Political responses to metropolitan growth in the United States and elsewhere should include careful ethical deliberation, but ethical judgment and action are limited by the involvement of individual moral agents in the complex processes that give shape to the built environment. I propose that casting the built environment as a heterogeneous sociotechnical ensemble can provide useful insight into the limits of ethics, particularly through the concept of obduracy. To the extent components of an ensemble are obdurate, they can stop or deflect even well-considered actions even as they impose constraints on moral agency itself. From this possibility spring a number of worthwhile lines of inquiry at the confluence of ethics and technology studies.
Aibar, Eduardo, and Wiebe E. Bijker .1997. Constructing a city: The Cerdà plan for the extension of Barcelona. Science, Technology, & Human Values22 (1): 3-30.
2.
Akrich, Madeleine.1992. The de-scription of technical objects. In Shaping technology/building society, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 205-24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Bijker, Wiebe E.1995a. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
---. 1995b. Sociohistorical technology studies. In Handbook of science and technology studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. Pinch, 229-56. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Callon, Michel.1987. Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, edited by W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 83-103. Cambridge : MIT Press.
6.
Chaskin, Robert J.2005. Democracy and Bureaucracy in a community planning process . Journal of Planning Education and Research24: 408-19.
7.
Congress for the New Urbanism.2001. Charter of the New Urbanism [PDF]. http://www.cnu.org/cnu_reports/Charter.pdf (accessed on October 16, 2005).
8.
Cowan, Ruth Schwartz.1987. The consumption junction: A proposal for research strategies in the sociology of technology. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology , edited by W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 261-80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Duany, Andres, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck.2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point.
10.
Ellis, Cliff.2002. The New Urbanism: Critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design7 (3): 261-91.
11.
Ellul, Jacques.1964. The technological society. Trans. J. Wilkinson. New York: Knopf.
12.
Ferguson, Erik.2004. Zoning for parking as policy process: A historical review . Transport Reviews24 (2): 177-94.
13.
Fishman, Robert.1987. Bourgeois utopias: The rise and fall of suburbia. New York: Basic Books.
14.
Garreau, Joel.1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Anchor.
15.
Graham, Stephen.2001. The city as sociotechnical process: Networked mobilities and urban social inequalities. City5 (3): 339-49.
16.
Hommels, Anique.2000. Obduracy and urban sociotechnical change: Changing plan Hoog Catharijne. Urban Affairs Review35 (5): 649-76.
17.
---. 2005. Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values30 (3): 323-51.
18.
Hughes, Thomas P.1986. The seamless web: Technology, science, etcetera, etcetera . Social Studies of Science16 (2): 281-92.
19.
---. 1994. Technological momentum. In Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism, edited by M. R. Smith and L. Marx, 101-13. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Innes, Judith E., and Judith Gruber.2005. Planning styles in conflict: The metropolitan transportation commission. Journal of the American Planning Association71: 177-88.
21.
Joerges, Bernward.1999. Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science29 (3): 411-31.
22.
Keulartz, Jozef, Maartje Schermer, Michiel Korthals, and Swierstra Tsjalling .2004. Ethics in technological culture: A programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach. Science, Technology, & Human Values29 (1): 3-29.
23.
Kirkman, Robert.2004a. The ethics of metropolitan growth: A framework. Philosophy & Geography7 (2): 201-18.
24.
---. 2004b. Reasons to dwell on (if not necessarily in) the suburbs . Environmental Ethics26 (1): 77-95.
25.
---. Forthcoming. Failures of imagination: Stuck and out of luck in metropolitan America. Ethics, Place and Environment.
26.
Konvitz, Josef W., Mark H. Rose, and Joel A. Tarr .1990. Technology and the city. Technology and Culture31 (2): 284-94.
27.
Kunstler, James Howard.1994. The geography of nowhere: The rise and decline of America's man-made landscape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
28.
Latour, Bruno.1992. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 225-58. Cambridge : MA: MIT Press.
29.
Law, John, and Michel Callon.1992. The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In Shaping technology/building society, edited by J. Law and W. E. Bijker, 21-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
Marcuse, Peter.2000. The New Urbanism: The dangers so far. DISP140:4-6.
31.
Myers, Dowell, and Tridib Banerjee .2005. Toward greater heights for planning: Reconciling the differences between profession, practice, and academic field. Journal of the American Planning Association71 (2): 121-29.
32.
Norton, Bryan G.2003. Searching for sustainability: Interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology, ed. M. Ruse.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Oudshoorn, Nelly, and Trevor Pinch.2003. Introduction: How users and non-users matter. In How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies, edited by N. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, 1-25. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker .1987. The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit one another. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology , edited by W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 17-50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
Russell, Stewart.1986. The social construction of artefacts: A response to Pinch and Bijker. Social Studies of Science16 (2): 331-46.
36.
Sagoff, Mark.2003. At the shrine of Our Lady of Fàtima, or why political questions are not all economic. In The environmental ethics and policy book: Philosophy, ecology, economics, edited by D. VanDeVeer and C. Pierce , 327-35. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
37.
Sies, Mary Corbin.1987. The city transformed: Nature, technology, and the suburban ideal, 1877-1917. Journal of Urban History14 (1): 81-111.
38.
Stern, Robert A. M.1986. Pride of place: Building the American Dream. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; New York: American Heritage.
39.
Vogel, Steven.2003. The nature of artifacts. Environmental Ethics25 (2): 149-68.
40.
Warner, Sam Bass.1978. Streetcar suburbs: The process of growth in Boston (1870-1900) . 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Winner, Langdon.1977. Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
---. 1993. Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values18 (3): 362-78.
