A long tradition of discourse and practice claims that technology designers need to take note of the characteristics and aspirations of potential users in design. Practitioners in the field of user-centered design (UCD) have developed methods to facilitate this process. These methods represent interesting vehicles for the pursuit of normative politics of technology. In this article, the authors use a case study of the introduction and use of UCD methods in Australia to explore the politics of getting the methods to work in practice. Drawing on the work of Bruno Latour and Marc Berg, the authors argue that UCD methods are tools for engendering new forms of socio-technical relations. However, their normative potential does not arise out of their ability to manipulate abstract categories such as user, technology, and workplace. Instead, it arises out of the complex and unpredictable socio-technical mixes that are generated when people attempt to put them into practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashmore, M., and E. Richards, eds. 1996. Social studies of science. Special issue, The Politics of SSK: Neutrality, Commitment and Beyond26(2).
2.
Avison, D., F. Lau, M. Myers, and P. A. Nielsen. 1999. Action research. Communications of the ACM42: 94-97.
3.
Badham, R. 2000a. Human factors, politics, and power. In International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors, edited by W. Karwowski. New York: John Wiley.
4.
Badham, R. 2000b. Sociotechnical theory. In International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors, edited by W. Karwowski. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Badham, R., K. Garrety, and C. Kirsch. 2001. Humanistic redesign and technological politics in organisations. Special issue, Journal of Organizational Change Management14: 50-63.
6.
Badham, R., and P. Ehn. 2000. Tinkering with technology: Human factors, work redesign, and professionals in workplace innovation. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing10: 61-82.
7.
Badham, R. 1994. From socio-economic to socially oriented innovation policy. In Technology policy: Towards an integration of social and ecological concerns, edited by G. Aicholzer and G. Scheinstock, 25-62. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
8.
Barki, H., and J. Hartwick. 1994. Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quarterly18: 59-82.
9.
Berg, M. 1997. Of forms, containers, and the electronic medical record: Some tools for a sociology of the formal. Science, Technology, & Human Values22: 403-433.
10.
Berg, M. 1998. The politics of technology: On bringing social theory into technological design. Science, Technology, & Human Values23(4): 456-490.
11.
Bjerknes, G., P. Ehn, and M. Kyng. 1987. Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
12.
Bowers, J. 1992. The politics of formalism. In Contexts of computer-mediated communication, edited by M. Lea, 232-261. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
13.
Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
14.
Buchanan, D., and R. Badham. 1999. Winning the turf game: Power, politics and organisational change. London: Paul Chapman.
15.
Clegg, C. W. 1993. Social systems that marginalize the psychological and organizational aspects of information technology. Behaviour and Information Technology12: 261-266.
16.
Czaja, S. J. 1997. The human factors profession. In Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, edited by G. Salvendy, 17-40. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
17.
Daly-Jones, O., N. Bevan, and C. Thomas. 1997. Handbook of user-centred design version 1.1. London: European Usability Support Centres.
18.
Eden, C., and C. Huxham. 1996. Action research for the study of organizations. In Handbook of organizational studies, edited by S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. R. Nord, 526-542. London: Sage.
19.
Ehn, P. 1988. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.
20.
Ehn, P. 1992. Scandinavian design: On participation and skills. In Usability: Turning technologies in to tools, edited by P. S. Adler and T. A. Winograd. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Friedman, A. L., and D. S. Cornford. 1989. Computer systems development: History, organization and implementation. New York: John Wiley.
22.
Garrety, K., and R. Badham. 1999. Trajectories, social worlds and boundary objects: A frame-work for analysing the politics of technology. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing9: 1-14
23.
Garrety, K., and R. Badham. 2000. The politics of socio-technical intervention: An interactionist view. Special issue, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management12: 103-118.
24.
Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Greenbaum, J., and M. Kyng. 1991. Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Grote, G., S. Weik, T. Wäfler, and M. Zölch. 1995. Criteria for the complementary allocation of functions in automated work systems and their use in simultaneous engineering projects. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics16: 376-382.
27.
Ives, B., and M. H. Olson. 1984. User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Management Science30: 586-603.
28.
Latour, B. 1987. Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
30.
Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s hope. Essays in the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Mankin D., S. G. Cohen, and T. K. Bikson. 1997. Teams and technology: Tensions in participatory design. Organizational Dynamics26: 63-76.
32.
Martin, B. 1993. The critique of science becomes academic. Science, Technology, & Human Values18: 247-259.
33.
Martin, B. 1996. Sticking a needle into science: The case of polio vaccines and the origin of AIDS. Social Studies of Science26: 245-276.
34.
Perrow, C. 1983. The organizational context of human factors engineering. Administrative Sciences Quarterly28: 521-541.
35.
Sorensen, K. H. 1998. A sociotechnical legacy? A note on trajectories and traditions in Norwegian research on technology and work. In The spectre of participation. Technology and work in the welfare state, edited by K. H. Sorensen. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
36.
Valckenaers, P., H. V. Brussel, L. Bongaerts, and J. Wyns. 1997. Holonic manufacturing systems. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering4: 191-201.
37.
Wäfler, T., G. Grote, C. Ryser, and A. Windischer. 1997. Complementary function allocation for scheduling tasks. Paper presented at the seventh International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, San Francisco, August.
38.
Wäfler, T., A. Johansson, G. Grote, and J. Stahre. 1997. Complementary interaction of humans and machines in highly automated production systems—KOMPASS and TEAM. Paper presented at the International Ergonomics Association 13th annual congress, Tampere, Finland, June/July.
39.
Wäfler, T., and M. T. Older. 1997. Comparison of two approaches supporting decisions on function allocation. In Feelings work in Europe. Quaderni di psicologia del lavaro, no. 5, edited by F. Avallone, J. Arnold, and K. D. Witte. Milano, Italy: Guerini.
40.
Weber, M. 1946. Politics as a vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, edited by H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills, 77-128. New York: Oxford University Press. (Orig. Pub. 1918).
41.
Weedman, J. 1998. The structure of incentive: Design and client roles in application-oriented research. Science, Technology, & Human Values23: 315-345.
42.
Wilson, A. T. M. 1979. Quality of working life: An introductory overview. In The quality of working life in Western and Eastern Europe, edited by C. L. Cooper and E. Mumford, 2-17. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
43.
Winner, L. 1993. Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values18: 362-378.
44.
3/43/43/4. 1995. Citizen virtues in a technological order. In Technology and the politics of knowledge, edited by A. Feenberg and A. Hannay, 65-84. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
45.
Wotherspoon, R. 1999. Lost in Australia with a Swiss KOMPASS. A case study into the design of new technology. The second international cyberspace conference on ergonomics. Perth, Australia: International Ergonomics Association Press.
46.
Zuboff, S. 1988. In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. Oxford: Heinemann Professional.
