This article examines the emerging field of today's superscience—biotechnology— within the context of the national innovation system of one small country, namely Finland. This context is explored primarily through the practices of one particular Finnish biotechnology center, BioCity. The Silicon Valley rhetoric, which every self-respecting technology project around the world seems to incorporate into its own vocabulary, is compared with the everyday “reality” of this biotechnology center. The article focuses on the implementation of technology policy, organized following the “triple helix” model, in the field of biotechnology. Some comparisons with different countries are also made to give a picture of Finland in relation with the European life sciences industry. The article is concluded by a consideration of the future prospects of BioCity and Finnish biotechnology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartholomew, S.1997. National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies28 (2): 241-67.
2.
Carnoy, M., M. Castells, and C. Benner.1997. Labour markets and employment practices in the age of flexibility: A case study of Silicon Valley. International Labour Review136 (1): 27-48.
3.
Castells, M., and P. Hall.1994. Technopoles of the world; the making of twenty-first-century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.
4.
Cohen, S.S., and G. Fields.1999. Social capital and capital gains in Silicon Valley. California Management Review41 (2): 108-32.
5.
Edvinsson, L., and M. Malone.1997. Intellectual capital. London: Piatkus.
6.
Ernst & Young.1999a. Biotech '99-Bridging the gap. Available from http://www.ey.com/global/gcr.nsf/International/Biotech99summary.
7.
---. 1999b. Ernst & Young's European life sciences 99. Sixth annual report. Communicating value. London: Ernst & Young.
8.
Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff.1995. The triple helix: University-industry-government relations. A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST review . European Society for the Study of Science and Technology14 (1). Available from http://www.chem.uva.nl/easst/easst951_3.html#etzkowitz .
9.
European Molecular Biology Organization.1996 . Molecular biology and biotechnology research in Finland: EMBO evaluation report. Turku: Academy of Finland.
10.
Finnish Bioindustries.2000. Biotechnology sector in numbers. Available from http://www.finbio.net/bioindustries_in_finland.htm.
11.
Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow.1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
12.
Goddard, J., I. Moses, U. Teichler, I. Virtanen, and P. West.2000. External engagement and institutional adjustment. An evaluation of theUniversity of Turku. Publications of Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council.Helsinki , Finland: Edita.
13.
Halme, K.1996. Biotekniikka uusien yritysten toimialana (Biotechnology as a field for new business). Helsinki: Technical Research Centre of Finland, Group for Technology Studies.
14.
Hamel, G.1999. Bringing Silicon Valley inside. Harvard Business Review77 (5): 71-84.
15.
Jacob, M.1997. Life in the triple helix: The contract researcher, the university and the knowledge society. Science Studies10 (2): 35-49.
16.
Jolly, D., and S.V. Ramani.1996. Technology creation in the biotechnology sectors: The French connection. International Journal of Technology Management12 (7/8): 830-49.
17.
Kauppila, J., A. Salo, and J. Salminiitty.1998. Elintarviketeollisuuden teknologiset menestystekijät (Technological success periods within the field of food industry) . Technology Review60.
18.
Kivinen, O., and P. Kaipainen.2000. United States and European research and development policy in the field of biotechnology. Research paper 79. Athens, Greece: Research Institute for European and American Studies.
19.
Kivinen, O., and J. Varelius.2000. Piilaaksosta BioCityyn-Eurooppalainen bioteknologia Amerikan malliin? (From Silicon Valley to BioCity-The Americanization of European biotechnology?). Research report 51. Turku , Finland: Research Unit for the Sociology of Education, University of Turku.
20.
Larsen, J., and E. Rogers.1985. Silicon Valley fever: Growth of high-technology culture. London: Allen and Unwin .
21.
Mäki, J., ed. 1990. BioCity Hankesuunnitelma (BioCity-Action plan). Turku, Finland: Centre for Extension Studies, University of Turku.
22.
Meyer, C.1998. Relentless growth; how Silicon Valley innovation strategies can work in your business. New York: Free Press.
23.
Miettinen, R.1995. Finnish biotechnology innovations in the 1980's and the 1990's. Helsinki: Technical Research Centre of Finland, Group for Technical Studies.
24.
Ministry of Education.2000a. Biotekniikka 2000-työryhmän muistio (Biotechnology 2000 committee's report) . Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Education.
25.
---. 2000b. Finnish universities 1999. Available from http://www.minedu.fi/julkaisut/universities99/ENG_tekstit/johdanto.html .
26.
Polanyi, M.1967. The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY : Doubleday Anchor.
27.
Prevezer, M.1998. Clustering in biotechnology in the USA. In The dynamics of industrial clustering, edited by P. Swann, 124-94. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Rogers, D.M.A.1996. The challenge of fifth generation R&D. Research Technology Management39 (4): 33-42.
29.
Saxenian, A.1994a. Lessons from Silicon Valley. Technology Review97 (5): 42-52.
30.
---. 1994b. Silicon Valley versus Route 128. Inc . 16 (2): 25-27.
31.
---. 1999. Silicon Valley's new immigrant entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California .
32.
Tekel.1999. Suomen Teknologiakeskusten Liitto ry.:n jäsenien osaamisalat (Fields of expertise for members of the Finnish Science Park Association). Available from www.fispa.fi/alat.htm.
33.
Walsh, V.1993. Demand, public markets and innovation in biotechnology . Science and Public Policy20 (3): 138-56.
34.
Ziman, J.1994. Prometheus bound: Science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
