The authoranalyzes the types of metaphors that are used to describe the Internetin issues of Wired magazine from before and after the dot-com collapse to understand the perceptions and expectations of some of the actors involved in the shaping of the Internet. In addition, the metaphors deployed in economics and geophysiology are used to demonstrate how metaphors can influence public debate, policy, and theory. The author argues that metaphors do not simply have a descriptive function but that they also carry normative connotations. Language, alongside social practices and material objects, is an important tool in attempts to construct the future. Six overlapping metaphorical themes are identified: revolution, evolution, salvation, progress, universalism, and the “American dream.” A critical analysis of these metaphors, informed by a critique of the metaphors used in economics and geophysiology, leads the author to challenge the universalist claims made by some Internet enthusiasts for the inclusive potential of the Internet.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbate, J. 1994. Analogy is destiny: The role of metaphor in defining a new technology. Paper presented at MEPHISTOS conference, Cambridge, MA, February.
2.
Barbrook, R. 1996. Global algorithm 1.5: Hypermedia freedom. CTHEORY—Theory, Technology and Culture19 (1-2). Retrieved from www.ctheory.com/.
3.
Barlow, J. P. 1998. Africa rising. Wired. January: 142-158.
4.
Borsook, P. 2000. Cyberselfish. A critical romp through the terribly libertarian culture of high tech. New York: Public Affairs.
5.
Breazeale, D., ed. and trans. 1979. Philosophy and truth. Selections from Nietzsche’s notebooks of the early 1870s. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
6.
Bronson, P. 1998. Is the revolution over? Wired. January: 98-112.
7.
Brown, N., B. Rappert, and A. Webster. 2000. Contested futures: From looking into the future to looking at the future. In Contested futures. A sociology of prospective techno-science, edited by N. Brown, B. Rappert and A. Webster, 3-20. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
8.
Burrows, R. 1997. Virtual culture, urban social polarisation and social science fiction. In The governance of cyberspace, edited by B. Loader, 38-45. London: Routledge.
9.
Clark, N., and C. Juma. 1988. Evolutionary theories in economic thought. In Technical change and economic theory edited by G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silvergerg, and L. Soete, 197-218. London: Pinter.
10.
Crang, M., P. Crang, and J. May, eds. 1999. Virtual geographies: Bodies, space and relations. London: Routledge.
11.
Davis, M. 1990. City of quartz. London: Vintage.
12.
Dibbell, J. 2002. E-gold and Islam. Wired. January: 60-67.
13.
Eagleton, T. 1997. Spaced out, review of “Justice, nature and the geography of difference” by David Harvey. London Review of Books, pp. 22-23, April 24.
14.
Gibson, W. 1984. Neuromancer. Repr., New York: Harper Collins, 1993.
15.
Gilder, G. 1998. Happy birthday Wired. Wired. January: 40-42.
16.
Graham, S., and A. Aurigi. 1997. Urbanising cyberspace? The nature and potential of the virtual cities movement. City7, May: 18-38.
17.
Hajer, M. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Hellsten, I. 2002. The politics of metaphor. Biotechnology and biodiversity in the media. Ph.D. diss., University of Tampere, Finland.
19.
Hudson, D. 1997. Rewired: A brief (and opinionated) net history. Indianapolis, IN: Macmillan Technical.
20.
Hurtig, B. 2002. Broadband cowboy. A spectrum revolt is brewing in the heart of Indian country. Wired. January: 54-58.
21.
Joerges, B. 1989. Romancing the machine—Reflections on the social scientific construction of computer reality. International Studies of Management and Organization, 19 (4): 24-50.
22.
Johnson, C. 2002. Excite@Home’s $7 billion delusion. Three tools of self-destruction. Wired. January: 73.
23.
Jordan, T. 1999. Cyberpower: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge.
Keynes, J. M. 1973. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan. (Orig. pub. 1936).
26.
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Lanier, J. 1998. Taking stock. Wired. January: 60-62.
28.
Lenhart, A., J. Horrigan, L. Rainie, K. Allen, A. Boyce, M. Madden, and E. O’Grady. 2003. The ever-shifting Internet population. A new look at Internet access and the digital divide.Pew Internet and American Life Project report. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
29.
Lovelock, J. 1991. Gaia, The practical science of planetary medicine. London: Gaia Books.
30.
Lovelock, J. 1995. The ages of Gaia. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Maasen, S., E. Mendelsohn, and P. Weingart. 1995. Metaphors: Is there a bridge over troubled waters? In Biology as society, society as biology, edited by S. Maasen, E. Mendelsohn, and P. Weingart, 1-8. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
32.
Mambrey, P., and A. Tepper. 1998. Technology assessment as metaphor assessment—Visions guiding the development of information and communication technologies. Unpublished manuscript.
33.
Marshall, A. 1997. The principles of economics. New York: Prometheus. (Orig. pub. 1890).
34.
McCloskey, D. 1986. The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
35.
Miller, A. I. 1996. Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. New York: Springer.
36.
Neice, D. 2002. Cyberspace and social distinctions: Two metaphors and a theory. In Inside the communication revolution: Evolving patterns of social and technical interaction, edited by R. E. Mansell, 55-84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
Postrel, V. 1998. Technocracy R.I.P. Wired. January: 52-56.
38.
Rossetto, L. 1998. Some things never change. Wired. January: 20.
39.
Rothenberg, R. 1998. Bye-bye. Wired. January: 72-76.
40.
Schumpeter, J. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Simon, J. 1998. The five greatest years for humanity. Wired. January: 66-68.
42.
Stefik, M., ed. 1996. Internet dreams: Archetypes, myths and metaphors. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
Steinberg, S. 1998. Schumpeter’s lesson. Wired. January: 80-84.
44.
Stephenson, N. 1992. Snow crash. London: Penguin.
45.
Surowiecki, J. 2002. Turn of the century. Wired. January: 84-89.
46.
Thomas, G., and S. Wyatt. 1999. Shaping cyberspace—Interpreting and transforming the Internet. Research Policy28 (7): 681-698.
Winner, L. 1986. The whale and the reactor. A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Wyatt, S. 2000. Talking about the future: Metaphors of the Internet. In Contested futures. A sociology of prospective techno-science, edited by N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster, 109-126. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
50.
Wyatt, S., F. Henwood, N. Miller, and P. Senker, eds. 2000. Technology and in/equality. Questioning the information society. London: Routledge.
