Works in science and technology studies (STS) have repeatedly pointed to the importance of the visual in scientific practice. STS has also explicated how embodied practice generates scientific knowledge. I aim to supplement this literature by pointing out how sound and hearing are integral aspects of experimentation. Sound helps define how and when lab work is done, and in what kinds of spaces. It structures experimental experience. It affords interactions between researchers and instruments that are richer than could be obtained with vision alone. And it is a site for tacit knowledge, providing a resource for the replication of results, and the transmission of knowledge, and the construction of social boundaries within instrumental communities.
Amann, K. 1994. Menschen, Mause und Fliegen [Men, Mice and Flies]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 23:22-40.
2.
Anonymous. 1992. Revenge of the gramophone. The Economist324: 96.
3.
Bijsterveld, K.2001. The diabolical symphony of the mechanical age: Technology and symbolism of sound in European and North American noise abatement campaigns, 1900-40. Social Studies of Science31: 37-70.
4.
Boyd, R.1991a. Introductory essay (confirmation, semantics, and the interpretation of scientific theories). In The philosophy of science, edited by R. Boyd, P. Gasper, and J. D. Trout, 3-36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Boyd, R.1991b. On the current status of scientific realism. In The philosophy of science, edited by R. Boyd, P. Gasper, and J. D. Trout, 195-222. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Brain, R.1998. Standards and semiotics. In Inscribing science: Scientific texts and the materiality of communication, edited by T. Lenoir, 249-284. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
Cambrosio, A., D. Jacobi, and P. Keating. 1993. Ehrlich’s “Beautiful Pictures” and the controversial beginnings of immunological imagery. Isis84: 662-699.
8.
Collins, H. M.1992. Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Collins, H. M.2001. Tacit knowledge, trust, and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science31: 71-86.
10.
Dennis, M. Forthcoming. Change of state: Political culture, technical practice, and the origins of Cold War America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
Douglas, M.1966. Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.
12.
Francoeur, E.1997. The forgotten tool: The design and use of molecular models. Social Studies of Science27: 7-40.
13.
Galison, P.1997. Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Goodwin, C.1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist96: 606-633.
15.
Goodwin, C.1995. Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science25: 237-274.
16.
Goodwin, C.1996. Transparent vision. In Interaction and grammar, edited by E. Ochs, 370-404. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Groenewegen, P., and L. Peters. 2002. The emergence and change of materials science and engineering in the United States. Science, Technology, and Human Values27: 112-133.
18.
Hacking, I.1983. Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Henderson, K.1999. On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Hessenbruch, A.2001. History of recent science and technology: Materials research: Scanning tunneling microscope (STM). Vol. 2002. Cambridge, MA: Dibner Institute for the History of Science and Technology. http://hrst.mit.edu/hrs/materials/public/STM_intro.htm
21.
Hessenbruch, A.2004. History of recent science and technology: Materials research. Vol. 2002. Cambridge, MA: Dibner Institute for the History of Science and Technology. http://hrst.mit.edu/hrs/materials/public/
22.
Hirschauer, S.1991. The manufacture of bodies in surgery. Social Studies of Science21: 279-319.
23.
Hoddeson, L.1992. Out of the crystal maze: Chapters from the history of solid-state physics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
Hutchins, E., and L. Palen. 1997. Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition, edited by L. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo, and B. Burge, 23-41. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
25.
Ihde, D.1976. Listening and voice: A phenomenology of sound. Athens:Ohio University Press.
26.
Jackson, A.1968. Sound and ritual. Man—New Series3: 293-299.
27.
Jakobson, R.1990. Brain and language. In On language, edited by L. Waugh and M. Monville-Burston, 498-514. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Jordan, K., and M. Lynch. 1992. The sociology of a genetic engineering technique: Ritual and rationality in the performance of a “plasmid prep.” In The right tools for the job: At work in the twentieth-century life sciences, edited by A. E. Clarke and J. H. Fujimura, 77-114. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Kaiser, D.2000. Stick-figure realism: Conventions, reification, and the persistence of Feynman diagrams, 1948-1964. Representations70: 49-86.
30.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1981. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
31.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1996. The care of the self and blind variation: The disunity of two leading sciences. In The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power, edited by P. Galison and D. J. Stump, 287-310. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Knowles, S. G., and S .W. Leslie. 2001. “Industrial Versailles”—Eero Saarinen’s corporate campuses for GM, IBM, and AT&T. Isis92: 1-33.
34.
Latour, B.1983. Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In Science observed, edited by K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, 141-170. London: Sage.
35.
