This paper explores the process of technological innovation from a geographical perspective. Some explanations of technological change concentrate on the development of technology itself - in which makers play a central role, while other explanations focus more on consumption and the users of technology. In this paper, discussion will focus on interactions between makers and users, and on the particular places in which such interactions occur. It is proposed that these interactions, especially during the early phase of rapid product development, produce creative spaces. An adaptation of the social construction of technology (SCOT) model is therefore proposed which stresses the geographical settings in which rapid innovation occurs, and therefore is called geographical construction of technology (G-COT). The G-COT model is illustrated by the case of the Coventry bicycle industry from its foundation in 1869 to 1880 when this town had become the world's largest center of bicycle production.
Anon.1883. A short biographical sketch of the life and inventions of the late Mr. James Starley. Supplement to the Cyclist24 (January): 1-8.
2.
Bartleet, H.W.1931. Bartleet's bicycle book. London : Burrow.
3.
Baudrillard, J.1998. The consumer society: Myths and structures. London: Sage Publications.
4.
Bijker, W.1995. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Towards a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Bowker, G., and S. Starr.1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Bury, V., and G.L. Hillier.1887. Cycling. London : Longmans, Green.
7.
Castells, M., and P. Hall.1994. Technopoles of the world: The making of twenty-first-century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.
8.
Cooke, P., and K. Morgan.1998. The associational economy: Firms, regions and innovation. Oxford: OUP.
9.
Eberts, D., and G. Norcliffe.1998. New forms of artisanal production in Toronto's computer animation industry. Geographische Zeitschrift86(2): 120-33.
10.
Epperson, B.2002. Does SCOT answer? A comment. Technology and Culture43 (1): 371-3.
11.
---. 2005. The monopoly machine: The Lallement patent and the attempted monopolization of the American bicycle industry, 1880-1886. In Cycle history 15: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Cycle History Conference, ed. Rob Van der Plas, 102-21. San Francisco: Cycle Publishing.
12.
Feldman, M.2000. Location and Innovation: The new economic geography of innovation, spillovers, and agglomeration. In The Oxford handbook of economic geography, ed. G. L. Clark , M. P. Feldman, and M. S. Gertler.Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
Florida, R.2004. The rise of the creative class and how its transforming work leisure community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
14.
Gieryn, T.F.1998. Biotechnology's private parts (and some public ones too) . In Private science: Biotechnology and the rise of the molecular sciences, ed. A. Thackray , 219-53. Philadelphia : Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
15.
Golinski, J.1998. Making natural knowledge: Constructivism and the history of science. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
16.
Granovetter, M.1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness . American Journal of Sociology91 (3): 481-510.
17.
Harrison, A.E.1977. Growth, entrepreneurship and capital formation in the United Kingdom's cycle and related industries. PhD thesis, Univ. of York.
18.
Harrison, B.1994. Lean and mean: The changing landscape of corporate power in the age of flexibility. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Harvey, D.2003. Paris, capital of modernity. London : Routledge.
20.
Hsu, J.-Y.2004. The evolving institutional embeddedness of a late-industrial district in Taiwan. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie95 (2): 218-32.
21.
Hsu, J.-Y., and A. Saxenian.2001. The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: Technical communities and industrial upgrading. Industrial and Corporate Change10 (4): 893-920.
22.
Kline, R.R.1995. Constructing technology as `applied science': Public Rhetoric of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1880-1945. Isis86 (2): 194-221.
23.
Latour, B.1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open Univ. Press.
24.
Lefebvre, H.1991. The production of space. Oxford : Blackwell.
25.
Livingstone, D. N. 2003. Putting science in its place. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Marshall, A. 1919. Elements of economics of industry. London: Macmillan.
26.
Martin, R.2000. Institutional approaches in economic geography. In. A companion to economic geography, eds. E. Sheppard , and T. Barnes, 77-94. Oxford : Blackwell.
27.
Merrifield, A.2006. Henri Lefebvre: A critical introduction. New York: Routledge.
28.
Millward, A.1993. The Genesis of the British Cycle Industry 1867-1872 . Proceedings of the First International Conference of Cycling History . Glasgow: Private publication: 59-78.
