Environmental controversies are often framed as conflicts between environmentalist and antienvironmentalist positions. The underlying dimensions of ethics and justice tend to be overlooked. This article seeks to integrate insights from environmental ethics and sociological observations through a case study of a watershed conflict. A controversy emerged in the 1990s when residents of the New York City (NYC) watershed filed a lawsuit to block NYC’s proposed regulations for the land surrounding the streams and reservoirs that supply NYC’s drinking water. The conflict was resolved after NYC agreed to provide economic development funds to the watershed towns in exchange for accepting the regulations. An analysis of interviews with NYC watershed town supervisors reveals that the conflict was resolved because underlying competing theories of justice were addressed. This contradicts the popular narrative that an environmental conflict can be resolved when competing parties come to the realization that natural ecosystems provide valuable water-purification services.
Amy, D.J.1987. The politics of environmental mediation. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
2.
Blake, N.M.1956. Water for the cities. Syracuse: Syracuse Univ. Press.
3.
Busch, L.2000. The eclipse of morality: Science, state, and market. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
4.
Catskill Watershed Corporation (CWC).1999 . West of Hudson economic development study for the Catskill watershed corporation: Draft final plan for the Catskill fund for the future . May 12. Margaretville, New York .
5.
Chichilnisky, G., and G. Heal.1998. Economic returns from the biosphere . Nature391(6668):629-30.
6.
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST).2005. Issue Paper: Agricultural Ethics. November (29):1-12.
7.
Dryzek, J.S.2005. The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
8.
Editorial.1996. A watershed agreement. New York Times. September 11, A1.
9.
Finnegan, M.C.1997. New York City’s watershed agreement: A lesson in sharing responsibility. Pace Environmental Law Review14:577-644.
10.
Gandy, M.2004. Rethinking urban metabolism: Water, space and the modern city. City8(3):363-79.
11.
---. 2002. Concrete and clay: Reworking nature in New York City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12.
General Accounting Office (GAO).1994. Drinking water: Stronger efforts essential for small communities to comply with standards. Washington, DC: GAO/RCED-94-40.
13.
Glenna, L.L.1999. Systemic constraints to ecological well-being: The case of the 1985 food security act. Rural Sociology64(1):133-57.
14.
Habermas, J.1970. Toward a rational society: Student protest, science, and politics. Trans. J. J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
15.
Hajer, M.A.1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
16.
Kline, B.2007. First along the river: A brief history of the U.S. environmental movement. Lanham, MA: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
17.
National Research Council (NRC).2000. Watershed management for potable water supply: Assessing New York City’s approach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18.
Nelkin, D.1979. Controversy: Politics of technical decisions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYC DEP).1993a. Draft generic environmental impact statement for the draft watershed regulations for the protection from contamination, degradation, and pollution of the New York City water supply and its sources .
20.
---. 1993b. Watershed protection through whole community planning: A charter for watershed partnership. Ithaca: New York State Water Resources Institute, Center for the Environment, Cornell University.
21.
---. 1997. New York City watershed memorandum of agreement. New York: New York City Department of Environmental Protection.
22.
New York State Water Resources Institute (NYS WRI).1994. Chronology of whole community planning for the NYC watershed . Unpublished manuscript.
23.
Perrin, N.1963. New York drowns another valley. Harper’s . August, 76-83.
24.
Pfeffer, M.J., and J.M. Stycos.1998. Does demographic knowledge matter? Results of a poll in the New York City watershed. Population Policy Review17(4):389-402.
25.
Pfeffer, M.J., and L.P. Wagenet.1999. Planning for environmental responsibility and equity: A critical appraisal of rural/urban relations in the New York City watershed, pp. 179-206. In Contested countryside: The rural urban fringe of North America, ed. M. B. Lapping and O. Furuseth.Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
26.
Popovic, N.A.F.1993. The right to participate in decisions that affect the environment. Pace Environmental Law Review10(2):683-709.
27.
Randolph, J.2004. Environmental land use planning and management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28.
Revkin, A.C.1997. Billion-dollar plan to clean New York City water at its source. New York Times, August, 1, 28-29.
29.
Rikoon, J.S., and T.L. Goedeke.2000. Anti-environmentalism and citizen opposition to the Ozark man and the biosphere reserve. Lewiston, NY : Edwin Mellen Press.
30.
Sagoff, M.2002. On the value of natural ecosystems: The catskills parable . Philosophy & Public Policy Quarterly22(1/2):10-6.
31.
Schneeweiss, J.1997. Watershed protection strategies: A case study of the New York City watershed in light of the 1996 amendments to the safe drinking water act. Villanova Environmental Law Journal8:77-119.
32.
Selznick, P.1984. TVA and the grassroots: A study of politics and organization . Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
33.
Stake, R.E.2000. Case studies. In Handbook of qualitative research, eds., N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 435-54. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Walton, J.1992. Western times and water wars: State, culture, and rebellion in California. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
36.
Weidner, C.H.1974. Water for a city: A history of New York City’s problem from the beginning to the Delaware River system. New Brunswick : Rutgers Univ. Press.
37.
Wilshusen, P.R., S.R. Brechin, C.L. Fortwangler, and P.C. West.2003. Contested nature: Conservation and development at the turn of the twenty-first century. In Contested nature: Promoting international biodiversity with social justice in the twenty-first century, eds., S. R. Brechin, P. R. Wilshusen, C. L. Fortwangler , and P. C. West, 1-22. Albany, NY: State Univ. of New York Press.
38.
Yearley, S.1996. Sociology, environmentalism, globalization: Reinventing the globe. London: Sage.