Latour, B.1988a. Drawing things together. In Representation in scientific practice, edited by M. Lynch and S. Woolgar, 19-68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Latour, B.1988b. Opening one eye while closing the other...a note on some religious paintings. In Picturing power: Visual depictions and social relations, edited by G. Fyfe and J. Law, 15-38. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
37.
Latour, B.1988c. The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Latour, B.1998. How to Be iconophilic in art, science, and religion? In Picturing science, producing art, edited by C. Jones and P. Galison, 418-440. London: Routledge.
39.
Latour, B.1999. Circulating reference: Sampling the soil in the Amazon forest. In Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies, 24-79. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
Lawrence, C.1998. Medical minds, surgical bodies: Corporeality and the doctors. In Science incarnate: Historical embodiments of natural knowledge, edited by C. Lawrence and S. Shapin, 156-201. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Lenoir, T.1998. Inscription practices and materialities of communication. In Inscribing science: Scientific texts and the materiality of communication, edited by T. Lenoir, 1-19. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
Leslie, S. W.1993. The cold war and American science: The military-industrial-academic complex at MIT and Stanford. New York: Columbia University Press.
44.
Levin, D. M., ed. 1993. Modernity and the hegemony of vision. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
Lynch, M.1985a. Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
46.
Lynch, M.1985b. Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility. Social Studies of Science15: 37-66.
47.
Lynch, M.1988a. The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. In Representation in scientific practice, edited by M. Lynch and S. Woolgar, 153-186. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
Lynch, M.1988b. Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science18: 265-289.
49.
Lynch, M.1991. Laboratory space and the technological complex: An investigation of topical contextures. Science in Context4: 51-78.
50.
Lynch, M., and S. Y. Edgerton Jr.1988. Aesthetics and digital image processing: Representational craft in contemporary astronomy. In Picturing power: Visual depictions and social relations, edited by G. Fyfe and J. Law.184-220. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
51.
Merz, M.1998. “Nobody can force you when you are across the ocean”—Face to face and e-mail exchanges between theoretical physicists. In Making space for science: Territorial themes in the shaping of knowledge, edited by C. Smith and J. Agar, 313-329. London: Macmillan.
52.
Mody, C.2001. A little dirt never hurt anyone: Knowledge-making and contamination in materials science. Social Studies of Science31: 7-36.
53.
Ochs, E., P. Gonzales, and S. Jacoby. 1996. “When I come down I’m in the domain state”: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In Interaction and grammar, edited by E. Ochs, 328-369. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Ochs, E., S. Jacoby, and P. Gonzales. 1994. Interpretive journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations2: 151-171.
55.
Orr, J. E.1996. Talking about machines. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
56.
Pinch, T., H. M. Collins, and L. Carbone. 1997. Cutting up skills: Estimating difficulty as an element of surgical and other abilities. In Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings, edited by S. R. Barley and J. E. Orr, 101-112. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
57.
Pinch, T., and F. Trocco. 2002. Analog days: The invention and impact of the Moog synthesizer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
Polanyi, M.1967. The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
59.
Rasmussen, N.1997. Picture control: The electron microscope and the transformation of biology in America, 1940-1960. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
60.
Rheinberger, H.-J.1997. Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
61.
Rorty, R.1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
Rudwick, M.1976. The emergence of a visual language for geological science, 1760-1840. History of Science14: 149-195.
63.
Rudwick, M.1992. Scenes from deep time: Early pictorial representations of the prehistoric world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
Sagan, C.1985. Contact. New York: Simon and Schuster.
65.
Schaffer, S.1998. Physics laboratories and the Victorian country house. In Making space for science: Territorial themes in the shaping of knowledge, edited by C. Smith and J. Agar, 149-180. London: Macmillan.
66.
Shapin, S.1988. The house of experiment in seventeenth-century England. Isis79: 373-404.
67.
Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
Sibum, H. O.1995. Reworking the mechanical value of heat: Instruments of precision and gestures of accuracy in early Victorian England. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science26: 73-106.
69.
Sterne, J.1997. Sounds like the Mall of America: Programmed music and the architectonics of commercial space. Ethnomusicology41: 22-50.
70.
Thompson, E.1997. Dead rooms and live wires: Harvard, Hollywood, and the deconstruction of architectural acoustics, 1900-1930. Isis88: 597-626.
71.
Thompson, E.1999. Listening to/for modernity: Architectural acoustics and the development of modern spaces in America. In The architecture of science, edited by P. Galison and E. Thompson, 253-280. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72.
Thorpe, C., and S. Shapin. 2000. Who was J. Robert Oppenheimer? Charisma and complex organization. Social Studies of Science30: 545-590.
73.
Traweek, S.1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
Voskuhl, A.2004. Humans, machines, and conversations: An ethnographic study of the making of automatic speech recognition technologies. Social Studies of Science, 34.
