This article proposes three states in an actor-network and a global/local distinction among actants. This theoretical framework is applied to two invention networks: one created by an inventor of solar heating systems and another created by a designer who wanted to create an environmentally sustainable furniture fabric. Both solar inventor and fabric designer wanted to develop technologies that would improve the environment and also make money. The article concludes by considering whether invention networks that intend to turn “good into gold” have to evolve a shared representation or whether it is sufficient for a new design to serve as a boundary object for actants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allenby, B.1999. Earth systems engineering: The role of industrial ecology in an engineered world. Journal of Industrial Ecology2 (3): 73-93.
2.
Bijker, W. E.1987. The social construction of Bakelite: Toward a social theory of invention. In The social construction of technological systems, edited by W. E. Bjiker, T. P. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 159-187. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Bijker, W. E.1995. Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Bloor, D.1997. Remember the Strong Program?Science, Technology, & Human Values22 (3): 373-385.
5.
Callon, M.1987. Society in the making: The study of a technology as a tool for sociological anal ysis. In The social construction of technological systems, edited by W. E. Bjiker, T. P. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 83-106. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Caporael, L.1997. Evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and Social Psychology Review1 (4): 276-298.
7.
Carlson, W. B.1994. Entrepreneurship in the early development of the telephone: How did William Orton and Gardiner Hubbard conceptualize this new technology?Business and Economic History23 (2): 161-192.
8.
Colborn, T., D. Dumanoski, and J. P. Myers. 1997. Our stolen future. New York: Penguin.
9.
Cole, J.2000. Boeing halts research on jet amid strike. The Wall Street Journal, March 15, pp. A3, A8.
10.
Diamond, J.1997. Guns, germs and steel. New York: Norton.
11.
Galison, P.1997. Image & logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Giere, R. N.1988. Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Gorman, M. E.1992. Simulating science: Heuristics, mental models and technoscientific thinking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14.
Gorman, M. E.1997. Mind in the world: Cognition and practice in the invention of the telephone. Social Studies of Science27 (4): 583-624.
15.
Gorman, M. E.1998. Transforming nature: Ethics, invention and design. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
16.
Gorman, M. E., and W. B. Carlson. 1990. Interpreting invention as a cognitive process: The case of Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison and the telephone. Science, Technology, & Human Values15:131-164.
17.
Gorman, M., M. Hertz, G. Louis, L. Magpili, M. Mauss, M. Mehalik, and J. B. Tuttle. 2000. Combining ethics and design: Monsanto and genetically-modified organisms. St. Louis, MO: American Society for Engineering Education.
18.
Gorman, M. E., M. M. Mehalik, W. B. Carlson, and M. Oblon. 1993. Alexander Graham Bell, Elisha Gray and the speaking telegraph: A cognitive comparison. History of Technology15:1-56.
19.
Gorman, M. E., M. M. Mehalik, and P. H. Werhane. 2000. Ethical and environmental challenges to engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
Graham, L. R.1993. The ghost of the executed engineer: Technology and the fall of the Soviet Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Hamel, G., and C. K. Prahalad. 1994. Competing for the future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
22.
Hawken, P.1993. The ecology of commerce. New York: HarperCollins.
23.
Henderson, K.1998. The role of material objects in the design process: A comparison of two design cultures and how they contend with automation. Science, Technology, & Human Values23 (2): 139-174.
24.
Hounshell, D. A.1976. Bell and Gray: Contrasts in style, politics and etiquette. Proceedings of the IEEE64: 1305-1314.
25.
Hughes, T. P.1987. The evolution of large technological systems. In The social construction of technological systems, edited by W. E. Bjiker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 51-82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Hughes, T. P.1998. Rescuing prometheus. New York: Pantheon.
27.
Hutchins, E.1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Kilman, S., and T. M. Burton. 1999. Monsanto boss’s vision of “life sciences” firm now confronts reality. The Wall Street Journal, pp. A1, A10.
29.
Kuhn, T. S.1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Lakatos, I.1978. The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Law, J.1987. Technology and heterogeneous engineering. In The social construction of technological systems, edited by W. E. Bjiker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Law, J., and M. Callon. 1992. The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In Shaping technology, building society, edited by W. E. Bjiker and J. Law, 21-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Levidow, L., S. Carr, and D. Wield. 1997. European biotechnology regulation: Framing the risk assessment of a herbicide-tolerant crop. Science, Technology, & Human Values22 (4): 472-505.
34.
Lovins, L. H., A. B. Lovins, and S. Zuckerman. 1986. Energy unbound: A fable for America’s future. San Francisco: Sierra Club.
35.
McDonough, W.1995. The William McDonough Collection. New York: DesignTex.
36.
Mehalik, M. M.2000a. Sustainable network design: A commercial fabric case study. Interfaces (Special issue: Sustainable Business) 30: (3): 180-189.
37.
Mehalik, M. M.2000b. Technical and design tools: The integration of ISO 14001, life cycle development, environmental design and cost accounting. In ISO 14001 case studies and practical experience, edited by R. Hillary, 380-400. London: Greenleaf.
38.
Moreland, R. L. Forthcoming. Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In Shared knowledge in organizations, edited by L. Thompson, D. Messick, and J. Levine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Nattrass, B., and M. Altomare. 1999. The Natural Step for business: Wealth, ecology and the evolutionary corporation. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
40.
Northrop, M. F., P. W. Riggs, and F. A. Raymond. 1995. Selling solar: Financing household solar energy in the developing world (Pocantico paper no. 2). New York: Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
41.
Rodgers, E.1996. Flying high: The story of Boeing and the rise of the jetliner industry. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
42.
Scott, J. C.1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Sherif, M.1936. The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.
44.
Simon, H. A.1981. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
Slezak, P. (1989). Scientific discovery by computer as empirical refutation of the Strong Programme. Social Studies of Science19 (4): 563-600.
46.
Sonenshein, S., M. Gorman, and P. Werhane. 1997. Solar Electric Light Fund (A), (B), and Teaching Note. Charlottesville, VA: Colgate-Darden School of Business.
47.
Sorensen, K. H., and N. Levold. 1992. Tacit networks, heterogeneous engineers, and embodied technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values17 (1): 13-35.
48.
Werhane, P. H.1999. Moral imagination and management decision making. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
49.
William McDonough Architects. 1992. The Hannover principles. New York: Author.
