This article seeks to open up a new avenue for feminist technology studies—gender-aware research on engineers and engineering practice—on the grounds that engineers are powerful symbols of the equation between masculinity and technology and occupy significant roles in shaping new technologies. Drawing on the disparate evidence available, the author explores four themes. The first asks why the equation between masculinity and technology is so durable when there are such huge mismatches between image and practice. The second examines this mismatch in the detail of engineering knowledge and practice to reveal that fractured and contradictory constructions of masculinity frequently coexist. The third theme addresses the suggestion that women and men might bring different styles to engineering. Finally, the author explores subjective experiences of engineering to argue that engineers’ shared pleasures in and identification with technology both define what it means to be an engineer and provide appealing symbols of power that act to compensate for a perceived lack of power or competence in other arenas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, H. W., and K. H. Sørensen. 1994. Frankenstein’s Dilema: En Bok om Teknologi, Miljø of Verdier. Oslo, Norway: Ad Notam Glydendal.
2.
Arnold, E., and W. Faulkner. 1985. Smothered by invention: The masculinity of technology. In Smothered by invention: Technology in women’s lives, edited by W. Faulkner and E. Arnold, 18-50. London: Pluto.
3.
Aune, M.1996. The computer in everyday life: Patterns of domestication of a new technology. In Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life, edited by M. Lie and K. H. Sørensen, 91-120. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
4.
Barinaga, M.1993. Is there a “female style” in science? Science260: 384-391.
5.
Berg, A. -J.1997. Digital feminism. Dragvoll, Norway: Senter for Teknologi of Samfum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
6.
Berg, A. -J., and M. Lie. 1995. Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender? Science, Technology, & Human Values20 (3): 332-351.
7.
Berner, B.1992. Professional or wage worker? Engineer and economic transformation in Sweden. Polhem2: 131-161.
8.
Bijker, W., and J. Law, eds. 1992. Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
9.
Brod, H., and M. Kaufman. 1994. Introduction. In Theorizing masculinities, edited by H. Brod and M. Kaufman, 1-10. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Bucciarelli, L. L.1994. Designing engineers. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11.
Butler, J.1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
12.
Caputi, J.1988. Seeing elephants: The myths of phallotechnology. Feminist Studies14 (3): 487-524.
13.
Carter, R., and G. Kirkup. 1990. Women in engineering: A good place to be?London: Macmillan.
14.
Cockburn, C.1983. Brothers: Male dominance and technological change. London: Pluto.
15.
Cockburn, C.1985a. Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know-how. London: Pluto.
16.
Cockburn, C.1985b. Caught in the wheels: The high cost of being a female cog in the male machinery of engineering. In The social shaping of technology, edited by D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman, 55-66. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
17.
Cockburn, C.1992. The circuit of technology: Gender, identity and power. In Consuming technology: Media and information in domestic spaces, edited by R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch, 32-47. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
18.
Cockburn, C., and R. F. Dilic, eds. 1994. Bringing technology home: Gender and technology in a changing Europe. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
19.
Cockburn, C., and S. Ormrod. 1993. Gender and technology in the making. London: Sage.
20.
Cohn, C. [1987] 1996. Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. In Gender and scientific authority, edited by B. Laslell, S. G. Kohlstedt, H. Longino, and E. Hammonds, 183-214. Reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Connell, R. W.1987. Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
22.
Constant, E.1984. Communities and hierarchies: Structures in the practice of science and technology. In The nature of technological knowledge: Are models of scientific change Relevant? edited by R. Laudan, 27-43. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
23.
Cowan, R. S.1987. The consumption junction: A proposal for research strategies in the sociology of technology. In The social construction of technological systems, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 261-280. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24.
Cox, C.1992. Eco-feminism. In Inventing women: Science, technology and gender, edited by G. Kirkup and L. Smith Keller, 282-294. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
25.
Cronberg, T. 1995. The feeling of home: Russian women in the defense industry and the transformation of their identities. Paper presented to an international workshop on the mutual shaping of gender and technology, October, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
26.
Downey, G. L., and J. A. Lucena. 1995. Engineering studies. In Handbook of science and technology studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, E. G. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. Pinch, 167-188. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Easlea, B.1981. Science and sexual oppression. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
28.
Easlea, B.1983. Fathering the unthinkable: Masculinity, scientists and the nuclear arms race. London: Pluto.
29.
Edwards, P. N.1996. The closed world: Computers and the politics of discourse in cold war America. Cambridge: MIT Press.
