This article analyzes how the recent call for accounting in health care interferes with daily care practice and raises the question of how accounting practices relate to the aim of good care. The most influential accounting methods in the Netherlands suggest ways for professionals to legitimize their activities. The analysis of washing patients in long-term mental health care shows that different styles of accounting evaluate and legitimize care while structuring notions of what good care is. A specific style of accounting enforces certain values but does not tell about the tragic or unexpected effects that come with it, nor does it provide a repertoire to deal with these. Thus, care practices incorporating specific styles of accounting remain dependent on forms of care that are not accountable or ask for new forms of reflexivity.
Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 1994. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Berg, M.1997. Rationalizing medical work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Benner, P.1984. From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
4.
Bijsterveld, K.1996. Geen kwestie van leeftijd: Verzorgingsstaat, wetenschap en discussies rond ouderen in Nederland, 1945-1982 (Not a matter of age: The caring state, science, and discussions on the elderly in the Netherlands 1945-1982). Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
5.
Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 1991. De la justification: Les économies de la grandeur (On justification: The economies of grandeur). Paris: Editions Gallimard.
6.
Boschma, G. 1997. Creating nursing care for the mentally ill: Mental health nursing in Dutch asylums 1890-1920. PhD diss., Nursing University of Pennsylvania.
7.
Bulman, C., and S. En Schuts, eds. 2004. Reflective practice in nursing: The growth of the professional practitioner. 3rd ed.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
8.
Callon, M., and J. Law. 2005. On qualculation, agency and otherness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23 (5): 717-733.
9.
Chervenak, F. A., and L. B. McCullough. 1995. The threat of the new managed practice of medicine to patients’ autonomy. Journal of Clinical Ethics6 (4): 320-323.
10.
de Laet, M., and A. Mol. 2000. The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science30 (2): 225-263.
11.
de Lange, J.1990. Vergeten in het verpleeghuis (Forgotten in the nursing home). Utrecht, Netherlands: Trimbos-instituut.
12.
Ghaye, T., and S. Lillyman. 2000. Reflection: Principles and practice for healthcare professionals. Dinton, Wiltshire, UK: Quay Books, Mark Allen Pubs.
13.
Green, J.2000. Epistemology, evidence and experience: Evidence based health care in the work of accident alliances. Sociology of Health & Illness22 (4): 453-476.
14.
Haraway, D.1991. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
15.
Harbers, H., A. Mol, and A. Stollmeyer. 2002. Food matters: Arguments for an ethnography of daily care. Theory, Culture & Society19 (5-6): 207-226.
16.
Hopper, K.2001. Commentary: On the transformation of the moral economy of care. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry25 (4): 473-484.
17.
Kember, D., et al., eds. 2001. Reflective teaching and learning in the health professions. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
18.
Kirschner, S. R., and W. S. Lachicotte. 2001. Managing managed care: Habitus, hysteresis and the end(s) of psychotherapy. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry25 (4): 441-456.
19.
Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life and the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Latour, B.1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21.
Law, J., and A. Mol. 2002. Local entanglements or Utopian moves: An inquiry into train accidents. In Utopia and Organisation, ed. M. Parker, 82-105. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
MacIntyre, A.1984. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
23.
Mol, A.1998. Missing links, making links: The performance of some atherosclerosis. In Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques and bodies, edited by M. Berg and A. Mol, 144-165. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.
24.
Mol, A.2002. The body multiple: An ontology of medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25.
Mol, A., and M. Berg. 1998. Differences in medicine: An introduction. In Differences in Medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques and bodies, ed. A. Mol and M. Berg, 1-12. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
26.
Mol, A., and J. Mesman. 1996. Neonatal food and the politics of theory: Some questions of method. Social Studies of Science6 (2): 419-444.
27.
Pols, J.2003. Enforcing patient rights or improving care? The interference of two modes of doing good in mental health care. Sociology of Health & Illness25 (3): 320-347.
28.
Pols, J.2004. Good care: Enacting a complex ideal in long-term psychiatry. Utrecht, Netherlands: Trimbos-instituut.
29.
Rasmussen, J. L.2003. Ja, jeg begä overgreb (Yes, I use coercion). Information (Copenhagen, Denmark). February 26, 2003.
30.
Robins, C. S.2001. Generating revenues: Fiscal changes in public mental health care and the emergence of moral conflicts among care-givers. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry25 (4): 457-466.
31.
Rothwell P. M.1995. Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients?The Lancet346 (8496): 1616-1619.
32.
Sackett, D. L.1996. Evidence based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
33.
Sackett, D. L., S. Strauss, S. Richardson, W. Rosenberg, and R. B. Haynes. 1991. Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
34.
Timmermans, S., and M. Berg. 2003. The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
35.
Timmermans, S., G. C. Bowker, and S. L. Star. 1998. The architecture of difference: Visibility, control and comparability in building a nursing interventions classification. In Differences in Medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques and bodies, edited by A. Mol and M. Berg, 202-225. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
36.
Torrey, W. C., R. E. Drake, L. Dixon, B. J. Burns, L. Flynn, A. J. Rush, R. E. Clark, and D. Klatzker. 2001. Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services52 (2): 45-50.
37.
Zwartboek door verpleging: Verzorging in verpleeghuis neemt sterk af (Blackbook by nurses: care in nursing home declines severely). NRC Handelsblad (Rotterdam, The Netherlands), April 4, 2002.
