Representations of the active brain have served to establish a particular domain of competence for brain mappers and to distinguish brain mapping’s particular contributions to mind/brain research. At the heart of the claims about the emerging contributions of functional brain mapping is a paradox: functional imagers seem to reject representations while also using them at multiple points in their work. This article therefore considers a love-hate relationship between scientists and their object: the case of the iconoclastic imager. This paradoxical stance is the result of the formation of an interdisciplinary approach that brings together a number of scientific traditions and their particular standards of what constitutes scientific evidence. By examining the various ways in which images are deployed and rejected, the origins of these conflicting tendencies can be traced to the technological, methodological, and institutional elements in the work of functional imagers. This approach provides insight into the current demarcation of imaging and reflects on features of visual knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andreassen, N., G. Cohen, G. Harris, T. Cizatto, J. Pakinnen, K. Rezai, and V. Swayze. 1992. Image processing for the study of brain structure and function: Problems and programs. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience4:125-133.
2.
Bastide, F.1990. The iconography of scientific texts: Principles of analysis. Translated by Greg Myers. In Representation in scientific practice, edited by Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar, 187-230. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Beaulieu, A. 2000a. The space inside the skull: Digital representations, brain mapping, and cognitive neuroscience in the decade of the brain. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Science and Technology, Dynamincs, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
4.
Beaulieu, A.2000b. The brain at the end of the rainbow: Brain scans and diagnostic promises. In Wild science: Feminist readings of science, medicine and the media, edited by Kim Sawchuk and Janine Marchessault. London: Routledge.
5.
Cabeza, R., and L. Nyberg. 1997. Imaging cognition: An empirical review of PET studies with normal subjects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience9 (1): 1-26.
6.
Carson, R.1991. Precision and accuracy considerations of physiological quantitation in PET. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism11:A45-A50.
7.
Cartwright, L.1995. Screening the body: Tracing medicine’s visual culture. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
8.
Changeux, J.-P., and P. Ricoeur. 1998. La nature et la règle. Paris: Odile Jacob.
9.
Coleman, R. E.1993. Clinical PET: A technology on the brink. Journal of Nuclear Medicine34:2269-2271.
10.
Crary, J.1990. Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Crease, R.1993. Biomedicine in the age of imaging. Science261:554, 557-558, 561.
12.
Derksen, M.1997. Are we not experimenting then? The rhetorical demarcation of psychology and common sense. Theory & Psychology7 (4): 435-456.
13.
Derksen, M. 1999. Iedereen doet aan psychologie’: Retorica en Demarcatie in de Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse Psychologie. Groningen, the Netherlands: Historische Uitgeverij.
14.
DiChiro, G., and R. A. Brooks. 1988. PET quantitation: Blessing and curse. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging no. 29: 1603.
15.
Draaisma, D. 1989. Vensters op de geest: Cognitie op het snijvlak van filosofie en psychologie. the Netherlands: Stichting Grafiet.
16.
Dumit, J. 1994. Desiring a beautiful image of the brain: A cultural semiotic inquiry. Paper presented at the Conference on Visual Representation in Scientific Practice, 28 April 28-1 May. Institute for Medical Humanities, Galveston, Texas.
17.
Dumit, J.1995. Twenty-first century PET: Looking for the mind and morality through the eye of technology. In Technoscientific imaginaries: Conversations, profiles and memoirs, edited by George Marcus, 87-128. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Evans, A, C. Beil, S. Marrett, C.J. Thompson, and A. Hakim. 1988. Anatomical-Functional correlation using an adjustable MRJ-based Region of interest atlas with positron emission tomography. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism8:513-550.
19.
Feindel, W., and Y. L. Yamamoto. 1978. Physiological tomography by positrons: Introduction and physiological note. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography2:637.
20.
Fodor, J.1999. Diary. London Review of Books, 30 September, 21 (19): 1.
21.
Fox, P.1997. The growth of human brain mapping. Human Brain Mapping5:1-2.
22.
Frackowiak, R.1998. The functional architecture of the brain. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (Spring), 105-131.
23.
Frick, M., N. Gupta, J. Sunderland, M. Best, J. Rysavy, and C. Shiue. 1992. Considerations in setting up a positron emission tomography center. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine12 (3): 1982-1988.
24.
Friston, K.1998. Imaging neuroscience: Principles or maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA95 (February): 796-802.
25.
Frith, C., K. Friston, P. Liddle, and R. Frackowiak. 1991. A PET study of word finding. Neuropsychology29 (12): 1137-1148.
26.
Galison, P.1997. Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Gazzaniga, M.1989. Editor’s note. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience1 (1): 2.
28.
Gershon, D.1995. Is there a future for clinical PET?Nature Medicine1 (6): 494-495.
29.
Goertzel, B.1995. Images in search of a theory [peer commentary on Précis of Images of Mind]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences18:327-383.
