Bijker calls for scholars in science and technology studies (STS) to become public intellectuals by actively working toward “democratizing . . . technological culture.” Many STS scholars have developed practices that support democratic and public activity; yet, these typically require individual commitment with inadequate institutional support. The public work of STS scholars can be better supported through a program that includes (1) using specialist research in nonreproductive educational contexts, (2) redefining and revaluing academic service, (3) developing more accessible ways of writing, and (4) publishing and valuing STS-based texts that circulate among nonacademic audiences.
Barnett, R.2005. Academics as intellectuals. In The changing role of the public intellectual, edited by D. Cummings, 108-22. London: Routledge .
2.
Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash.1994. Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge , UK: Polity.
3.
Beck-Gernsheim, E.1995. Life as a planning project. In Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology, edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynski , and B. Wynne, 139-53. London : Sage.
4.
Bender, T.1993. Intellect and public life: Essays on the social history of academic intellectuals in the United States. Baltimore , MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
Bijker, W.2003. The need for public intellectuals: A space for STS. Science, Technology, & Human Values28 (4): 443-50.
6.
Brouwer, D., and C. Squires.2003. Public intellectuals, public life, and the university. Argumentation and Advocacy39 (3): 201-13.
7.
Brown, A.2004. Writing crossover books: Can scholarship sell?The Academic Exchange, December/January. http://www.emory.edu/ACAD_EXCHANGE/ (accessed on January 9, 2004).
8.
Brunner, R., C. Colburn, C. Cromley, R. Klein, and E. Olson.2002. Finding common ground: Governance and natural resources in the American West. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Brym, R., and J. Myles.1989. Social science intellectuals and public issues in English Canada. University of Toronto Quarterly58 (4): 442-51.
10.
Clifford, J., and G. Marcus. eds. 1986. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Cooper, M.1996. Environmental rhetoric in the age of hegemonic politics: Earth First! and the Nature Conservancy. In Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America, edited by C. Herndl and S. Brown , 236-60. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press .
12.
Crick, N.2006. Rhetoric, philosophy, and the public intellectual . Philosophy and Rhetoric39 (2): 127-39.
Eder, K.1996. The institutionalisation of environmentalism: Ecological discourse and the second transformation of the public sphere. In Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology, edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynski , and B. Wynne, 203-23. London : Sage.
15.
Epstein, S.1996. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge . Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Eubanks, V.2006. Technologies of citizenship: Surveillance and political learning in the welfare system. In Surveillance and security: Technological politics in everyday life, edited by T. Monahan, 89-107. New York: Routledge .
17.
Faubion, J.1999. Figuring David Koresh. In Critical anthropology now, edited by G. Marcus, 89-122. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
18.
Fausto-Sterling, A.2000. Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books .
19.
Fischer, M.2000. Calling the future(s) with ethnographic and historiographic legacy disciplines: STS@the_Turn_[ ]000.mit.edu. In Zeroing in on the year 2000, edited by G. Marcus, 218-302. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
20.
Forsythe, D.2001. Ethics and politics of studying up in technoscience . In Studying those who study us, edited by D. Hess, 119-31. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
Fortun, K.2001. Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, disaster, new global orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Fuller, S.2000. The governance of science. Buckingham , UK: Open University Press.
23.
---. 2006. The public intellectual as an agent of justice: In search of a regime. Philosophy and Rhetoric39 (2): 147-56.
24.
Gattone, C.2006. The social scientist as public intellectual: Critical reflections in a changing world. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
Genus, A., and T. Rogers-Hayden .2005. Genetic engineering in Aotearoa, New Zealand: A case of opening up or closing down debate? In Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement, edited by M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne, 244-48. London : Zed Books.
26.
Gusfield, J.1994. The reflexivity of social movements: Collective behavior and mass society theory revisited. In New social movements: From ideology to identity, edited by E. Laraña , H. Johnston, and J. Gusfield, 58-78. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
27.
Haines, H.1984. Black radicalization and the funding of civil rights: 1957-1970. Social Problems32 (1): 31-43.
28.
Hajer, M.1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
29.
