To better understand ethical issues involved in the field of human genetics and promote debate within the scientific community, the author surveyed scientists who engage in human genetics research about the pros, cons, and ethical implications of genetic testing. This study contributes systematic data on attitudes of scientific experts. The survey finds respondents are highly supportive of voluntary testing and the right to know one's genetic heritage. The majority consider in utero testing and consequent pregnancy termination acceptable for cases involving likelihood of serious disease but disapprove for genetic reasons they consider arbitrary, leaving a gray area of distinguishing between treatment of disorders and enhancement still to be resolved. While safeguarding patient confidentiality versus protecting at-risk third parties (kin, reproductive partners) presents a dilemma, preserving privacy from misuse by institutional third parties (employers, insurers) garners strong consensus for legislation against discrimination. Finally, a call is made for greater genetic literacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, Jerry, and John McCormick. 1998. The DNA detectives . Newsweek, 16 November, 66-70 .
2.
Anderson, Elving. 1994. Genes, behavior, and responsibility: Research perspectives. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, 105-130. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
3.
Andrews, Lori, Jane Fullerton, Neil Holtzman, and Arno Motulsky, eds. 1994. Assessing genetic risks: Implications for health and social policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press .
4.
Appleyard, Bryan. 1998. Brave new worlds: Staying human in the genetic future. New York: Viking .
5.
Asch, Adrienne. 1996. Genetics and employment: More disability discrimination. In The Human Genome Project and the future of health care, edited by Thomas Murray, Mark Rothstein, and Robert Murray, 158-172. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
6.
Beckwick, Jon, and Joseph Alper. 1998. Reconsidering genetic antidiscrimination legislation . Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics26: 205-210 .
7.
Begley, Sharon. 1998. A gene for genius? Newsweek, 25 May, 72 .
8.
Bernstein, Richard. 2000. DNA tests and the road to more reliable justice . The New York Times, 25 February, 9 .
9.
Bobinski, Mary Anne. 1996. Reproductive decision making. In The Human Genome Project and the future of health care, edited by Thomas Murray, Mark Rothstein, and Robert Murray, 79-112. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
10.
Bower, Bruce. 2000. Genes to grow on . Science News, 26 February, 142-143 .
11.
Burke. W., et al. 1997. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer . Journal of the American Medical Association277: 915-919 .
12.
Cait, Anthony. 1998. Mood genes: Hunting for origins of mania and depression . Science News, 25 July, 50 .
13.
Cole-Turner, Ronald. 1994. The genetics of moral agency. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, 161-174. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
14.
Collins, Francis. 1998. What issues in genetics research most concern 13 experts right now . Chronicle of Higher Education, 3 July, B6-B8 .
15.
Comuzzie, Anthony, and David Allison. 1998. The search for human obesity genes . Science280: 1374-1377 .
16.
Cook-Deegan, Robert. 1994. The gene wars: Science, politics, and the human genome. New York: Norton .
17.
Cranor, Carl, ed. 1994. Are genes us? The social consequences of the new genetics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
18.
Dickson, David. 1998. Congress grabs eugenics common ground . Nature394: 711 .
19.
Doyle, Richard. 1994. Vital language. In Are genes us? The social consequences of the new genetics, edited by Carl Cranor, 52-68. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
20.
Duster, Troy. 1994. Human genetics, evolutionary theory, and social stratification. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, 131-153. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
Frankel, Mark, and Audrey Chapman. 2000. Human inheritable genetic modifications: Assessing scientific, ethical, religious, and policy issues. American Association for the Advancement of Science report. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
23.
Fuller, B. P.et al. 1999. Privacy in genetics research . Science285: 1359-1361 .
24.
Geller, G., et al. 1997. Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer . Journal of the American Medical Association277: 1467-1474 .
25.
Goldberg, Jeff. 1995. The bad seed: Amid controversy, scientists hunt for the “aggression” gene . Omni, February, 16 .
26.
Golden, Frederic. 1999. Good eggs, bad eggs . Time, 11 January, 56-59 .
