Range resolution improvement in ultrasonic echography is considered as an estimation problem which is solved using a new fast minimum variance de-convolution algorithm specially designed for a microprocessor-based on-line processing. This method is used to accurately study the lenses and fundus of the eye and to follow variations of an arterial wall thickness during the cardiac cycle.
FatemiM.KakA.C., Ultrasonic B-scan imaging: theory of image formation and a technique for restoration, Ultrasonic Imaging2, 1–47 (1980).
2.
HermentA., Traitement des signaux en échographie ultrasonore: imagerie haute résolution, caractérisation tissulaire, Thèse de Doctorat d'Etat, Université de Paris-6, 1984.
3.
DemomentG., Déconvolution (Cours de l'Ecole Supérieure d'Electricité, n°2964, 1984).
4.
HundtE.E.TrautenbergE.A., Digital processing of ultrasonic data by deconvolution, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrasonics.SU-27, 249–252 (1980).
5.
KohlW.SchwartzR., A simple method of realizing the deconvolution of ultrasonic images, Ultrasonics19, 272–278 (1981).
6.
BurgogneB.ParkovichJ., Digital Filtering of Acoustic Images, in Acoustical Imaging, vol. 11, PowersJ.P. ed., pp. 181–207 (Plenum Press, New-York, 1982).
7.
VollmannW., Resolution enhancement of ultrasonic B-scan images by deconvolution, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrasonics.SU-29, 78–83 (1982).
PapoulisA.ChamzasC., Improvement of range resolution by spectral extrapolation, Ultrasonic Imaging1, 121–135 (1979).
10.
KucR.B., Application of Kalman filtering techniques to diagnostic ultrasound, Ultrasonic Imaging1, 105–120 (1979).
11.
PisaE.J.BarnesC.W., A statistical estimation approach to medical image reconstruction from ultrasonic array data, in Acoustical Imaging, Vol. 10, AlaisP.MetherellA.F., eds., pp. 83–114, (Plenum Press, New-York, 1982).
12.
RobinsonD.E.WingM., Lateral deconvolution of ultrasonic beams, Ultrasonic Imaging6, 1–12 (1984).
13.
Saint-FélixD.Mohammad-DjafariA.DemomentG., Iterative Generalized-Inverse Image Restoration, in 1984 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Processing Proceedings, pp. 37.9.1–4 (IEEE Cat. n°84CH1945-5).
14.
Saint-FélixD.DemomentG.HermentA., Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization by 2-D Image Restoration, in 1984 IEEE 6th. Ann. Conf. Engng. Med. Biol. Soc. Proceedings, pp. 98–102 (IEEE Cat. n°84CH2058-6).
15.
HoY.C.LeeR.C.K., A Bayesian approach to problems in stochastic estimation and control, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control.AC-9, 333–339 (1964).
16.
FranklinJ.N., Well-posed stochastic extensions of ill-posed linear problems, J. Math. Analy. Appl.31, 682–716 (1970).
17.
DemomentG.ReynaudR.HermentA., Fast Minimum Variance Deconvolution, in 1984 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Processing Proceedings, pp. 28B 3.1.-4 (IEEE Cat. n°84CH1945-5).
18.
DemomentG.ReynaudR.SégalenA., Estimation Sous-optimale Rapide pour la Déconvolution en Temps Réel, in 1983 9th. Colloque GRETSI Proceedings, pp. 205–210.
19.
DemomentG.ReynaudR.HermentA., Fast Minimum Variance Deconvolution, LSS Intern. Report n°061/1983.
20.
HermentA.DemomentG.VaysseM., Algorithm for On-line Deconvolution of Echographic Signals, in Acoustical Imaging, Vol. 10, AlaisP.MetherellA.F., eds., pp. 325–345 (Plenum Press, New-York, 1982).
21.
WoodS.L.MacovskiA.MorfM., Reconstruction with Limited Data Using Estimation Theory, in Computer Aided Tomography and Ultrasonics in Medicine, RavivJ.GreenleafJ.F.HermanG.T., eds., pp. 219–233 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979).
PatelD.J.VaishvavR.N., Mechanical Properties of Arteries, in Cardiovascular Flow Dynamics and Measurements, HwangN.H.C.NormannN.A., eds., pp. 439–472 (University Park Press, Baltimore, 1977).
24.
CrumpN.D., A Kalman filter approach to the deconvolution of signals, Geophysics39, 432–444 (1974).
25.
CommengesD., The deconvolution problem: fast algorithms including the preconditioned conjugate-gradient to compute a MAP estimator. IEEE Trans. Automatic ControlAC-29, 229–243 (1984).
26.
LefebvreJ.P., Quantitative Ultrasonic Imaging: Acoustic Impedance Tomography, in 1984 1st Colloque Image Proceedings, pp. 773–778.