Hammersley, M.2002. Should social science be critical?Philosophy of the Social Sciences35 (2): 175-95.
Hess, D.2004. Medical modernisation, scientific research fields and the epistemic politics of health social movements. Sociology of Health & Illness26 (6): 695-709.
32.
Irwin, A., and B. Wynne. eds. 1996. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Killingsworth, M., and J. Palmer.1992. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
34.
Kloppenburg, J.2005. First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology , 2nd ed. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press.
35.
Latour, B.2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry30 (2): 225-48.
36.
Leach, M., and I. Scoones.2005. Science and citizenship in a global context. In Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement, edited by M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne , 15-38. London: Zed Books.
37.
Leach, M., I. Scoones , and B. Wynne. eds. 2005. Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement. London: Zed Books .
38.
Lewicki, R., B. Gray , and M. Elliott, eds. 2003. Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.
39.
Marcus, G., ed. 1999. Critical anthropology now: Unexpected contexts, shifting constituencies, changing agendas . Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
40.
Martin, B.1996. Sticking a needle into science: The case of polio vaccines and the origin of AIDS. Social Studies of Science26 (2): 245-76.
41.
---. 1997. Science, technology and nonviolent action: The case for a utopian dimension in the social analysis of science and technology. Social Studies of Science27 (3): 439-63.
42.
Melucci, A.1989. Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
43.
Ortner, S.1999. Generation X: Anthropology in a media-saturated world . In Critical anthropology now, edited by G. Marcus, 55-88. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
44.
Peterson, T.1997. Sharing the earth: The rhetoric of sustainable development . Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
45.
Posner, R.2001. Public intellectuals: A study of decline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
46.
Prelli, L.2004. Topical analysis and the problem of judgment in environmental disputes: The case of sustainable forestry in New Hampshire . In Green talk in the White House: The rhetorical presidency encounters ecology , edited by T. Peterson , 233-57. College Station, TX: A&M University Press.
47.
Rayner, S.2003. Who's in charge? Worldwide displacement of democratic judgment by expert assessments. Economic and Political Weekly , 38 (48): 5113-119.
48.
Richards, E.1996. (Un)boxing the monster. Social Studies of Science26 (2): 323-56.
49.
Roe, E.1994. Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice . Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
50.
Said, E.2002. The public role of writers and intellectuals. In The public intellectual, edited by H. Small, 19-39. Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
51.
Sayre, N.2002. Ranching, endangered species, and urbanization in the Southwest: Species of capital. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
52.
Sclove, R.1995. Democracy and technology. New York : Guilford.
53.
Sheridan, T.1995. Arizona: A history. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
54.
Small, H.2002. Introduction. In The public intellectual , edited by H. Small, 1-18. Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
55.
Stacey, J.1999. Virtual social science and the politics of family values . In Critical anthropology now, edited by G. Marcus, 29-54. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
56.
Stevens, S.2006. Activist rhetorics and the struggle for meaning: The case of "sustainability" in the reticulate public sphere. Rhetoric Review25 (3): 297-315.
57.
---. 2007. A place for dialogue: Language, land use, and politics in southern Arizona. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
58.
Visvanathan, S.2005. Knowledge, justice and democracy. In Science and Citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement, edited by M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne, 83-94. London : Zed Books.
59.
Wachelder, J.2003. Democratizing science: Various routes and visions of Dutch science shops. Science, Technology, & Human Values28 (2): 244-73.
60.
Waddell, C.2000. Defining sustainable development: A case study in environmental communication. In Technical communication, deliberative rhetoric, and environmental discourse: Connections and directions , edited by N. Coppola and B. Karis , 3-20. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
61.
Weber, E.2003. Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62.
Willinsky, J. n.d. How to be more of a public intellectual by making your intellectual work more public. http://pkp.sfu.ca/ (accessed in June 2007).
63.
Woodhouse, E., D. Hess, S. Breyman, and B. Martin.2002. Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science32 (2): 297-319.
64.
Wynne, B.1996. SSK's identity parade: Signing-up, off-and-on. Social Studies of Science26 (2): 357-391.
