Recent research has focused on how gender and computer technology contribute to the structuring of professional roles. A case study was carried out at a long-term care facility in Winnipeg, Canada, in which a nursing unit-based automated system had been installed to control the distribution of medication to patients. A questionnaire was distributed to all nursing staff, and detailed interviews were carried out with pharmacists and nursing administrators. It was found that gender and technological change did interact to produce an ambivalent impact on professional practice and identities. New clinical pharmacy positions were established; however, the pharmacy was split into clinical and deskilled data entry positions. Nurses hoped the new system would improve medication accuracy, but they resented features that controlled their time and their autonomy. Neither group accepted the new system as a boundary object effectively linking the nursing and pharmacy departments, and it eventually was returned to the manufacturer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbot, A.1991. The future of professions: Occupation and expertise in the age of organization. In Research in the sociology of organizations, Vol. 8, edited by P. Tolbert and S. Barley, 17-42. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
Adam, B.1990. Time and social theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3.
Adler, P.1986. New technologies, new skills. California Management Review29:9-28.
4.
Anderson, J., C. Aydin, and S. Jay, eds. 1994. Evaluating health care information systems: Approaches and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Armstrong, P., H. Armstrong, J. Choiniere, E. Mykhalovsky, and J. White. 1997. Medical alert: New work organization in health care. Toronto: Garamond.
6.
Armstrong, P., J. Choiniere, and E. Day. 1993. Vital signs: Nursing in transition. Toronto: Garamond.
7.
Attewell, P.1992. Skill and occupational change in U.S. manufacturing. In Technology and the future of work, edited by P. Adler, 46-77. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Aydin, C.1989. Occupational adaptation to computerized medical information systems. Journal of Health and Social Behavior30:163-179.
9.
Aydin, C., and R. Rice. 1992. Bringing social worlds together: Computers as catalysts for new interactions in health care organizations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior33:168-175.
10.
Barker, K.1984. Effects of an automated bedside dispensing systme of medication errors. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy41:1352-1358.
11.
Barker, K.1995. Ensuring safety in the use of automated medication dispensing systems. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy52:2445-2447.
12.
Berg, A., and M. Lie. 1995. Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender?Science, Technology, & Human Values20 (3): 332-351.
13.
Bijker, W., T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, eds. 1987. The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Birenbaum, A.1982. Reprofessionalization in pharmacy. Social Science and Medicine16:871-878.
15.
Birenbaum, A.1990. In the shadow of medicine. New York: General Hall.
16.
Broadhead, N., and R. Faccinetti. 1985. Drug iatrogenesis and clinical pharmacy: The mutual fate of a social problem and a clinical movement. Social Problems32:425-436.
17.
Callon, M.1987. Society in the making. The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In The social construction of technological systems, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 83-103. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Campbell, M.1988. The structure of stress in nurses’ work. In Sociology of health care in Canada, edited by B. Singh Bolaria and H. Dickinson, 393-405. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
19.
Coburn, D., S. Rappolt, I. Bourgeault, and J. Angus. 1999. Medicine, nursing and the state. Aurora, Canada: Garamond.
20.
Crompton, R., and N. Le Feuvre. 1996. Paid employment and the changing system of gender relations: A cross national comparison. Sociology30 (3): 427-445.
21.
Fagerhaugh, S., A. Strauss, B. Suczek, and C. Wiener. 1987. Hazards in hospital care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Giddens, A.1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
23.
Gill, R., and K. Grint, eds. 1995. The gender technology relation: Contemporary theory and research. London: Taylor and Francis.
24.
Greaves, J.1996. The gender trap. Health Informatics2:194-198.
25.
Hanseth, O., K. Thoreson, and L. Winner. 1994. The politics of networking technology in health care. Computer Supported Cooperative Work2:109-130.
26.
Haraway, D.1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
27.
Health Canada. 1996. National health expenditures in Canada 1975-1996. Ottawa: Policy and Consultation Branch, Health Canada.
