genetics era. Critical Social Policy23 (2):208-26.
30.
King, N.2002. Security, disease, commerce. Social Studies of Science32 (5-6):763-89.
31.
Koch, L.2004. The meaning of eugenics: Reflections on the government of genetic knowledge in the past and the present. Science in Context17 (3):315-31.
32.
Krones, T., E. Schluter, K. Manolopoulos, K. Bock, H.R. Tinneberg, M.C. Koch, M. Lindner, G.F. Hoffmann, E. Mayatepek, G. Huels, E. Neuwohner, S. El Ansari, T. Wissner, and G. Richter.2005. Public, expert and patients’ opinions on preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in Germany. Reproductive Biomedicine Online10 (1):116-23.
Leach, M.2005. MMR mobilisation: Citizens and science in a British vaccine controversy. Working Paper 247, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton: Sussex, http://www.ntd.co.uk/idsbookshop/details.asp?id=876 (Accessed 18 August 2009).
35.
Lemke, T.2004. Disposition and determinism-Genetic diagnostics in risk society. The Sociological Review52 (4):550-66.
36.
Nightingale, P., and P. Martin.2004. The myth of the biotechnology revolution . Trends in Biotechnology22 (11):564-9.
37.
Petersen, A., and R. Bunton.2002. The new genetics and the public’s health. London: Routledge.
38.
Petersen, A., and D. Lupton.1996. The new public health. London: SAGE.
39.
Plows, A., and P. Boddington.2006. Troubles with biocitizenship? Genomics , Society and Policy2 (3):115-35.
40.
Polzer, J., S.L. Mercer, and V. Goel.2002. Blood is thicker than water: Genetic testing as citizenship through familial obligation and the management of risk . Critical Public Health12 (2):153-68.
41.
Porter, D.1999. Health, civilization and the state. London: Routledge.
42.
Rabinow, P.1996. Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43.
---. 1999. French DNA: Trouble in purgatory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Rabinow, P., and N. Rose.2003. Foucault today. In The essential Foucault: Selections from the essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 , ed. P. Rabinow and N. Rose, vii-xxxv. New York: New Press.
Risch, N., E. Burchard, E. Ziv, and H. Tang.2002. Categorization of humans in biomedical research: Genes, race and disease. Genome Biology3 (7):1-12.
47.
Rock, M.2003. Death, taxes, public opinion, and the midas touch of Mary Tyler Moore: Accounting for promises by politicians to help avert and control diabetes. Medical Anthropology Quarterly17 (2):200-32.
48.
Rose, N.2001. The politics of life itself. Theory Culture & Society18 (6):1-30. ---. 2006. The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
49.
Rose, N., and C. Novas.2004. Biological citizenship. In Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems , ed. O. Aihwa and S. J. Collier, 439-63. Oxford: Blackwell.
50.
Scheper-Hughes, N.2004. Parts unknown: Undercover ethnography of the organs-trafficking underworld. Ethnography5 (1):29-73.
51.
Shakespeare, T.1998. Choices and Rights: Eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Disability and Society13 (5):665-81.
52.
Shostak, S.2005. The emergence of toxicogenomics: A case study of molecularization . Social Studies of Science35 (3):367-403.
53.
Skinner, D.2006. Racialised futures: Biologism and the changing politics of identity. Social Studies of Science36 (3):459-88.
54.
Smart, A., R. Tutton, P. Martin, G.T.H. Ellison, and R. Ashcroft.2008. The standardization of race and ethnicity in biomedical science editorials and UK biobanks. Social Studies of Science38 (3):407-23.
55.
Tutton, R., A. Kerr, and S. Cunningham-Burley .2005. Myriad stories: Constructing expertise and citizenship in discussions of the new genetics. In Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement, ed. M. Leach, I. Scoones and B. Wynne, 101-12. London : Zed Books.
56.
Waldby, C., and R. Mitchell.2006. Tissue economies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
57.
Watson-Verran, H., and D. Turnbull.1995. Science and other indigenous knowledge . In Handbook of science and technology studies, ed. S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, T. Pinch and J. Petersen , 115-39. London: SAGE.
58.
Weait, M.2007. Intimacy and Responsibility: the criminalisation of HIV transmission. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish .
59.
Weiner, C.2006. Patient and professional constructions of familial hypercholesterolaemia and heart disease: Testing the limits of the geneticisation thesisPhD Diss., University of Nottingham, Notingham. http://etheses.nottingham.ac.uk/archive/00000190/01/Weiner_PhD_thesis.pdf . Accessed August 18, 2009.
60.
Yearley, S.2005. Making sense of science. London: SAGE.
