Apparatus is described for measurement of sound speed and ultrasound attenuation coefficients by the substitution technique in the frequency range 3 to 8 MHz. Phase-cancellation artifacts leading to overestimation of attenuation coefficients are avoided by use of an acoustoelectric transducer. Specimens confined by polystyrene windows can be interrogated by focused ultrasound beams at selected locations spaced on a grid of 3 × 3 mm voxels. Pulse time of flight is measured with an accuracy of 30 ns, yielding sound speeds accurate to ±6.7 m/s, for samples 10 mm thick. Uncertainties in measured insertion losses range from 0.1 dB in low-loss (10 dB) specimens to 0.5 dB in high-loss (25 dB) specimens.
Kelly-FryE.SanghviN.T.HeimburgerR.F., A Combined Clinical and Research Approach to the Problem of Ultrasound Visualization of Breast, in Ultrasound in Medicine1, WhiteD., Ed., pp. 309–320 (Plenum Press, New York/London, 1975).
2.
Cole-BeugletC.GoldbergB.B.KurtzA.B.RubinC.S.PatchefskyA.S.ShaferG.S., Ultrasound mammography: A comparison with radiographic mammography, Radiology139, 693–698 (1981).
3.
HarperA.P.Kelly-FryE.NoeJ.S., Ultrasound breast imaging—the method of choice for examining the young patient, Ultrasound Med. Biol.7, 231–237 (1981).
4.
CarsonP.L.MeyerC.R.ScherzingerA.L.OughtonT.V., Breast imaging in coronal planes with simultaneous pulse echo and transmission ultrasound, Science214, 1141–1143 (1981).
5.
SchreimanJ.S.GisvoldJ.J.GreenleafJ.F.BahnR.C., Ultrasound transmission computed tomography of the breast, Radiology150, 523–530 (1984).
6.
ScherzingerA.L.BelgamR.A.CarsonP.L.MeyerC.R.SutherlandJ.V.BooksteinF.L.SilverT.M., Assessment of ultrasound computer tomography in symptomatic breast patients by discriminant analysis, Ultrasound Med. Biol.15, 21–28 (1989).
7.
GreenleafJ.F.JohnsonS.A.LeeS.L.HermanG.T.WoodE.H., Algebraic Reconstruction of Spatial Distributions of Acoustic Absorption Within Tissue from Their Two-Dimensional Acoustic Projections, in Acoustical Holography5, GreenP.S., Ed., pp. 591–603 (Plenum Press, New York, 1974).
8.
CarsonP.L.ScherzingerA.L.OughtonT.V.KubitschekJ.E.LambertP.A.MooreC.E.DunnM.G.DickD.E., Progress in Ultrasonic Computer Tomography (CT) of the Breast, in, Proc. Soc. Photooptical Instrumentation Engineers173, pp. 372–381 (1979).
GreenP.S.SchaeferL.F.JonesE.D.SuarezJ.R., A New, High Performance Ultrasonic Camera, in Acoustical Holography5, GreenP.S., Ed., pp. 493–503 (Plenum Press, New York, 1974).
11.
GreenP.S., Orthographic Transmission Imaging, in Clinics in Diagnostic Ultrasound, WellsP.N.T.ZiskinM., Eds., p. 123–143 (Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1980).
12.
CalderonC.VilkomersonD.MezrichR.EtzoldK.F.KingsleyB.HaskinM., Differences in the attenuation of ultrasound by normal, benign, and malignant breast tissue, J. Clin. Ultrasound4, 249–254 (1976).
13.
McDanielC.A., Ultrasonic Attenuation Measurements on Excised Breast Carcinoma at Frequencies from 6 to 10 MHz, in Proc. 1977 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 234–236 (IEEE Cat. No. 77CH 1264-1SU).
14.
Kelly-FryE.SanghviN.T.FryF.J.GallagherH.S., Frequency Dependent Attenuation of Malignant Breast Tumors Studied by the Fast Fourier Transform Technique, in Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization II, LinzerM., Ed., National Bureau of Standards Special Publ. No. 525, pp. 85–94 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., 1979).
15.
FosterF.S.HuntJ.W., Transmission of ultrasound through human tissues—focussing and attenuation studies, Ultrasound Med. Biol.5, 257–268 (1979).
16.
LandiniL.SarnelliR.SquartiniF., Frequency-dependent attenuation in breast tissue characterization, Ultrasound Med. Biol.11, 599–603 (1985).
17.
d'AstousF.T.FosterF.S., Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue, Ultrasound Med. Biol.12, 795–808 (1986).
18.
HeymanJ.S.CantrellJ.H., Application of an Ultrasonic Phase-Insensitive Receiver to Material Measurements, in Proc. 1977 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 124–128 (IEEE Cat. No. 77CH 1264-1SU).
BusseL.J.MillerJ.G., Response characteristics of a finite aperture, phase insensitive ultrasonic receiver, based on the acoustoelectric effect, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.70, 1370–1376 (1981).
21.
BusseL.J.MillerJ.G., Detection of spatially non-uniform ultrasonic radiation with phase sensitive (piezoelectric) and phase insensitive (acoustoelectric) receivers, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.70, 1377–1386 (1981).
22.
HutsonA.R.WhiteD.L., Elastic wave propagation in piezoelectric semiconductors, J. Appl. Phys.33, 40–47 (1962).
23.
WeinreichG., Ultrasonic attenuation by free carriers in germanium, Phys. Rev.107, 317 (1957).
24.
KossoffG.Kelly-FryE.JellinsJ., Average velocity of ultrasound in the human female breast, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.53, 1730–1736 (1973).
25.
KossoffG., Analysis of focusing action of spherically curved transducers, Ultrasound Med. Biol.5, 359–365 (1979).
26.
O'DonnellM.JaynesE.T.MillerJ.G., Kramers-Kronig relationship between ultrasonic attenuation and phase velocity, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.69, 696–701 (1981).
27.
EdmondsP.D.MortensenC.L.HillJ.R.HollandS.K.JensenJ.F.SchattnerP.ValdesA.D.LeeR.H.MarzoniF.A., Ultrasound tissue characterization of breast biopsy specimens, Ultrasonic Imaging13, 162–185 (1991).
28.
KinslerL.E.FreyA.R., Fundamentals of Acoustics, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1962).
29.
FryW.J.DunnF., Ultrasound: Analysis and Experimental Methods in Biological Research, in Physical Techniques in Biological ResearchVol. 4, NastukW.L., Ed., pp. 261–394 (Academic Press, New York, 1962).