30.
Goodwin, C.1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist96 (3): 606-633.
31.
Goodwin, C.1995. Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science25:237-274.
32.
Gould, S. J.1998. Ladders and cones: Constraining evolution by canonical icons. In Hidden histories of science, edited by Robert B Silvers, 37-68. London: Granta Books.
33.
Hoffman, J. M., M. Hanson, and R. Coleman. 1993. Clinical positron emission tomography imaging. Radiologic Clinics of North America31 (4): 935-959.
34.
Hugdahl, K.1995. Psychophysiology: The mind-body perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Kay, Lily E.2000. Who wrote the book of life? A history of the genetic code. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
Kember, S.1991. Medical diagnostic imaging: The geometry of chaos. New Formations15 (Winter): 55-65.
37.
Kennedy, C.1991. Louis Sokoloff at three scores and ten. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism11:885-889.
38.
Kevles, B.1997. Naked to the bone: Medical imaging in the 20th century. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
39.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Loewy, I.1992. The strength of loose concepts—Boundary concepts, federative experimental strategies and disciplinary growth: The case of immunology. History of Science30:372-396.
41.
Lumsdon, K.1992. Moving target: Hospitals take careful steps in acquiring PET. Hospitals (April). 58-62.
42.
Lynch, M.1991. Laboratory space and the technological complex: An investigation of topical contextures. Science in Context4:51-78.
43.
Mazziotta, J.1984. Physiologic neuroanatomy: New brain imaging methods present a challenge to an old discipline. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 4 December, no. 4: 481-483.
44.
Mazziotta, J., and A. Toga. 1996. Speculations about the future. In Brain mapping: The methods, edited by A. Toga and John Mazziotta, 445-457. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45.
Mountcastle, V.1998. Brain science at century’s ebb. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (Spring). 1-36.
46.
Paller, K.1995. If a picture is worth a thousand words, how many pictures is a word worth? [Peer commentary on Précis of Images of Mind]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences18:327-383.
47.
Pasveer, B. 1992. Shadows of knowledge: Making a representing practice in medicine: X-ray pictures and pulmonary tuberculosis, 1895-1930. Ph.D. diss. University of Amsterdam.
48.
Phelps, M.1991. In The enchanted loom: Chapters in the history of neuroscience, edited by Pietro Corsi. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
Powers, W., L. Berg, J. Perlmutter, and M. Raichle. 1991. Technology assessment revisited: Does positron emission tomography have proven clinical efficacy?Neurology41:1339-1340.
50.
Raichle, M.1996a. Interview. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience8 (2): 189-195.
51.
Raichle, M.1996b. Introduction to the special issue. Cerebral Cortex6(1): R3-R4.
52.
Raichle, M.1998. Behind the scenes of functional brain imaging: A historical and physiological perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA95:765-772.
53.
Rich, D.1997. A brief history of positron emission tomography. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology25 (1): 4-11.
54.
Rose, S.1999. From brains to consciousness? Essays on the new sciences of the mind. London: Penguin.
55.
Russo, E.1999. Consciousness studies: Birth of an empirical discipline?The Scientist13 (10): 14, 25.
56.
Sawle, G.1995. Imaging the head: Functional imaging. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry58:132-144.
57.
Schmitt, G.1995. Bright red spots or—The meaning of the meaning [Peer commentary of Précis of Images of Mind]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences18:327-383.
58.
Stafford, B.1991. Body criticism: Imaging the unseen in enlightenment art and medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
Stafford, B.1996. Good looking: Essays on the virtue of images. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60.
Tancredi, L., and N. Volkow. 1992. A theory of the mind-brain dichotomy with special reference to the contribution of positron emission tomography. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine!35(4): 549-571.
61.
Ter-Pogossian, M.1992. The origins of positron emission tomography. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine22 (3): 140-149.
62.
Terry, J., and J. Urla. 1995. Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
63.
Treichler, P., Lisa Cartwright, and Constance Penley, eds. 1998. The visible woman: Imaging technologies, gender, and science. New York: New York University Press.
64.
Van Dijck, José. 2000. The language and literature of life: Popular metaphors in genome research. In Wild science: Reading feminism, medicine and the media, edited by Janine Marchessault and Kim Sawchuk, 66-79. New York: Routledge.
65.
Wagner, H.1992. Positron emission tomography at the turn of the century: A perspective. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine22 (4): 285-288.
66.
Wolf, T.1997. Sorry, but your soul just died. The Independent on Sunday, 2 February, 6-10.
67.
Wood, C. C.1994. Human brain mapping in both time and space [Editorial]. Human Brain Mapping, pp. iii-vi.
68.
Yoxen, E.1987. Seeing with sound: A study of the development of medical images. In The social construction of technological systems, edited by Wiebe Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, 281-303. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
