Diane Vaughan’s analysis of the causes of the Challenger accident suggests ways to apply science and technology studies to the teaching of engineering ethics. By sensitizing future engineers to the ongoing construction of risk during mundane engineering practice, we can better prepare them to address issues of public health, safety, and welfare before they require heroic intervention. Understanding the importance of precedents, incremental change, and fallible engineering judgment in engineering design may help them anticipate potential threats to public safety arising from routine aspects of workplace culture. We suggest modifications of both detailed case studies on engineering disasters and hypothetical, ethical dilemmas employed in engineering ethics classes. Investigating the sociotechnical aspects of engineering practice can improve the initial recognition of ethical problems in real-world settings and provide an understanding of the role of workplace organization and culture in facilitating or impeding remedial action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, Jeffrey C., Bernhard Giesen, Richard Munch, and Neil J. Smelser, eds. 1987. The micro-macro link. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Alpern, Kenneth D. 1983. Engineers as moral heroes. In Beyond whistle-blowing: Defining engineers’ responsibilities: Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Ethics in Engineering, March 1982, edited by V. Weil, 40-55. Chicago: Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology.
3.
Arras, John D.1991. Getting down to cases: The revival of casuistry in bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy16:29-51.
4.
Bell, Trudy E., and Karl Esch. 1987. The fatal flaw in flight 51-L. IEEE Spectrum, February, 36-51.
5.
Boland, Richard J. 1983. Organizational control systems and the engineer: The need for organizational power. In Beyond whistle-blowing: Defining engineers’ responsibilities: Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Ethics in Engineering, March 1982, edited by V. Weil, 200-210. Chicago: Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology.
6.
Brizendine, John C.1992. Statement of John C. Brizendine, president, Douglas Aircraft Company, McDonnell Douglas Corporation. In The DC-10 case: A study in applied ethics, technology, and society, edited by John H. Fielder and Douglas Birsch, 199-203. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Clarke, Lee. 1992. The wreck of the Exxon Valdez.In Controversy: Politics of technical decisions, edited by Dorothy Nelkin, 80-96. 3d ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Collins, H. M.1985. Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
9.
Davis, Michael. 1991. Thinking like an engineer: The place of a code of ethics in the practice of a profession. Philosophy & Public Affairs20:150-167.
10.
Davis, Michael. 1998. Thinking like an engineer: Studies in the history of a profession. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Downey, Gary Lee. 1998a. Ethics and engineering selfhood. Paper presented at the Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Conference, October, Halifax, Canada.
12.
Downey, Gary Lee. 1998b. The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
13.
Downey, Gary Lee, and Juan C. Lucena. 1995. Engineering Studies. In Handbook of science and technology studies, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerry Markle, James Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, 167-188. London: Sage.
14.
Eddy, Paul, Elaine Potter, and Bruce Page. 1992a. The Applegate memorandum. In The DC-10 case: A study in applied ethics, technology, and society, edited by John H. Fielder and Douglas Birsch, 101-108. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
Eddy, Paul, Elaine Potter, and Bruce Page. 1992b. Fat, dumb, and happy: The failure of the FAA. In The DC-10 case: A study in applied ethics, technology, and society, edited by John H. Fielder and Douglas Birsch, 109-122. Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
Engineering Ethics. 2000. Home page, Division of Technology, Culture, and Communication, University of Virginia [Online]. Available: http://repo-nt.tcc.virginia.edu/ethics/
17.
Fielder, John H., and Douglas Birsch, eds. 1992. The DC-10 case: A study in applied ethics, technology, and society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18.
Florman, Samuel C. 1983. Comments on Pletta and Gray and Schinzinger. In Beyond whistle-blowing: Defining engineers’ responsibilities: Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Ethics in Engineering, March 1982, edited by V. Weil, 83-89. Chicago: Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology.
19.
Fuller, Steve. 1988. Social epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20.
Galison, Peter, and David J. Stump, eds. 1996. The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
Harris, Charles E., Jr.1995. Explaining disasters: The case for preventative ethics. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine14 (2): 22-27.
22.
Harris, Charles E., Jr., Michael S. Pritchard, and Michael Rabins. 1995. Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
23.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1991. Acceptable evidence in a pluralistic society. In Acceptable evidence: Science and values in risk management, edited by Deborah G. Mayo and Rachelle D. Hollander, 29-47. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 1993. Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis. Risk Analysis13:123-129.
25.