29.
Murdoch, J.1995. Actor networks and the evolution of economic forms: Combining description and explanation in theories of regulation, flexible specialization, and networks. Environment and Planning A27(5): 731-57.
30.
---. 1998. The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum29 (4): 357-74.
31.
Norcliffe, G.1999. Embedded innovation: Canadian bicycle-related patents 1868-1900. In Cycle history: Proceedings of the Ninth International Cycle History Conference, eds. G. Norcliffe , and R. Van der Plas, 9-20. San Francisco : Van der Plas Publications.
32.
---. 2001. The ride to modernity: The bicycle in Canada, 1869-1900 . Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press .
33.
---. 2005. The rise of the Coventry bicycle industry, and the geographical construction of technology. In Cycle history 15: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Cycle History Conference, ed. R. Van der Plas, 41-58. San Francisco: Cycle Publishing.
34.
---. 2006. Associations, modernity, and the insider-citizens of a Victorian highwheel bicycle club. Journal of Historical Sociology19 (2): 121-50.
35.
O'Brien, R.1991. Global financial integration: The end of geography . New York: Council on Foreign relations Press.
Ophir, A., and S. Shapin.1991. The place of knowledge: A methodological survey. Science in Context4 (1): 3-21.
38.
Oudshoorn, N., and T. Pinch.2003. How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
Pinch, T., and W. Bijker.1984. The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science14(3): 399-441.
40.
Pinkerton, J., and D. Roberts.1998. A history of Rover cycles. Birmingham, UK: Pinkerton Press.
41.
Piore, M., and C. Sabel.1984. The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Platt, H.L.2005. Shock cities. The environmental transformation and reform of Manchester and Chicago. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
43.
Pratt, C.E.1879. The American bicycler: A manual for the observer, the learner, and the expert. Boston: Rockwell and Churchill.
44.
Prest, J.1960. The industrial revolution in Coventry. Oxford: OUP.
45.
Putnam, R.1993. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life . The American Prospect13 (Spring): 35-42.
46.
Rigby, D.2000. Geography and technological change. In A companion to economic geography. ed. E. Sheppard, and T. J. Barnes, 202-23. Oxford : Blackwell.
47.
Ritchie, A.1997. The origins of bicycle racing in England. In Cycle history 7: Proceedings of the Seventh International Cycle History Conference, ed. R. van der Plas , 43-56. San Francisco: Cycle Publishing.
48.
---. 2007. The origins of bicycle racing in England: Technology, entertainment, sponsorship and publicity. Birmingham: John Pinkerton Memorial Publishing Fund.
49.
Roberts, D.2002. Comment sheet on `Wheels Within Wheels' by GeoffreyWilliamson. Mitcham, Surrey, UK: Reproduced by the author.
50.
Rosen, P.2002. Framing production: Technology, culture and change in the British bicycle industry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
Saxenian, A.1996. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route, 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
52.
Schama, S.2002. A history of Britain: Vol 3: The fate of the empire 1776-2000 . New York: Hyperion.
53.
Schofield, R.E.1963. The Lunar Society of Birmingham: A social of provincial science and industry in eighteenth-century England. Oxford : Clarendon.
54.
Shapin, S.1988. The house of experiment in seventeenth-century England . Isis79 (3): 373-404.
55.
---. 1994. A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth England. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
56.
Smith, R.G.2003. World city actor-networks. Progress in Human Geography27(1): 25-44.
57.
Starley, W.1902. The life and times of James Starley. London: Private publication.
58.
Stockdale, G., and N. Clayton.1984. An index of makes and makers of ordinary bicycles. Leominster: Orphans Press .
59.
Storper, M.1997. The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford .
60.
Sturmey, H.1878. The "indispensable″ bicyclist's handbook and guide to bicycling. Weymouth: H. A. Judd .
61.
Walden, K.1997. Becoming modern in Toronto. Toronto : Univ. of Toronto Press.
62.
Williamson, G.1966. Wheels within wheels: The story of the Starleys of Coventry . London: Geoffrey Bles .