30.
Faulkner, W.1994. Conceptualizing knowledge used in innovation: A second look at the science-technology distinction and industrial innovation. Science, Technology, & Human Values19 (4): 425-458.
31.
Faulkner, W.1995. Feminist, science and technology: Irreconcilable streams? Journal of Gender Studies4 (3): 341-347.
32.
Faulkner, W.1998. Extraordinary journeys around ordinary technologies in ordinary lives. Social Studies of Science28 (3): 484-489.
33.
Feminist and constructivist perspectives on new technology [Special issue]. 1995. Science, Technology, & Human Values20 (3).
34.
Ferguson, E. J.1992. Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35.
Florman, S.1976. The existential pleasures of engineering. New York: St. Martin’s.
36.
Freeman, C.1982. The economics of industrial innovation. 2d ed.London: Frances Pinter.
37.
Gardner, R. E.1976. Women in engineering: The impact of attitudinal differences on educational institutions. Engineering Education67: 233-240.
38.
Gender analysis and the history of technology [Special issue]. 1997. Technology and Culture38 (1): 1-272.
39.
Grint, K., and R. Gill, eds. 1995. The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research. London: Taylor & Francis.
40.
Grint, K., and S. Woolgar. 1995. On some failures of nerve in constructivist and feminist analyses of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values20 (3): 286-310.
41.
Hacker, S.1989. Pleasure, power and technology: Some tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
42.
Hacker, S.1990. Doing it the hard way: Investigations of gender and technology. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
43.
Haddon, L.1990. Researching gender and home computers. In Technology and everyday life: Trajectories and transformations, edited by K. H. Sørensen and A. -J. Berg, 89-108. Oslo: Norwegian Research Council for Science and Humanities.
44.
Håpnes, T.1996. Not in their machines: How hackers transform computers into subcultural artefacts. In Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life, edited by M. Lie and K. H. Sørensen, 121-150. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
45.
Håpnes, T., and B. Rasmussen. 1991. Excluding women from the technologies of the future? Futures, December, 1107-1119.
46.
Håpnes, T., and B. Rasmussen. 1998. Internett og multimedia - avmaskulinisering av IT? [Internet and multimedia - demasculinisation of IT?], Kvinder, Kon, & Forskning, nr. 1.
47.
Haraway, D.1986. Primatology is politics by other means. In Feminist approaches to science, edited by R. Bleier, 77-118. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
48.
Harding, S.1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
49.
Henwood, F.1993. Establishing gender perspectives on information technology: Problems, issues and opportunities. In Gendered by design? Information technology and office systems, edited by E. Green, J. Owen, and D. Pain, 31-52. London: Taylor & Francis.
50.
Henwood, F.1994. Engineering difference: Discourses on gender, sexuality and work. Working Paper Series No. 3. London: Innovation Studies, University of East London.
51.
Henwood, F.1996. WISE choices? Understanding occupational decision-making in a climate of equal opportunities for women in science and technology. Gender and Education8 (2): 199-214.
52.
Hughes, T.1983. Networks of power: Electrification in Western society 1880-1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53.
Kaufman, M.1994. Men, feminism, and men’s contradictory experiences of power. In Theorizing masculinities, edited by H. Brod and M. Kaufman, 142-164. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
Keller, E. F.1985. A world of difference. Reflections on gender and science, 158-176. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
Keller, E. F.1990. From secrets of life to secrets of death. In Body/politics: Women and the discourses of science, edited by M. Jacobus, E. F. Keller, and S. Shuttleworth, 177-191. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
56.
Keller, E. F.1992. How gender matters, or, why it’s so hard for us to count past two. In Inventing women: Science, technology and gender, edited by G. Kirkup and L. Smith Keller, 42-49. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
57.
Kerr, A. 1995. Feminising science: Linking theory and practice. Ph.D. diss., University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
58.
Kidder, T.1981. The soul of a new machine. Boston: Little, Brown.
59.
Kimbell, R., R. Stables, and R. Green. 1996. Understanding practice in design and technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
60.
Kimmel, M. S.1994. Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. In Theorizing masculinities, edited by H. Brod and M. Kaufman, 119-141. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Kvande, E., and B. Rasmussen. 1990. Nye kvinneliv. Kvinner i menns organisasjoner. Oslo: Ad Notam forlag.
62.
