This article discusses xenotransplantation (XTP: the surgical use of nonhuman tissues, organs, and cells for human transplantation) and examines the way its scientific promoters have defended their technology against potentially damaging public representations. The authors explore the criteria used to legitimate the selection of the pig as the best species from which to “harvest” transplant tissues in the future. The authors’ analysis shows that scientists and medical practitioners routinely switch between scientific and cultural repertoires. These repertoires enable such actors to exchange expert identities in scientific discourse for public identities in cultural discourse. These discourses map onto similarities and differences between animal donors and human hosts. Finally, the case is used to comment on a number of related approaches where the dynamics of medical and scientific authority are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakx, K.1991. The “eclipse” of folk medicine in Western society. Sociology of Health and Illness13 (1): 20-38.
2.
Benton, T.1993. Natural relations: Ecology, animal rights and social justice. London: Verso.
3.
Billig, M.1987. Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Billig, M.1991. Ideology and opinions. London: Sage.
5.
Billig, M., S. Condor, D. Edwards, M. Gane, D. Middleton, and A. Radley. 1988. Ideological dilemmas. London: Sage.
6.
Brown, N.1999a. Debates in xenotransplantation: On the consequences of contradiction. New Genetics and Society18 (2): 181-196.
7.
Brown, N.1999b. Xenotransplantation: Normalising disgust. Science as Culture8:327-353.
8.
Calnan, M., and S. Williams. 1992. Images of scientific medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness14 (2): 233-254.
9.
Durant, J., M. W. Bauer, and G. Gaskell, eds. 1998. Biotechnology in the public sphere, a European sourcebook. London: The Science Museum.
10.
Elston, M. A.1987. Women and the anti-vivisection movement in Victorian England, 1870-1900. In Vivisection in historical perspective, edited by N. Rupke. London: Croom Helm.
11.
Elston, M. A.1991. The politics of professional power: Medicine in a changing society. In The sociology of the health service, edited by J. Gabe, J. Calnan, and M. Bury. London: Routledge.
12.
Elston, M. A.1992. The “animal question” in the British science press: The case of new scientist, 1970-1991. In Science and the human-animal relationship, edited by E. K. Hicks. Amsterdam: SISWO.
13.
Elston, M. A.1994. The anti-vivisection movement and the science of medicine. In Challenging medicine, by J. Gabe, D. Kelleher, and G. H. Williams. London: Routledge.
14.
Fairclough, N.1992. Language and power. New York: Longman.
15.
Fox, R., and J. Swazey. 1992. Spare parts: Organ replacement in American society. London: Open University Press.
16.
Franklin, A.1999. Animals and modern cultures: A sociology of human-animal relations in modernity. London: Sage.
17.
Franklin, S.1990. Deconstructing “desperateness”: The social construction of infertility in popular representations of new reproductive technologies. In The new reproductive technologies, edited by M. McNeil, I. Varcoe, and S. Yearley. London: Macmillan.
18.
Freidson, E.1970. The profession of medicine. New York: Dodd Mead.
19.
Gabe, J., D. Kelleher, and G. Williams. 1994. Challenging medicine. London: Routledge.
20.
Gabriel, S.1989. Black to black. Community Care, 12 October, 26.
21.
Gieryn, T. F.1983. Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48:781-795.
22.
Gieryn, T. F.1999. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
23.
Haraway, D.1994. A game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations2 (1): 59-71.
24.
Haug, M.1973. Deprofessionalisation: An alternative hypothesis for the future. Sociological Review Monograph20:48-56.
25.
Hilhorst, M.1998. Xenografting as a subject for public debate. In The social management of genetic engineering, edited by P. Wheale, R. von Schomberg, and P. Glasner. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
26.
Jaspers, J., and D. Nelkin. 1992. The animals rights crusade. New York: Free Press.
27.
Kelleher, D.1990. Do self-help groups help?International Disability Studies12:66-69.
28.
Kelleher, D.1994. Self-help groups and medicine. In Challenging medicine, by J. Gabe, D. Kelleher, and G. H. Williams. London: Routledge.
29.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern. Translated by C. Porter. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
31.
Law, J.1987. Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of the Portuguese expansion. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 111-134. Cambridge: MIT Press.
32.
Lewenstein, B.1995. Science and the media. In Handbook of science and technology studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, and T. Pinch, 343-360. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Lock, S.1986. Self-help groups: The fourth estate in medicine. British Medical Journal292 (1): 696-699.
34.
Lundin, S.1999. The boundless body: Cultural perspectives on xenotransplantation. Ethnos64 (1): 5-31.
35.
Lupton, D.1994. Representations of medicine, illness and disease in elite and popular culture. In Medicine as culture: Illness, disease and the body in Western societies. London: Sage.
36.
Martin, E.1998. Anthropology and cultural study of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values23 (1): 24-44.
37.
Michael, M.1996. Constructing identities: The social, the nonhuman and change. London: Sage.
38.
Michael, M., and L. Birke. 1994. Animal experimentation: Enrolling the core set. Social Studies of Science24:81-95.
39.
Michael, M., and L. Birke. 1995. Animal experiments, scientific uncertainty and public unease. Science as Culture5 (2): 248-276.
40.
Myerson, G., and Y. Rydin. 1996. The language of environment: The new rhetoric. London: UCL Press.
41.
Nelkin, D.1994. Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: Freeman.
42.
Plein, C.1991. Popularising biotechnology. Science, Technology, & Human Values16:474-490.
43.
Ritvo, H.1987. The animal estate: The English and other creatures in the Victorian age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Saks, M.1992. Introduction. In Alternative medicine in Britain. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
45.
Snowdon, P. F.1991. Personal identity and brain transplants. In Human being, edited by D. Coburn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Thomas, K.1983. Man and the natural world. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
47.
Weiss, M., and R. Fitzpatrick. 1997. Challenges to medicine: The case of prescribing. Sociology of Health and Illness19 (3): 297-327.
48.
Weiss, R. A.1999. Xenografts and retroviruses. Science285:1221-1222.
49.
Welsh, I., and R. Evans. 1999. Xenotransplantation, risk, regulation and surveillance: Social and technological dimensions of change. New Genetics and Society18 (2): 197-219.
50.
Williams, G. H., and J. Popay. 1993. Researching the people’s health: Dilemmas and opportunities for social scientists. In Social research and public health, Salford Papers in Sociology no. 13, edited by J. Popay and G. H. Williams. Salford, UK: University of Salford, Department of Sociology.
51.
Wynne, B.1989a. Frameworks of rationality in risk management: Towards the testing of a naïve sociology. In Environmental threats, edited by J. Brown, 33-45. London: Belhaven.
52.
Wynne, B.1989b. Sheep farming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information. Environment Magazine31 (2): 10-15, 33-39.
