This article argues that “technologies of culture” influence citizens’ conceptions of the American state. The technology of modernism (which lasted into the 1960s) educated citizens to manipulate machines and control nature. This influenced citizens’ views of government’s tasks and capacities. Postmodern technology focuses attention on the self and alters people’s conceptions of the tasks and capacities of government. The article discusses the political implications of postmodern citizenship and suggests possible remedies for postmodernism’s effects on democratic citizenship in the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Barnes, Barry, David Bloor, and John Henry. 1996. Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Bennett, W. Lance. 1992. The governing crisis: Media, money, and marketing in American elections. New York: St. Martin’s.
4.
Blank, Robert, and Janna C. Merrick. 1995. Human reproduction, emerging technologies, and conflicting rights. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
5.
Cantril, Hadley, ed. 1951. Public opinion 1935-46. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1995. Science and the founding fathers: Science in the political thought of Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, and Madison. New York: Norton.
7.
Cook-Deegan, Robert. 1994. The gene wars: Science, politics, and the human genome. New York: Norton.
8.
Davis, Richard, and Diana Owen. 1998. New media and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Eliasoph, Nina. 1998. Avoiding politics: How Americans create apathy in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Etzioni, Amitai. 1996. The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. The descent of Icarus: Science and the transformation of contemporary democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Fallows, James. 1996. Breaking the news: How the media undermine American democracy. New York: Pantheon.
13.
Feenberg, Andrew. 1991. Critical theory of technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge: The coming of science and technology studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
Galston, William. 1993. Liberal democracy and the problem of technology. In Technology in the Western political tradition, edited by Arthur M. Melzer, Jerry Weinberger, and M. Richard Zinman, 22-53. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
Grayson, Paul J.1993. Skill, autonomy, and technological change in Canada. Work and Occupations29 (1): 23-45.
17.
Hart, David M.1998. Forged consensus: Science, technology, and economic policy in the United States, 1921-1953. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Hollinger, David A.1995. Postethnic America: Beyond multiculturalism. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Kerbel, Matthew Robert. 1994. Edited for television: CNN, ABC, and the 1992 presidential campaign. Boulder, CO: Westview.
20.
Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 1995. Politics on the endless frontier: Postwar research policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
Knez, Igor. 1995. Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, March, 39-51.
22.
Koch, Adrienne, and William Peden, eds. 1944. The life and selected writings of Thomas Jefferson. New York: The Modern Library.
23.
La Follette, Marcel C.1990. Making science our own: Public images of science 1910-1955. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Lichterman, Paul. 1996. The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Long, Janice, and Pamela S. Zurer. 1995. Facts and figures for chemical R and D. Chemical and Engineering News, 28 August, 34-64.
26.
Macey, Samuel L.1989. The dynamics of progress: Time, method, and measure. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
27.
Marx, Leo. 1994. The idea of “technology” and postmodern pessimism. In Technology, pessimism and post-modernism, edited by Yaron Ezrahi, Everett Mendelssohn, and Howard Segal, 11-29. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
28.
McWilliams, Wilson Carey. 1993. Science and freedom: America as the technological republic. In Technology in the Western political tradition, edited by Arthur M. Melzer, Jerry Weinberger, and M. Richard Zinman, 85-109. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Melzer, Arthur M.1993. The problem with “The problem of technology.” In Technology in the Western political tradition, edited by Arthur M. Melzer, Jerry Weinberger, and M. Richard Zinman, 287-323. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
Melzer, Arthur M., Jerry Weinberger, and M. Richard Zinman. 1993. Preface. In Technology in the Western political tradition, edited by Arthur M. Melzer, Jerry Weinberger, and M. Richard Zinman, vii-xv. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
Mutz, Diana C.1998. Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
National Center for Educational Statistics. 1997. Digest of education statistics, 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
33.
National performance review: Reengineering through information technology. 1993. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
34.
Nelkin, Dorothy, and M. Susan Lindee. 1995. The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. New York: Freeman.
35.
Nolan, James L., Jr.1998. The therapeutic state: Justifying government at century’s end. New York: New York University Press.
36.
Pinch, Trevor. 1996. The social construction of technology: A review. In Technological change: Methods and themes in the history of technology, edited by Robert Fox, 17-37. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
37.
Popkin, Samuel L.1994. The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. 2d ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Putnam, Robert. 1996. The strange disappearance of civic America. The American Prospect, Winter, 34-58.
39.
Raphael-Leff, Joan. 1992. The baby makers: An indepth single-case study of conscious and unconscious psychological reactions to infertility and “baby making” technology. British Journal of Psychotherapy8 (3): 278-294.
40.
Reeves, Byron, and Clifford Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Rhea, Joseph Tilden. 1997. Race pride and the American identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Sale, Kirkpatrick. 1995. Rebels against the future: The Luddites and their war on the Industrial Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43.
Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr.1992. The disuniting of America: Reflections on a multicultural society. New York: Norton.
44.
Sclove, Richard E.1995. Democracy and technology. New York: Guilford.
45.
Smiley, Jane. 1995. Moo. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
46.
Smith, Bruce L. R.1990. American science policy since World War II. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
47.
Stern, Steven E., and David Kipnis. 1993. Technology in everyday life and perceptions of competence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology23:1892-1902.
48.
Stoll, Clifford. 1995. Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York: Doubleday.
49.
Turkle, Sherry. 1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
50.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1991. Federally funded research: Decisions for a decade. OTA-SET-490. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
51.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and society, edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
Williams, Raymond. 1975. The long revolution. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
53.
Williams, Trevor. 1994. Information technology and self-managing work groups. Behavior and Information Technology, July-August, 268-276.
54.
Wynne, Brian. 1996. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology, edited by Scott Lash, Bronislaw Szersynski, and Brian Wynne, 44-84. London: Sage.