27.
Greely, Henry T. 1998. Genomics research and human subjects . Science282: 625 .
28.
Hall, Mark. 2000. When genes are decoded, who should see the results? The New York Times, 29 February, F7 .
29.
Hallowell, Christopher. 1999. Playing the odds: Health insurers want to know what's in your DNA . Time, 11 January, 60 .
30.
Harris, John. 1992. Wonderwoman and Superman: The ethics of human biotechnology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press .
31.
Hercz, Robert. 1998. The gene machine . Canadian Business, 30 January, 60-64 .
32.
Holden, Constance. 1998. The first gene marker for IQ? Science280: 681 .
33.
Holtzman, Neil. 1989. Proceed with caution: Predicting genetic risks in the recombinant DNA era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press .
34.
Horowitz, Craig. 1999. Time-bomb genes . New York, 8 February, 29-33 .
35.
Hudson, Kathy, Karen Rothenberg, Lori Andrews, MaryJo Kahn, and Francis Collins. 1995. Genetic discrimination and health insurance: An urgent need for reform . Science270: 391-393 .
36.
Isaacson, Walter. 1999. The biotech century . Time, 11 January, 42-43 .
37.
Jonsen, Albert. 1996. The impact of mapping the human genome on the patient-physician relationship. In The Human Genome Project and the future of health care, edited by Thomas Murray, Mark Rothstein, and Robert Murray, 1-20. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
38.
Kavka, Gregory. 1994. Upside risks: Social consequences of beneficial biotechnology. In Are genes us? The social consequences of the new genetics, edited by Carl Cranor, 155-179. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
39.
Keller, Evelyn. 1994. Master molecules. In Are genes us? The social consequences of the new genetics, edited by Carl Cranor, 89-98. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
40.
Kevles, Daniel. 1995. In the name of eugenics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
41.
Kluger, Jeffrey. 1999. DNA detectives . Time, 11 January, 62-63 .
42.
Kolata, Gina. 1997. Advent of testing for breast cancer leads to fears of disclosure and discrimination . The New York Times, 4 February, C1-C3 .
43.
Kolata, Gina. 1998. Genetic testing falls short of public embrace . The New York Times, 27 March, A16 .
44.
Kolata, Gina. 1999. $50,000 offered to tall, smart egg donor . The New York Times, 3 March, A10 .
45.
Lapham, E. Virginia, Chahira Kozma, and Joan Weiss. 1996. Genetic discrimination: Perspectives of consumers . Science274: 621-623 .
46.
Lehrman, Sally. 1997. Clinton backs congressional efforts on genetic discrimination . Nature388: 216 .
Leshner, Alan. 1994. Genetic and environmental influences on behavior. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, 103-104. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
50.
Lewin, Tamar. 2000. Boom in gene testing raises questions of sharing results . The New York Times, 21 July, A1, A16 .
51.
Macilwain, Colin. 1996. US military tightens rules on DNA records . Nature380: 570 .
Marshall, Eliot. 1998b. A clash over testing for Alzheimer's disease . Science280: 1004 .
56.
Martindale, Diane. 2001. Pink slip in your genes . Scientific American, January, 19-20 .
57.
McAbee, Gary, Jack Sherman, and Barbara Davidoff-Feldman. 1998. Physician's duty to warn third parties about the risk of genetic diseases . Pediatrics, July, 140-142 .
58.
McGee, Glenn. 1997. The perfect baby: A pragmatic approach to genetics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
59.
Mehlman, Maxwell. 1994. Access to the genome and federal entitlement programs. In The Human Genome Project and the future of health care, edited by Thomas Murray, Mark Rothstein, and Robert Murray, 113-132. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
60.
Morris, Norval. 1994. Linking genetics, behavior, and responsibility: Legal implications. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, 155-160. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
61.
Murray, Thomas H., Mark A. Rothstein, and Robert F. Murray Jr., eds. 1996. The Human Genome Project and the future of health care. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press .
62.