Jasanoff, Sheila, Gerry Markle, James Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, eds. 1995. Handbook of science and technology studies. London: Sage.
26.
Jonsen, Albert R., and Stephen Toulmin. 1988. The abuse of casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Kipnis, Kenneth. 1992. Engineers who kill: Professional ethics and the paramountcy of public safety. In The DC-10 case: A study in applied ethics, technology, and society, edited by John H. Fielder and Douglas Birsch, 143-160. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
Knorr-Cetina, K., and A. V. Cicourel, eds. 1981. Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
29.
Kohn, P., and R. Hughson. 1980. Perplexing problems in engineering ethics. Chemical Engineering, 5 May, 100-107.
30.
Latour, Bruno. 1996. Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Law, John. 1987. On the social explanation of technical change: The case of the Portuguese maritime expansion. Technology and Culture28:227-252.
32.
Lickona, Thomas. 1980. What does moral psychology have to say to the teacher of ethics? In Ethics teaching in higher education, edited by Daniel Callahan and Sissela Bok, 103-132. New York: Plenum.
33.
Lynch, William T.1994. Ideology and the sociology of scientific knowledge. Social Studies of Science24:197-227.
34.
Lynch, William T.1997-1998. Teaching engineering ethics in the United States. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine16 (4): 27-36.
35.
Malin, Martin. 1983. Legal protection for whistleblowers. In Beyond whistle-blowing: Defining engineers’ responsibilities: Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Ethics in Engineering, March 1982, edited by V. Weil, 11-32. Chicago: Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology.
36.
Mark, Hans. 1987. The space station: A personal journey. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
37.
Martin, Mike W., and Roland Schinzinger. 1996. Ethics in engineering. 3d ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
McDonnell Douglas. 1992. The DC-10: A special report. In The DC-10 case: A study in applied ethics, technology, and society, edited by John H. Fielder and Douglas Birsch, 227-235. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
Meiskus, Peter, and James Watson. 1989. Professional autonomy and organizational constraint: The case of engineers. Sociological Quarterly30:561-585.
40.
Merton, Robert K.1979. The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, edited by R. K. Merton. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Mitcham, Carl. 1994. Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Nader, Ralph. 1983. The engineer’s professional role: Universities, corporations, and professional societies. In Engineering professionalism and ethics, edited by James H. Schaub and Karl Povlovic, 276-284. New York: John Wiley.
43.
Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science. 1999. [Online]. Available: http://onlineethics.org
44.
Perry, T.1981. Five ethical dilemmas. IEEE Spectrum, June, 53-60.
45.
Petroski, Henry. 1985. To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. New York: St. Martin’s.
46.
Pinkus, Lynn B., Larry J. Shuman, Norman P. Hummon, and Harvey Wolfe. 1997. Engineering ethics: Balancing cost, schedule, and risk—Lessons learned from the space shuttle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Porter, Theodore M.1995. Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
Rouse, Joseph. 1996. Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
49.
Sawyier, Fay. 1983. The case of the DC-10 and discussion. In Engineering professionalism and ethics, edited by James H. Schaub and Karl Pavlovic, 388-401. New York: John Wiley.
50.
Unger, Stephen H.1994. Controlling technology: Ethics and the responsible engineer.2ded.New York: John Wiley.
51.
Vaughan, Diane. 1996. The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Vesilind, P. Aarne. 1988. Rules, ethics and morals in engineering education. Engineering Education, February, 289-293.
53.
Vincenti, Walter. 1990. What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
54.
Weil, Vivian, ed. 1983. Beyond whistle-blowing: Defining engineers’ responsibilities: Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Ethics in Engineering, March 1982. Chicago: Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology.
55.
Werhane, Patricia H.1991. Engineers and management: The challenge of the Challenger incident. Journal of Business Ethics10:605-616.
56.
Werhane, Patricia H.1987. Integrating ethics teaching into courses in engineering design. Science, Technology & Society62/63:12-17.
57.
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1987. Experience with the project method of teaching ethics in a class of engineering design. Unpublished manuscript.
58.
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1995. Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics1:299-308.
59.
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1997. Using problems and cases in teaching professional ethics: Theory and practice. In Teaching criminal justice ethics: Strategic issues, edited by John Kleinig and Margaret L. Smith. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
60.
Wynne, Brian. 1988. Unruly technology: Practical rules, impractical discourses and public understanding. Social Studies of Science18:147-167.
