Although there are many possible ways of understanding menopause, it is the notion of menopause as hormone deficiency that currently dominates. How is it that this account remains prevalent rather than some alternative understanding of menopause? This question is explored through the employment of a framework informed by both actor network theory and symbolic interactionist studies. The author exploits the common ground shared by these two conceptual approaches to analyze how practices generate and reify particular kinds of knowledge about menopause. The analysis is situated within Australian menopause clinics and explores several key contemporary practices of these clinics to show how the particular understanding of menopause as hormone deficiency is generated and stabilized. The study stresses the knowledge/practice nexus and emphasizes that meanings are not given in advance but are generated through practices. In particular, the focus is on the interactions of the social and the material entities of menopause clinics and how through these interactions the understanding of menopause as hormone deficiency is produced.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker, H. S., and M. M. McCall. 1990. Symbolic interaction and cultural studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Bell, S. E.1987. Changing ideas: The medicalization of menopause. Social Science and Medicine24 (6): 535-542.
3.
Bell, S. E.1990. Sociological perspectives on the menopause. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences592 (13): 173-178.
4.
Bentley, H. B.1967. Modern radiological methods of bone densitometry—A survey. Radiography33 (391): 155-162.
5.
Beyene, Y.1986. Cultural significance and physiological manifestations of menopause. A biocultural analysis. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry10:47-71.
6.
Bijker, W. E., T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, eds. 1987. The social construction of technological systems: New directions on the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Bijker, W., and J. Law, eds. 1992. Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Callon, M., J. Law, and A. Rip. 1986. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. London: MacMillan Press.
9.
Chirawatkul, S. 1992. The social construction of menopause in Northeastern Thailand. Paper presented at the 4th Tropical Health and Nutrition Conference, October, at Brisbane, Australia.
10.
Clarke, A. E.1991. Social worlds/arena theory as organizational theory. In Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss, edited by D. R. Maines, 119-157. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
11.
Clarke, A. E., and J. H. Fujimura. 1992. The right tools for the job: At work in the twentieth century life sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Clarke, A. E., and E. M. Gerson. 1990. Symbolic interactionism in social studies of science. In Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies, edited by H. S. Becker and M. M. McCall, 179-214. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
13.
Clarke, A. E., and T. Montini. 1993. The many faces of RU486: Tales of situated knowledges and technological contestation. Science, Technology, & Human Values18 (1): 42-78.
14.
Coney, S.1991. The menopause industry: A guide to medicine’s “discovery” of mid-life women. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin.
15.
Coope, J., and J. Marsh. 1992. Can we improve compliance with long term HRT?Maturitas15 (2): 151-158.
16.
Delaney, J., M. J. Lupton, and E. Toth. 1988. The curse: A cultural history of menstruation. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
17.
Denzin, N. K.1992. Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
18.
Dewey, J.1934. Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch.
19.
du Toit, B. M.1990. Aging and menopause among Indian South African women. New York: State University of New York Press.
20.
Farberman, H. A., and R. S. Perinbanayagam. 1985. Studies in symbolic interaction: Foundations of interpretive sociology. Original essays in symbolic interaction. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
21.
Flint, M.1975. The menopause: Reward or punishment. Psychosomatics16:161-163.
22.
Flint, M., and S. R. Suprapti. 1990. Cultural and subcultural meanings of the menopause. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences592 (13): 134-148.
23.
Formanek, R.1990. The meanings of menopause: Historical, medical and clinical perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
24.
Fujimura, J. H.1991. On methods, ontologies and representation in the sociology of science: Where do we stand? In Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss, edited by D. R. Maines, 207-248. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
25.
Greenblatt, R., ed. 1986. A modern approach to the perimenopausal years. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
26.
Guillemin, M. 1996. Unravelling the account of menopause as hormone deficiency: Working practices of the menopause clinic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.
27.
Haraway, D. J.1994. A game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations1:59-71.
28.
Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians. 1987. Bone mineral densitometry. Annals of Internal Medicine107:932-936.
29.
Latour, B.1987. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Latour, B.1988a. Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems35 (3): 298-310.
31.
Latour, B.1988b. The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Law, J., ed. 1985. Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
34.
Law, J.1991. Power, discretion and strategy. In A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, edited by J. Law, 165-191. London: Routledge.
Law, J., and J. Hassard, eds. 1999. Actor network theory and after. Boston, MA: Blackwell.
37.
Law, J., and A. Mol. 1995. Notes on materiality and sociality. Sociological Review43:274-294.
38.
Layne, L.1998. Introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values23 (1): 4-23.
39.
Lewis, J.1993. Feminism, the menopause and hormone replacement therapy. Feminist Review43 (spring): 38-56.
40.
Lock, M.1991. Contested meanings of the menopause. Lancet337:1270-1272.
41.
MacPherson, K. I.1981. Menopause as disease: The social construction of a metaphor. Advances in Nursing Science3 (2): 95-113.
42.
McCrea, F. B.1983. The politics of menopause: The “discovery” of a deficiency disease. Social Problems31 (1): 111-123.
43.
Melton, J. L.1990. Epidemiology of osteoporosis: Predicting who is at risk. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences592 (13): 295-306.
44.
Milner, M., C. Barry-Kinsella, M. Short, and R. F. Harrison. 1993. Setting up a specialist menopause clinic in Ireland. Maturitas16:71-77.
45.
Mol, A., and J. Law. 1994. Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science24:641-671.
46.
Mol, A., and J. Mesman. 1996. Neonatal food and the politics of theory: Some questions of method. Social Studies of Science26:419-444.
47.
Notelovitz, M.1981. Menopause clinics: Purpose, function and international comparisons. In The controversial climacteric, edited by P.A.V. Keep, W. H. Utian, and A. Vermeulen, 147-161. Lancaster, UK: MTP Press.
48.
Notelovitz, M.1990. Is there a need for menopause clinics?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences592 (13): 239-241.
49.
Oudshoorn, N.1994. Beyond the natural: An archaeology of sex hormones. London: Routledge.
50.
Rosenberger, N.1986. Menopause as a symbol of anomaly: The case of Japanese women. In Culture, society and menstruation, edited by V. Olesen and N. F. Woods, 15-23. New York: Hemisphere.
51.
Singleton, V., & Michael, M.1993. Actor networks and ambivalence: General practitioners in the UK cervical screening programme. Social Studies of Science23:227-264.
52.
Star, S. L.1991. Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, edited by J. Law, 26-56. London: Routledge.
53.
Swartzman, L. C., and S. Leiblum. 1987. Changing perspectives on the menopause. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology6:11-24.
54.
Theisen, C. S., and P. K. Mansfield. 1993. Menopause: Social construction or biological destiny?Journal of Health Education24 (4): 209-213.
55.
Traweek, S.1992. Border crossings: Narrative strategies in science studies and among physicists in Tsukuba Science City, Japan. In Science as practice and culture, edited by A. Pickering, 429-465. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Utian, W. H.1976. Scientific basis for post-menopausal estrogen therapy: The management of specific symptoms and rationale for long term replacement. In The menopause: A guide to current research and practice, edited by R. Beard, 175-201. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
57.
Verran, H.1999. Staying true to the laughter in Nigerian classrooms. In Actor network theory and after, edited by J. Law and J. Hassard, 136-155. Boston, MA: Blackwell.
58.
Wilbush, J.1988. Climacteric disorders: Historical perspectives. In The menopause, edited by J. Studd and M. I. Whitehead, 1-14. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
59.
Wren, B. G.1985. Oestrogen replacement therapy: The management of an endocrine deficiency disease. Medical Journal of Australia142 (27): S1-S15.
60.
Wren, B. G., and L. Brown. 1991. Compliance with hormonal replacement therapy. Maturitas13:17-21.