Law, J.1987. Technology, closure and heterogeneous engineering: The case of the Portuguese expansion. In The social construction of technological systems, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 111-134. Cambridge: MIT Press.
63.
Layton, E. T.1971. The revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the engineering profession. Cleveland, OH: Press of Case Western University.
64.
Lerman, N. E., A. P. Mohun, and R. Oldenziel. 1997. The shoulders we stand on and the view from here: Historiography and directions for research. Technology and Cutlure38 (1): 9-30.
65.
Lie, M.1995. Technology and masculinity: The case of the computer. European Journal of Women’s Studies2 (3): 379-394.
66.
Lie, M.1996a. Gender in the image of technology. In Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life, edited by M. Lie and K. H. Sørensen, 201-223. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
67.
Lie, M.1996b. “Excavating” the present: The computer as gendered material culture. Knowledge and Society10: 51-68.
68.
Lie, M.1998. Computer dialogues: Technology, gender and change. Trondheim, Norway: Senter for kvinneforskning, Norges Teknisk-naturvitenskapelige Universitet.
69.
Lie, M., and K. H. Sørensen, eds. 1996. Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
70.
Lovell, J., and J. Kluger. 1994. Lost moon: The perilous voyage of Apollo 13. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
71.
MacInnes, J.1998. The end of masculinity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
72.
MacKenzie, D., and J. Wajcman. 1985. Introduction. In The social shaping of technology, edited by D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman, 2-25. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
73.
Massey, D.1995. Masculinity, dualisms and high technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geography20: 486-499.
74.
McIlwee, J. S., and J. G. Robinson. 1992. Women in engineering: Gender, power, and workplace culture. Albany: SUNY.
75.
McNeil, M.1987. It’s a man’s world. In Gender and expertise, edited by M. McNeil, 187-197. London: Free Association Books.
76.
Mellström, U.1995. Engineering lives: Technology, time and space in a male-centred world. Linköping, Sweden: Department of Technology and Social Change.
77.
Merchant, C.1980. The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. London: Wildwood House.
78.
Merchant, C.1992. Radical economy: The search for a liveable world. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
79.
Morell, V.1993. Called “trimates,” three bold women shaped their field. Science260: 420-425.
80.
Murphy, P.1990. Gender differences in pupils’ reasons to practical work. In Practical science, edited by B. Woolnough, 112-122. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
81.
Murray, F.1993. A separate reality: Science, technology and masculinity. In Gendered by design? Information technology and office systems, edited by E. Green, J. Owen, and D. Pain, 64-80. London: Taylor & Francis.
82.
Noble, D.1991. A world without women: The evolution of the masculine culture of science. New York: Knopf.
83.
Robinson, G. J., and J. S. McIlwee. 1991. Men, women, and the culture of engineering. The Sociological Quarterly32 (3): 403-421.
84.
Roper, M.1994. Masculinity and the British organization man since 1945. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
85.
Rose, H.1983. Hand, brain, and heart. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society9 (1): 73-96.
86.
Rose, H.1994. Love, power and knowledge: Towards a feminist transformation of the sciences. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
87.
Scott, J.1988. Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press.
88.
Silverstone, R., and E. Hirsch, eds. 1992. Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
89.
Sørensen, K. H.1992. Towards a feminized technology? Gendered values in the construction of technology. Social Studies of Science22: 5-31.
90.
Sørensen, K. H. 1997. The masculine mystique: Engineering tales. Paper presented to Network of European Centres in Science and Technology Studies workshop on Gender, Science and Technology, May, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
91.
Sørensen, K., and A. -J. Berg. 1987. Genderization of technology among Norwegian engineering students. Acta Sociologica30 (2): 151-171.
92.
Sørensen, K., and A. -J. Berg., eds. 1991. Technology and everyday life: Trajectories and transformations. Oslo: Norwegian Research Council for Science and the Humanities.
93.
Sørensen, K., and N. Levold. 1992. Tacit networks, heterogeneous engineers, and embodied technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values17 (1): 13-35.
94.
Trescott, M. M.1984. Women engineers in history: Profiles in persistence and holism. In Women in scientific and engineering professions, edited by V. B. Hass and C. C. Perucci, 181-204. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
95.
Turkle, S.1984. The second self. New York: Simon & Schuster.
96.
Turkle, S.1988. Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In Technology and women’s voices, edited by C. Kramarae, 41-61. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
97.
Turkle, S., and S. Papert. 1990. Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society16 (1): 128-158.
98.
Vincenti, W.1990. What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
