This article explores processes of articulation in the controversies over third-generation mobile phone transmitters and the interrelated phenomenon of “electrosensitivity.” The argument is that the search to fix public image and public concerns tends to alienate the public from technology discussions. An alternative political epistemology of articulations is suggested to explore the dynamics among prereflexive motives, public engagement, and institutional requirements for public deliberations.
Archer, M.2000. Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Borraz, O., M. Devigne, and D. Salomon.2004. Controverses et mobilisations autour des antennes relais de téléphonie mobile. Final report, Convention d'études. English summary. Paris: CNRS-FNSP/SFR.
3.
Brante, T., and H. Norman.1995. Epidemisk masspsykos eller reell risk? En sociologisk studie av kontroversen kring elöverkänslighetStockholm: Symposion.
4.
Brown, M.B.2001. The civic shaping of technology: California's electric vehicle program. Science, Technology, & Human Values26 (1): 56-81.
5.
Brunsson, N.1995. Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. In Research in the sociology of organizations: Studies of organizations in the European tradition, vol. 13, ed. S. B. Bacharach , P. Gagliardi, and B. Mundell , 211-35. Greenwich, UK: JAI Press.
6.
———. 2006. Mechanisms of hope. Copenhagen : Business Press.
7.
Burgess, A.2004. Cellular phones, public fears and a culture of precaution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Callon, M., and V. Rabeharisoa.2004. Gino's lesson on humanity: Genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist's role. Economy and Society33 (1): 1-27.
9.
Castoriadis, C.1984. The sayable and the unsayable. In Crossroads in the labyrinth, ed. C. Castoriadis , 119-44. Brighton , UK: Harvester Press.
10.
Drake, F.2006. Mobile phone masts: Protesting the scientific evidence . Public Understanding of Science15 (4):387-410.
11.
Engdahl, E.2004. A theory of the emotional self: From the standpoint of a neo-median. PhD diss., Örebro University.
12.
European Communities (EC).1999a. 1999/519/EC: Council recommendation of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz). Official Journal of the European Communities42 (L199): 59-70.
13.
———. 1999b. Decision no. 128/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 1998 on the coordinated introduction of a third-generation mobile and wireless communications system (UMTS) in the community. Official Journal of the European Communities42 (L17): 1-7.
14.
Gould, D.B.2003. Passionate political processes: Bringing emotions back into the study of social movements. In Rethinking social movements: Structure, meaning and movements, ed. J. Goodwin and J. M. Jasper, 155-75. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
Hardell, L., K. Hansson Mild, and M. Carlberg.2003. Further aspects on cellular and cordless telephones and brain tumours. International Journal of Oncology22 (2): 399-407.
16.
Irwin, A.2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science10 (1): 1-18.
17.
Jacobs, L.R., and R.Y. Shapiro.2000. Politicians don't pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Jasanoff, S., and B. Wynne.1998. Science and decision-making. In The societal framework. Vol. 1 of Human choice and climate change , ed. S. Rayner and E. L. Malone, 1-87. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
19.
Joas, H.2003. Språk och artikulation. In Castoriadis. Vol. 58, Res publica: Östlings bokförlag Symposions teoretiska och litterära tidskrift , ed. Ingmar Karlsson, 54-66. Eslöv : Brutus Östlings bokförlag Symposion.
20.
Kbm.2004. Intervjuundersökning om oro för strålningsrisker med utbyggnaden av 3G och basstationer för mobiler . Stockholm: Swedish Emergency Management Agency.
21.
Latour, B.1991. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ———. 2004. How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society10 (2/3): 205-29.
22.
Lembke, J.2002. EU regulatory strategy for mobile Internet. Journal of European Public Policy9 (2): 273-91.
23.
Lezaun, J. and L. Soneryd.Forthcoming. Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science .
24.
Lidskog, R., and G. Sundqvist.2002. The role of science within environmental regimes: The case of LRTAP. European Journal of International Relations8 (1): 77-101.
25.
Mead, G.H.1926. The nature of aesthetic experience. International Journal of Ethics36 (4): 382-93.
26.
Messing, 2003. The government's perspective on the establishment of 3G. Lecture presented at Vad kan 3G användas till inom kommun och landsting? Stockholm, April 3.
27.
Michael, M.2002. Comprehension, apprehension, prehension: Heterogeneity and the public understanding of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values27 (3): 357-78.
28.
Milton, K.2002. Loving nature: Towards an ecology of emotion. London: Routledge.
29.
Mitchell, L.M., and A. Cambrosio.1997. The invisible topography of power: Electromagnetic fields, bodies and the environment. Social Studies of Science27 (2): 221-71.
30.
Persson, R.R.B., L.G. Salford, and A. Brun.1997. Blood-brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication. Wireless Networks3 (6): 455-61.
31.
Smelser, N.J.1998. The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences: 1997 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review63 (1): 1-16.
32.
Söderqvist, 2004. Utbyggnaden av tredje generationens mobiltelefoni—Ett potentiellt folkhälsoproblem ? Örebro, Sweden: Department of Health Science, Örebro University.
33.
Soneryd, L. Forthcoming. A traumatising transparency exercise on mobile phones and health. In Transparency in a new global order: Unveiling organizational visions, ed. C. Garsten and M. Lindh de Montoya.Chelstenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
34.
Star, S.L., and J.R. Griesemer.1989. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science19(3):387-420.
35.
Statens Strålskyddsinstitut (SSI).2002. Statens strålskyddsinstituts allmänna råd om begränsning av allmänhetens exponering för elektromagnetiska fält; beslutade den 28 oktober 2002. SSI FS2002:3. Stockholm.
36.
———. 2003a. Pressmeddelande 18 December 2003 Ny rapport om hälsorisker från mobiltelefoni. Stockholm.
37.
———. 2003b. Recent research on mobile telephony and cancer and other selected biological effects: First annual report from SSI's Independent Expert Group on Electromagnetic Fields. Dnr 00/1854/02. Stockholm .
38.
———. 2004. Frågor och svar om forskning och vetenskap: Hur tillämpar Sverige försiktighetsprincipen? Stockholm.
39.
Stilgoe, J.2004. Experts and anecdotes: Shaping the public science of mobile phone health risks. PhD diss., University College London .
40.
———. 2005. Controlling mobile phone health risks in the UK: A fragile discourse of compliance. Science and Public Policy32 (1): 55-64.
41.
———. 2007. The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks. Public Understanding of Science16 (1): 45-61.
42.
Svenska Dagbladet.2003. Rädsla för strålning hinder för 3G-master, February 28.
43.
Svenska UMTSnät. n.d. Basstationer för UMTS: Fakta och beskrivning. http://www.svenskaumts .se/files/EMF_policy.pdf (accessed December 27, 2006).
44.
Turner, B.1996. The body and society: Explorations in social theory . London: Sage.
45.
van der Sluijs, J., J. van Eijndhoven, S. Shackley, and B. Wynne.1998. Anchoring devices in science for policy: The case of consensus around climate sensitivity. Social Studies of Science28 (2): 291-323.
46.
World Health Organization (WHO).2004. EMF world wide standards database. http://www.who.int/docstore/peh-emf/EMFStandards/who-0102/Worldmap5.htm (accessed December 27, 2006).
47.
Wynne, B.2001. Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture10 (4): 445-81.
48.
———. Risk as globalizing “democratic” discourse? Framing subjects and citizens. In Science and citizens, ed. M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne, 66-82. New York: ZED Books.
