The International Research Institute for Climate Prediction (IRI) was created in 1996 with an “end-to-end” mission to engage in climate research and modeling on a seasonal-to-interannual time scale and to provide the results of this research in a useful way to farmers, fishermen, public health officials, and others capable of making the best of the predicted climate conditions. As a boundary organization, IRI straddles the divides between the production and use of research and between the developed world and the developing world. This article describes the institutional history of IRI, examining how the end-to-end mission evolved over time, how it is becoming institutionalized in IRI as a boundary organization, and the ongoing challenges it presents to managing the boundary between climate variability research and societal applications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agrawala, S.1998a. Context and early origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climatic Change39 (4): 605-620.
2.
Agrawala, S.1998b. Structural and process history of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climatic Change39 (4): 621-642.
3.
Agrawala, S.1999. Early science-policy interactions in climate change: Lessons from the Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases. Global Environmental Change9 (2): 157-169.
4.
Agrawala, S., and K. Broad. Forthcoming. Technology transfer perspectives on climate forecast applications. Knowledge and Society.
5.
Anderson, D.L.T., E. S. Sarachik, P. J. Webster, and L. M. Rothstein, eds. 1998. The TOGA decade: Reviewing the progress of El Niño research and prediction. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
6.
Anonymous. 1997. Cooperation will help get the message across. Nature388(6337):1.
7.
Berri, G.1997. Pilot project for an international research institute (IRI). ENSO Signal, October, 2-4.
8.
Broad, K.2000. El Niño and the anthropological opportunity. Practicing Anthropology22 (4):20-23.
9.
Broad, K., and S. Agrawala. 2000. The Ethiopian famine: Uses and limits of seasonal climate forecasts. Science289 (5485): 1693-1694.
10.
Broad, K., and A. Pfaff. 1997. Prediction, profit-motive and policy in the Peruvian fishery. Columbia Earth Institute: EARTHmatters, May, 11-16.
11.
Broad, K., A. Pfaff, and M. G. Glantz. 2001. Effective and equitable dissemination of seasonal-to-interannual climate forecasts: Policy implications from the Peruvian fishery during El Niño 1997-98. Paper submitted for review.
12.
Broad, W. J.1983. Tracking El Nino: Is more destruction to come?New York Times, 2 August, C1.
13.
Callon, M.1994. Is science a public good?Science, Technology, & Human Values19 (4): 395-424.
14.
Cane, M. A., G. Eshel, and R. W. Buckland. 1994. Forecasting Zimbabwean maize yield using eastern equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature. Nature370:204-205.
15.
Cane, M. A., and E. S. Sarachik, eds. 1991. Prospectus for a tropical-oceans-global-atmosphere (TOGA) program on seasonal-to-interannual prediction. Special report no. 4, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate and Global Change Program, January.
16.
Cane, M. A., S. E. Zebiak, and S. C. Dolan. 1986. Experimental forecast of El Niño. Nature321:827-832.
17.
Carson, D. J.1998. Seasonal forecasting. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society124:1-26.
18.
Cuny, F. C.1994. Disasters and development. Dallas: Intertect Press.
19.
Eckholm, E.1986. Meteorologists say El Nino will hit in summer and fall. New York Times,14 March, B5.
20.
Finan, T. J. 1998. Of bird nests, donkey balls, and El Nino: The psychology of drought in northeast Brazil. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association annual meeting, 2-6 December, Philadelphia.
21.
Friedman, S. M., S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers. 1999. Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Fujimura, J.1992. Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and “translation.” In Science as culture and practice, edited by A. Pickering, 168-211. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Glantz, M. H.1996. Currents of change: El Niño’s impact on climate and society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Glantz, M. H., R. Katz, and N. Nicholls1991. Teleconnections linking worldwide climate anomalies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Guston, D. H.1999. Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science29 (1): 87-112.
26.
Guston, D. H.2000. Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Hall, J. M.1999. International equity and the earth sciences. Earth Matters, fall, 44-49.
28.
Lagos, P., and J. Buizer. 1992. El Niño and Peru: A nation’s response to interannual climate variability. In Natural and technological disasters: Causes, effects and preventive measures, edited by S. K. Majumdar, G. S. Forbes, E. W. Miller, and R. F. Schmalz, 223-238. Easton: Pennsylvania Academy of Science.
29.
Lemos, M. C., D. Liverman, T. Finan, R. Fox, and N. Renn. 1998. The social and policy implications of seasonal forecasting: A case study of Ceará, Northeast Brazil. Unpublished progress report to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
30.
Mason, S. J., L. Goddard, N. E. Graham, E. Yulaeva, L. Q. Sun, and P. A. Arkin. 1999. The IRI seasonal climate prediction system and the 1997/98 El Nino event. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society80 (9): 1853-1873.
31.
Moura, A. D., ed. 1992. International Research Institute for Climate Prediction: A proposal. Paper prepared in response to a request by the Intergovernmental Tropical Ocean and Global Atmosphere Board, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
32.
Moura, A. D.1995. Guest editorial. ENSO Signal, August, 3.
33.
Moura, A. D., and E. S. Sarachik. 1997. Seasonal-to-interannual climate prediction and applications: New institutions, new possibilities. WMO Bulletin46 (4): 342-347.
34.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1992. International Research Institute for Climate Prediction: A proposal. Silver Spring, MD: NOAA, Office of Global Programs.
35.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1994. A proposal to launch a seasonal-to-interannual climate prediction program. Silver Spring, MD: NOAA, Office of Global Programs.
36.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1995a. International Forum on Forecasting El Niño: Launching an International Research Institute, 6-8 November. Executive summary. NOAA, Office of Global Programs.
37.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1995b. International Forum on Forecasting El Niño: Launching an International Research Institute, 6-8 November. Forum proceedings. NOAA, Office of Global Programs.
38.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1995c. Notice: Seasonal-to-interannual climate prediction program research centers, program announcement. Federal Register60 (48): 13407-13410.
39.
National Research Council. 1999. Making climate forecasts matter. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
40.
Olson, M., Jr.1971. The logic of collective action and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Orlove, B. S., and J. Tosteson, 1999. The application of seasonal to interannual climate forecasts based on El Niño-southern oscillation (ENSO) events: Lessons from Australia, Brazil, Ethiopia, Peru and Zimbabwe. Working paper 99-3, Institute of International Studies, Berkeley, CA.
42.
Patt, A. Forthcoming. Understanding uncertainty: Forecasting seasonal climate for farmers in Zimbabwe. Risk: Decision and Policy.
43.
Pielke, R. A.2000. Guest editorial: A warning about seasonal forecasting. ENSO Signal 13. Available: http://www.esig.ucar.edu/signal/13/guest.html.
44.
Pfaff, A., K. Broad, and M. G. Glantz. 1999. Who benefits from climate forecasts?Nature397 (25 February): 645-646.
45.
Rayner, S., and E. L. Malone, eds. 1998. Human choice and climate change, vol. 1. Columbus, OH: Battelle.
46.
Roncoli, M. C., ed. 2000. Anthropology and climate change: Challenges and contributions (special issue). Practicing Anthropology22.
47.
Ropelewski, C. F., and M. S. Halpert. 1987. Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Niño/southern oscillation. Monthly Weather Review115:1606-1626.
48.
Sarachik, E. S., and E. Shea. 1997. End-to-end seasonal-to-interannual prediction. ENSO Signal, May, 4-6.
49.
Scott, J.1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
Sen, A.1984. Resources, values, and development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Shackley, Simon, and Brian Wynne. 1996. Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority. Science, Technology, & Human Values21 (3): 275-302.
52.
Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, “translation,” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science19:387-420.