National Center for Genome Resources. 1998. National survey of public and stakeholders attitudes and awareness of genetic issues. Santa Fe, NM: Genetics and Public Issues Program .
63.
National Human Genome Research Institute. 1997. Ethical, legal, and social implications of the Human Genome Project. Bethesda, MD: National Human Genome Research Institute, Office of Communications .
Nowak, Rachel. 1994. Genetic testing set for takeoff . Science265: 464-467 .
66.
Office of Technology Assessment. 1988. Mapping our genes. The genome project: How big, how fast. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office .
67.
Paul, Diane. 1994. Eugenic anxieties, social realities, and political choices. In Are genes us? The social consequences of the new genetics, edited by Carl Cranor, 142-154. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
68.
Pear, Robert. 1997. States pass laws to regulate uses of genetic testing . The New York Times, 18 October, A1, A9 .
69.
Pear, Robert. 2000. Clinton bans use of genetic makeup in federal employment . The New York Times, 9 February, A16 .
70.
Powers, Madison. 1994. Privacy and the control of genetic information. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, 77-100. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
71.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1983. Screening and counseling for genetic conditions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office .
72.
Reiss, Michael, and Roger Straughan. 1996. Improving nature? The science and ethics of genetic engineering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
73.
Riccardi, Vincent. 1996. Educating clinicians about genetics. In The Human Genome Project and the future of health care, edited by Thomas Murray, Mark Rothstein, and Robert Murray, 21-38. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
74.
Ridley, Matt. 1999. Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. New York: HarperCollins .
75.
Rothenberg, Karen. 1995. Genetic information and health insurance: State legislative approaches . Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics23: 312-319 .
76.
Rothenberg, Karen, et al. 1997. Genetic information and the workplace: Legislative approaches and policy challenges . Science275: 1755-1757 .
77.
Rothwell, John C. 2000. A predictor of pathology . Nature403: 495-496 .
Shinn, Roger. 1994. Family relationships and social policy: An ethical inquiry. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, 9-23. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
80.
Singer, Eleanor, Amy Corning, and Mark Lamias. 1998. Trends: Genetic testing, engineering, and therapy: Awareness and attitudes . Public Opinion Quarterly, Winter, 633-664 .
81.
Steel, Karen, and Steve Brown. 1998. More deafness genes . Science280: 1403 .
82.
Stone, Deborah. 1996. The implications of the Human Genome Project for access to health insurance. In The Human Genome Project and the future of health care, edited by Thomas Murray, Mark Rothstein, and Robert Murray, 133-157. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
83.
Tancredi, Laurence. 1994. Collection and disclosure of genetic information. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, 47-51. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
84.
Teich, Alber, and Mark Frankel. 1994. Genetic testing and the Human Genome Project. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, xiii-xix. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
85.
Thompson, William. 1994. When science enters the courtroom: The DNA-typing controversy. In Are genes us? The social consequences of the new genetics, edited by Carl Cranor, 180-202. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
86.
Wadman, Meredith. 1997. National Institutes of Health sets up its own bioethics panel . Nature390: 651 .
87.
Wadman, Meredith. 2000. US geneticists encouraged to play by the book . Nature404: 530 .
88.
Watson, Traci, and Joseph Shapiro. 1995. Is there a “gay gene”? U.S. News & World Report, 13 November, 93 .
89.
Wertz, Dorothy, and John Fletcher. 1995. Ethics and genetics: An international survey. Unpublished data.
90.
Wertz, Dorothy, John Fletcher, and John Mulvihill. 1991. Medical geneticists confront ethical dilemmas: Cross-cultural comparisons among 18 nations . American Journal of Human Genetics46: 1200-1213 .
91.
Westin, Alan. 1994. Privacy and genetic information: A sociopolitical analysis. In The genetic frontier: Ethics, law, and policy, edited by Mark Frankel and Albert Teich, 53-76. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science .
92.
What you need to know about genetic testing now . 1996. UC Berkeley Wellness Letter, December, 4-5 .