28.
Hepler, C.1987. The third wave in pharmaceutical education: The clinical movement. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy15:369-383.
29.
Howard, R.1987. Systems design and social responsibility: The political implications of computer supported cooperative work. Office Technology and People3:175-187.
30.
Ivey, M.1993. Shifting pharmacy’s paradigm. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy50:1869-1874.
31.
Jess, M.1993. Adapting pharmaceutical care to reality. Hospital Pharmacy28 (9): 896-898.
32.
Krause, E.1989. Review of The system of professions. An essay on the division of expert labour, by Andrew Abbot. Work and Occupations16 (3): 474-477.
33.
Lash, S., and J. Urry. 1994. Economies of signs and space. London: Sage.
34.
Lathrop, J.1993. Restructuring health care: The patient focused care paradigm. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Latour, B.1991. Technology is society made durable. In A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, edited by J. Law, 103-131. London: Routledge.
36.
Law, J., ed. 1991. A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge.
37.
Mclaughlin, J., and A. Webster. 1998. Rationalizing knowledge: ITsystems, professional identity and power. Sociological Review46 (4): 781-802.
38.
Mesler, M.1990. Boundary encroachment and task delegation: Clinical pharmacists on the medical team. Sociology of Health and Illness13:310-331.
39.
Nursing/Pharmacy Committee. August 1998. Review of the automated drug distribution system.
40.
O’Brodovich, M., and P. Rappoport. 1991. A study of pre and post unit dose conversion in a pediatric hospital. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy441:5-15.
41.
Perini, V., and L. Vermeulen. 1994. Comparison of automated medication management systems. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy51:1883-1891.
42.
Phipps, P.1990. Industrial and occupational change in pharmacy: Prescription for femininization? In Job queues, gender queues, edited by B. Reskin and P. Roos, 111-127. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
43.
Reed, M.1996. Expert power and control in late modernity: An empirical review and theoretical synthesis. Organization Studies17 (4): 573-597.
44.
Reverby, S.1989. A legitimate relationship: Nursing, hospitals and science in the twentieth century. In The American general hospital: Communities and social contexts, edited by D. Long and J. Golden, 135-156. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45.
Rifkin, J.1987. Time wars. New York: Holt.
46.
Saetnan, A.1991. Rigid policies and technological flexibility: The anatomy of a failed hospital innovation. Science, Technology, & Human Values16 (4): 419-447.
47.
Sandelowski, M.1997. Irreconcilable differences? The debate concerning nursing and technology. Journal of Nursing Scholarship29 (2): 169-174.
48.
Schneider, K., and I. Wagner. 1993. Constructing the “dossier représentatif.” Computer based information sharing in French hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work1:229-253.
49.
Star, S.1989a. Layered space, formal representations and long distance control: The politics of information. Fundamenta Scientiae10 (2): 125-154.
50.
Star, S.1989b. The structure of ill structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous problem solving. In Distributed artificial intelligence, Vol. 2, edited by L. Gasser and M. Huhns, 37-52. London: Pitman.
51.
Statistics Canada. 1994. General Social Survey. Cycle 9. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
52.
Strauss, A., S. Fagerhaugh, B. Suczek, and C. Wiener. 1985. The social organization of medical work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Suchman, L.1994. Working relations of technology production and use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work2:21-39.
54.
Wagner, I.1995. Hard times: The politics of women’s work in computerized environments. European Journal of Women’s Studies2:295-314.
55.
Wajcman, J.1991. Feminism confronts technology. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
56.
Webster, J.1996. Shaping women’s work: Gender, employment and information technology. London: Longman.
57.
Weeks, S.1994. From hi-touch to hi-tech: Hospital nursing and technological change. Technology Studies1 (2): 153-174.
58.
Winner, L.1980. Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus109:121-135.
59.
Wilensky, H.1964. The professionalization of everyone?American Journal of Sociology70:137-158.
